Cargando…

Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results when the outflow of the hepatic vein (HV) is obstructed. BCS patients exhibiting an accessory HV (AHV) that is dilated but obstructed can achieve significant alleviation of liver congestion after undergoing AHV recanalization. This meta-analysis was dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lv, Lu-Lu, Xu, Han-Bo, Li, Sheng-Li, Xu, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02969-z
_version_ 1785114925518028800
author Lv, Lu-Lu
Xu, Han-Bo
Li, Sheng-Li
Xu, Peng
author_facet Lv, Lu-Lu
Xu, Han-Bo
Li, Sheng-Li
Xu, Peng
author_sort Lv, Lu-Lu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results when the outflow of the hepatic vein (HV) is obstructed. BCS patients exhibiting an accessory HV (AHV) that is dilated but obstructed can achieve significant alleviation of liver congestion after undergoing AHV recanalization. This meta-analysis was developed to explore the clinical efficacy of AHV recanalization in patients with BCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies published as of November 2022, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for pooled endpoint analyses. RESULTS: Twelve total studies were identified for analysis. Pooled primary clinical success, re-stenosis, 1- and 5-year primary patency, 1- and 5-year secondary patency, 1-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year OS rates of patients in these studies following AHV recanalization were 96%, 17%, 91%, 75%, 98%, 91%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. Patients also exhibited a significant reduction in AHV pressure after recanalization relative to preoperative levels (P < 0.00001). Endpoints exhibiting significant heterogeneity among these studies included, AHV pressure (I(2) = 95%), 1-year primary patency (I(2) = 51.2%), and 5-year primary patency (I(2) = 62.4%). Relative to HV recanalization, AHV recanalization was related to a lower rate of re-stenosis (P = 0.002) and longer primary patency (P < 0.00001), but was not associated with any improvements in clinical success (P = 0.88) or OS (P = 0.29) relative to HV recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis highlights AHV recanalization as an effective means of achieving positive long-term outcomes in patients affected by BCS, potentially achieving better long-term results than those associated with HV recanalization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02969-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105467482023-10-04 Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lv, Lu-Lu Xu, Han-Bo Li, Sheng-Li Xu, Peng BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) results when the outflow of the hepatic vein (HV) is obstructed. BCS patients exhibiting an accessory HV (AHV) that is dilated but obstructed can achieve significant alleviation of liver congestion after undergoing AHV recanalization. This meta-analysis was developed to explore the clinical efficacy of AHV recanalization in patients with BCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant studies published as of November 2022, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for pooled endpoint analyses. RESULTS: Twelve total studies were identified for analysis. Pooled primary clinical success, re-stenosis, 1- and 5-year primary patency, 1- and 5-year secondary patency, 1-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year OS rates of patients in these studies following AHV recanalization were 96%, 17%, 91%, 75%, 98%, 91%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. Patients also exhibited a significant reduction in AHV pressure after recanalization relative to preoperative levels (P < 0.00001). Endpoints exhibiting significant heterogeneity among these studies included, AHV pressure (I(2) = 95%), 1-year primary patency (I(2) = 51.2%), and 5-year primary patency (I(2) = 62.4%). Relative to HV recanalization, AHV recanalization was related to a lower rate of re-stenosis (P = 0.002) and longer primary patency (P < 0.00001), but was not associated with any improvements in clinical success (P = 0.88) or OS (P = 0.29) relative to HV recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis highlights AHV recanalization as an effective means of achieving positive long-term outcomes in patients affected by BCS, potentially achieving better long-term results than those associated with HV recanalization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-023-02969-z. BioMed Central 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10546748/ /pubmed/37784064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02969-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lv, Lu-Lu
Xu, Han-Bo
Li, Sheng-Li
Xu, Peng
Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accessory hepatic vein recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accessory hepatic vein recanalization for budd-chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02969-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lvlulu accessoryhepaticveinrecanalizationforbuddchiarisyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuhanbo accessoryhepaticveinrecanalizationforbuddchiarisyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lishengli accessoryhepaticveinrecanalizationforbuddchiarisyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xupeng accessoryhepaticveinrecanalizationforbuddchiarisyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis