Cargando…
Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement
INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy is a time of increased healthcare screening, and past adherence to evolving guidelines informs best practices. Although studies of Group B Streptococcus guideline adherence have focused primarily on treatment of Group B Streptococcus carriers, this study broadly evaluated lon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100028 |
_version_ | 1785114876175187968 |
---|---|
author | Santillan, Donna A. Hubb, Alexander J. Nishimura, Taryn E. Rosenfeld-O'Tool, Sandra R. Schroeder, Kathleen J. Conklin, Jona M. Karras, Alexandra E. Gumusoglu, Serena B. Brandt, Debra S. Miller, Emily Hunter, Stephen K. Santillan, Mark K. |
author_facet | Santillan, Donna A. Hubb, Alexander J. Nishimura, Taryn E. Rosenfeld-O'Tool, Sandra R. Schroeder, Kathleen J. Conklin, Jona M. Karras, Alexandra E. Gumusoglu, Serena B. Brandt, Debra S. Miller, Emily Hunter, Stephen K. Santillan, Mark K. |
author_sort | Santillan, Donna A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy is a time of increased healthcare screening, and past adherence to evolving guidelines informs best practices. Although studies of Group B Streptococcus guideline adherence have focused primarily on treatment of Group B Streptococcus carriers, this study broadly evaluated long-term adherence to both Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines. Adherence was evaluated across provider types (obstetrics and gynecology, certified nurse midwives, and family medicine). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Demographic and clinical information were extracted from all prenatal care and delivery patients at a single institution in a single year. Vancomycin prescriptions in pregnancy were tracked for 10 years to determine long-term adherence. Adherence was defined as no deviation from 2010 Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Adherence occurred in 89% (1,610/1,810) of patients. Reasons for deviations from guidelines could not always be determined. There was no significant difference in maternal age, race, prenatal provider type, provider type at delivery, gestational age at delivery, delivery mode, or whether antibiotic sensitivities were performed between compliant and noncompliant groups. Significant differences in adherence were found between obstetric clinics (high-risk obstetrics clinic, maternal‒fetal medicine fellows clinic, continuity of care clinic, and faculty private clinic) (p<0.0001) and between the faculty family medicine clinic and resident family medicine clinic (p=0.001). Vancomycin prescription practice did not change significantly over the10-year period. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of adherence to Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines in pregnancy have positive implications for reducing antibiotic resistance. Given evolving guidelines, there is a need to periodically evaluate adherence and to re-educate providers about standard practices and best documentation practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10546507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105465072023-10-03 Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement Santillan, Donna A. Hubb, Alexander J. Nishimura, Taryn E. Rosenfeld-O'Tool, Sandra R. Schroeder, Kathleen J. Conklin, Jona M. Karras, Alexandra E. Gumusoglu, Serena B. Brandt, Debra S. Miller, Emily Hunter, Stephen K. Santillan, Mark K. AJPM Focus Research Article INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy is a time of increased healthcare screening, and past adherence to evolving guidelines informs best practices. Although studies of Group B Streptococcus guideline adherence have focused primarily on treatment of Group B Streptococcus carriers, this study broadly evaluated long-term adherence to both Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines. Adherence was evaluated across provider types (obstetrics and gynecology, certified nurse midwives, and family medicine). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Demographic and clinical information were extracted from all prenatal care and delivery patients at a single institution in a single year. Vancomycin prescriptions in pregnancy were tracked for 10 years to determine long-term adherence. Adherence was defined as no deviation from 2010 Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Adherence occurred in 89% (1,610/1,810) of patients. Reasons for deviations from guidelines could not always be determined. There was no significant difference in maternal age, race, prenatal provider type, provider type at delivery, gestational age at delivery, delivery mode, or whether antibiotic sensitivities were performed between compliant and noncompliant groups. Significant differences in adherence were found between obstetric clinics (high-risk obstetrics clinic, maternal‒fetal medicine fellows clinic, continuity of care clinic, and faculty private clinic) (p<0.0001) and between the faculty family medicine clinic and resident family medicine clinic (p=0.001). Vancomycin prescription practice did not change significantly over the10-year period. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of adherence to Group B Streptococcus screening and treatment guidelines in pregnancy have positive implications for reducing antibiotic resistance. Given evolving guidelines, there is a need to periodically evaluate adherence and to re-educate providers about standard practices and best documentation practices. Elsevier 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10546507/ /pubmed/37791233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100028 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Santillan, Donna A. Hubb, Alexander J. Nishimura, Taryn E. Rosenfeld-O'Tool, Sandra R. Schroeder, Kathleen J. Conklin, Jona M. Karras, Alexandra E. Gumusoglu, Serena B. Brandt, Debra S. Miller, Emily Hunter, Stephen K. Santillan, Mark K. Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title | Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title_full | Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title_fullStr | Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title_short | Group B Streptococcus Screening and Treatment Adherence in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Opportunities for Improvement |
title_sort | group b streptococcus screening and treatment adherence in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study and opportunities for improvement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santillandonnaa groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT hubbalexanderj groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT nishimurataryne groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT rosenfeldotoolsandrar groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT schroederkathleenj groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT conklinjonam groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT karrasalexandrae groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT gumusogluserenab groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT brandtdebras groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT milleremily groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT hunterstephenk groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement AT santillanmarkk groupbstreptococcusscreeningandtreatmentadherenceinpregnancyaretrospectivecohortstudyandopportunitiesforimprovement |