Reduced Risk of Syphilis Reinfection in Men Interviewed by Disease Intervention Specialists: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Syphilis is a highly transmissible sexually transmitted infection. Rising rates of infection and reinfection are of great concern to public health officials. In local health departments across the U.S., disease intervention specialists attempt to interview all people diagnosed with early syphilis, to elicit sexual partner information, and to trace and treat the partners. This method of interviewing and contact tracing is an evidence-based practice that reduces the spread of the disease in the community, but few studies address the relationship between the disease intervention specialists' interviews and index patient reinfections. We hypothesized that patients who were interviewed, patients who provided partner information, and patients with more treated partners would have a reduced risk of reinfection. METHODS: Our sample consisted of 82 men listed in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services syphilis log who were diagnosed with primary, secondary, or early latent syphilis. We determined whether and when the patients were reinfected during a set time period, from 2016 to 2020. Kaplan–Meier analyses with log-rank statistics and Cox hazard proportional models were used to calculate time to reinfection and hazard ratios. RESULTS: Although none of the models produced p<0.05, notable trends were observed. In subset analyses of interviewed patients, 23.8% of patients who named partners were reinfected during the study period, whereas 50% of those who did not name partners were reinfected during that time. In addition, the hazard ratio for index patients who named partners was 0.51 (95% CI=0.225, 1.170, p=0.113). When some or all the patients’ partners were treated, 20% were reinfected by the end of the study, whereas 33.3% of cases with no partners treated were reinfected by the end of the study. The hazard ratio for patients with some or all partners treated was 0.48 (95% CI=0.136, 1.711, p=0.258). CONCLUSIONS: Although none of the results was statistically significant, trends suggest that partner elicitation and partner treatment status could be associated with reduced risk of syphilis reinfection. Because this pilot study utilized a small convenience sample that was not tested for statistical power, we could not adequately address these trends. Future studies, with larger sample sizes, should address these relationships.