Cargando…

Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity

A growing body of research suggests that movement aids facial expression recognition. However, less is known about the conditions under which the dynamic advantage occurs. The aim of this research was to test emotion recognition in static and dynamic facial expressions, thereby exploring the role of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyunwoo, Küster, Dennis, Girard, Jeffrey M., Krumhuber, Eva G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221081
_version_ 1785114864510828544
author Kim, Hyunwoo
Küster, Dennis
Girard, Jeffrey M.
Krumhuber, Eva G.
author_facet Kim, Hyunwoo
Küster, Dennis
Girard, Jeffrey M.
Krumhuber, Eva G.
author_sort Kim, Hyunwoo
collection PubMed
description A growing body of research suggests that movement aids facial expression recognition. However, less is known about the conditions under which the dynamic advantage occurs. The aim of this research was to test emotion recognition in static and dynamic facial expressions, thereby exploring the role of three featural parameters (prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity) in human and machine analysis. In two studies, facial expression videos and corresponding images depicting the peak of the target and non-target emotion were presented to human observers and the machine classifier (FACET). Results revealed higher recognition rates for dynamic stimuli compared to non-target images. Such benefit disappeared in the context of target-emotion images which were similarly well (or even better) recognised than videos, and more prototypical, less ambiguous, and more complex in appearance than non-target images. While prototypicality and ambiguity exerted more predictive power in machine performance, complexity was more indicative of human emotion recognition. Interestingly, recognition performance by the machine was found to be superior to humans for both target and non-target images. Together, the findings point towards a compensatory role of dynamic information, particularly when static-based stimuli lack relevant features of the target emotion. Implications for research using automatic facial expression analysis (AFEA) are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105464172023-10-04 Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity Kim, Hyunwoo Küster, Dennis Girard, Jeffrey M. Krumhuber, Eva G. Front Psychol Psychology A growing body of research suggests that movement aids facial expression recognition. However, less is known about the conditions under which the dynamic advantage occurs. The aim of this research was to test emotion recognition in static and dynamic facial expressions, thereby exploring the role of three featural parameters (prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity) in human and machine analysis. In two studies, facial expression videos and corresponding images depicting the peak of the target and non-target emotion were presented to human observers and the machine classifier (FACET). Results revealed higher recognition rates for dynamic stimuli compared to non-target images. Such benefit disappeared in the context of target-emotion images which were similarly well (or even better) recognised than videos, and more prototypical, less ambiguous, and more complex in appearance than non-target images. While prototypicality and ambiguity exerted more predictive power in machine performance, complexity was more indicative of human emotion recognition. Interestingly, recognition performance by the machine was found to be superior to humans for both target and non-target images. Together, the findings point towards a compensatory role of dynamic information, particularly when static-based stimuli lack relevant features of the target emotion. Implications for research using automatic facial expression analysis (AFEA) are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10546417/ /pubmed/37794914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221081 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kim, Küster, Girard and Krumhuber. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kim, Hyunwoo
Küster, Dennis
Girard, Jeffrey M.
Krumhuber, Eva G.
Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title_full Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title_fullStr Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title_full_unstemmed Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title_short Human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
title_sort human and machine recognition of dynamic and static facial expressions: prototypicality, ambiguity, and complexity
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221081
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunwoo humanandmachinerecognitionofdynamicandstaticfacialexpressionsprototypicalityambiguityandcomplexity
AT kusterdennis humanandmachinerecognitionofdynamicandstaticfacialexpressionsprototypicalityambiguityandcomplexity
AT girardjeffreym humanandmachinerecognitionofdynamicandstaticfacialexpressionsprototypicalityambiguityandcomplexity
AT krumhuberevag humanandmachinerecognitionofdynamicandstaticfacialexpressionsprototypicalityambiguityandcomplexity