Cargando…
Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey
INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the followin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052 |
_version_ | 1785114885110104064 |
---|---|
author | Teitler, Julien O. Chegwin, Valentina Li, Linda Liu, Kayuet Bearman, Peter S. Gorney-Daley, Marilyn A. Reichman, Nancy E. |
author_facet | Teitler, Julien O. Chegwin, Valentina Li, Linda Liu, Kayuet Bearman, Peter S. Gorney-Daley, Marilyn A. Reichman, Nancy E. |
author_sort | Teitler, Julien O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the following questions: (1) what is the prevalence of elective deliveries at the population level?, (2) how has that changed over time?, and (3) to what extent do the rates of elective deliveries vary across the population? METHODS: We first documented long-term trends in cesarean sections in the U.S., California, and New Jersey. We then used linked birth and hospital discharge records and an algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines to identify low-risk pregnancies and document trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey over a recent 2-decade period, overall and by maternal characteristics and gestational age. RESULTS: In low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey, rates of cesarean sections and inductions increased sharply from the early 1990s through the mid-2000s, peaked at 33% in California and 41% in New Jersey in 2007, and then declined somewhat, and the proportions of inductions that were followed by cesarean sections increased from fewer than 1 in 5 to about 1 in 4. More education, non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, U.S.-born status, and non-Medicaid were associated with higher rates of interventions. Trends were similar across all socioeconomic groups, but differences have been narrowing in California. Among early-term (gestational age of 37–38 weeks) births in low-risk pregnancies, the rates of elective deliveries increased substantially in both states until the mid/late-2000s, peaked at about 35% in California and over 40% in New Jersey, and then decreased in both states to about 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Given established health risks of nonmedically necessary cesarean sections, that a nontrivial share of induced deliveries in low-risk pregnancies result in cesarean sections, and that interventions in low-risk pregnancies have not substantially declined since their peak in the mid-2000s, the trends documented in this paper suggest that sustained, even increased, public health attention is needed to address the still-too-high rates of cesarean sections and inductions in the U.S. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10546565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105465652023-10-03 Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey Teitler, Julien O. Chegwin, Valentina Li, Linda Liu, Kayuet Bearman, Peter S. Gorney-Daley, Marilyn A. Reichman, Nancy E. AJPM Focus Research Article INTRODUCTION: Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the following questions: (1) what is the prevalence of elective deliveries at the population level?, (2) how has that changed over time?, and (3) to what extent do the rates of elective deliveries vary across the population? METHODS: We first documented long-term trends in cesarean sections in the U.S., California, and New Jersey. We then used linked birth and hospital discharge records and an algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines to identify low-risk pregnancies and document trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey over a recent 2-decade period, overall and by maternal characteristics and gestational age. RESULTS: In low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey, rates of cesarean sections and inductions increased sharply from the early 1990s through the mid-2000s, peaked at 33% in California and 41% in New Jersey in 2007, and then declined somewhat, and the proportions of inductions that were followed by cesarean sections increased from fewer than 1 in 5 to about 1 in 4. More education, non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, U.S.-born status, and non-Medicaid were associated with higher rates of interventions. Trends were similar across all socioeconomic groups, but differences have been narrowing in California. Among early-term (gestational age of 37–38 weeks) births in low-risk pregnancies, the rates of elective deliveries increased substantially in both states until the mid/late-2000s, peaked at about 35% in California and over 40% in New Jersey, and then decreased in both states to about 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Given established health risks of nonmedically necessary cesarean sections, that a nontrivial share of induced deliveries in low-risk pregnancies result in cesarean sections, and that interventions in low-risk pregnancies have not substantially declined since their peak in the mid-2000s, the trends documented in this paper suggest that sustained, even increased, public health attention is needed to address the still-too-high rates of cesarean sections and inductions in the U.S. Elsevier 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10546565/ /pubmed/37789944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Teitler, Julien O. Chegwin, Valentina Li, Linda Liu, Kayuet Bearman, Peter S. Gorney-Daley, Marilyn A. Reichman, Nancy E. Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title | Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title_full | Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title_fullStr | Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title_short | Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey |
title_sort | trends in elective deliveries in california and new jersey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teitlerjulieno trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT chegwinvalentina trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT lilinda trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT liukayuet trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT bearmanpeters trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT gorneydaleymarilyna trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey AT reichmannancye trendsinelectivedeliveriesincaliforniaandnewjersey |