Cargando…

Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems such as Kaiser Permanente are increasingly focusing on patients’ social health. However, there is limited evidence to guide social health integration strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify social health research opportunities using a stakeholder-driven p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Meagan C., Paolino, Andrea R., Dorsey, Caitlin N., Kelly, Cheryl, Lewis, Cara C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100101
_version_ 1785114882326134784
author Brown, Meagan C.
Paolino, Andrea R.
Dorsey, Caitlin N.
Kelly, Cheryl
Lewis, Cara C.
author_facet Brown, Meagan C.
Paolino, Andrea R.
Dorsey, Caitlin N.
Kelly, Cheryl
Lewis, Cara C.
author_sort Brown, Meagan C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems such as Kaiser Permanente are increasingly focusing on patients’ social health. However, there is limited evidence to guide social health integration strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify social health research opportunities using a stakeholder-driven process. METHODS: A modified Concept Mapping approach was implemented from June 2021 to February 2022. Stakeholders (n=746) received the prompt, “One thing I wish we knew more about to advance my work addressing social health...” An inductive content analysis approach was used to assign topics and synthesize and refine research-focused statements into research questions. Questions were then rated on impact and priority by researcher stakeholders (n=16). Mean impact and priority scores and an overall combined score were calculated. Question rankings were generated using the combined score. RESULTS: Brainstorming produced 148 research-focused statements. A final list of 59 research questions was generated for rating. Question topics were (1) Data, Measures, and Metrics; (2) Intervention Approach and Impact; (3) Technology; (4) Role of Healthcare Systems; (5) Community-Based Organizations; (6) Equity; (7) Funding; and (8) Social Health Integration. On a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high), the mean impact score was 6.12 (range=4.14–7.79), and the mean priority score was 5.61 (range=3.07–8.64). Twenty-four statements were rated as both high impact (>6.12) and high priority (>5.61). CONCLUSIONS: The broad range of topics with high impact and priority scores reveals how nascent the evidence base is, with fundamental research on the nature of social risk and health system involvement still needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105465472023-10-03 Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda Brown, Meagan C. Paolino, Andrea R. Dorsey, Caitlin N. Kelly, Cheryl Lewis, Cara C. AJPM Focus TranslationAL Science INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems such as Kaiser Permanente are increasingly focusing on patients’ social health. However, there is limited evidence to guide social health integration strategy. The purpose of this study was to identify social health research opportunities using a stakeholder-driven process. METHODS: A modified Concept Mapping approach was implemented from June 2021 to February 2022. Stakeholders (n=746) received the prompt, “One thing I wish we knew more about to advance my work addressing social health...” An inductive content analysis approach was used to assign topics and synthesize and refine research-focused statements into research questions. Questions were then rated on impact and priority by researcher stakeholders (n=16). Mean impact and priority scores and an overall combined score were calculated. Question rankings were generated using the combined score. RESULTS: Brainstorming produced 148 research-focused statements. A final list of 59 research questions was generated for rating. Question topics were (1) Data, Measures, and Metrics; (2) Intervention Approach and Impact; (3) Technology; (4) Role of Healthcare Systems; (5) Community-Based Organizations; (6) Equity; (7) Funding; and (8) Social Health Integration. On a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high), the mean impact score was 6.12 (range=4.14–7.79), and the mean priority score was 5.61 (range=3.07–8.64). Twenty-four statements were rated as both high impact (>6.12) and high priority (>5.61). CONCLUSIONS: The broad range of topics with high impact and priority scores reveals how nascent the evidence base is, with fundamental research on the nature of social risk and health system involvement still needed. Elsevier 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10546547/ /pubmed/37790674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100101 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle TranslationAL Science
Brown, Meagan C.
Paolino, Andrea R.
Dorsey, Caitlin N.
Kelly, Cheryl
Lewis, Cara C.
Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title_full Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title_fullStr Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title_full_unstemmed Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title_short Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda
title_sort kaiser permanente's social needs network for evaluation and translation empirical research agenda
topic TranslationAL Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100101
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmeaganc kaiserpermanentessocialneedsnetworkforevaluationandtranslationempiricalresearchagenda
AT paolinoandrear kaiserpermanentessocialneedsnetworkforevaluationandtranslationempiricalresearchagenda
AT dorseycaitlinn kaiserpermanentessocialneedsnetworkforevaluationandtranslationempiricalresearchagenda
AT kellycheryl kaiserpermanentessocialneedsnetworkforevaluationandtranslationempiricalresearchagenda
AT lewiscarac kaiserpermanentessocialneedsnetworkforevaluationandtranslationempiricalresearchagenda