Cargando…
Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: The non-punitive approach to error investigation in most safety culture surveys have been relatively low. Most of the current patient safety culture measurement tools also lack the ability to directly gauge concepts important to a just culture (i.e. perceptions of fairness and trust). Th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01478-4 |
_version_ | 1785114935609524224 |
---|---|
author | Logroño, Kenneth Jun Al-Lenjawi, Badriya Abdulla Singh, Kalpana Alomari, Albara |
author_facet | Logroño, Kenneth Jun Al-Lenjawi, Badriya Abdulla Singh, Kalpana Alomari, Albara |
author_sort | Logroño, Kenneth Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The non-punitive approach to error investigation in most safety culture surveys have been relatively low. Most of the current patient safety culture measurement tools also lack the ability to directly gauge concepts important to a just culture (i.e. perceptions of fairness and trust). The purpose of this study is to assess nurses’ perceptions of the six just culture dimensions using the validated Just Culture Assessment Tool (JCAT). METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2020. Data from 212 staff nurses in a large referral hospital in Qatar were collected. A validated, self-reported survey called the JCAT was used to assess the perception of the just culture dimensions including feedback and communication, openness of communication, balance, quality of event reporting process, continuous improvement, and trust. RESULTS: The study revealed that the overall positive perception score of just culture was (75.44%). The strength areas of the just culture were “continuous improvement” dimension (88.44%), “quality of events reporting process” (86.04%), followed by “feedback and communication” (80.19%), and “openness of communication” (77.55%) The dimensions such as “trust” (68.30%) and “balance” (52.55%) had a lower positive perception rates. CONCLUSION: A strong and effective just culture is a cornerstone of any organization, particularly when it comes to ensuring safety. It places paramount importance on encouraging voluntary error reporting and establishing a robust feedback system to address safety-related events promptly. It also recognizes that errors present valuable opportunities for continuous improvement. Just culture is more than just a no-blame practice. By prioritizing accountability and responsibility among front-line workers, a just culture fosters a sense of ownership and a commitment to improve safety, rather than assigning blame. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10546793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105467932023-10-04 Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study Logroño, Kenneth Jun Al-Lenjawi, Badriya Abdulla Singh, Kalpana Alomari, Albara BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: The non-punitive approach to error investigation in most safety culture surveys have been relatively low. Most of the current patient safety culture measurement tools also lack the ability to directly gauge concepts important to a just culture (i.e. perceptions of fairness and trust). The purpose of this study is to assess nurses’ perceptions of the six just culture dimensions using the validated Just Culture Assessment Tool (JCAT). METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between November and December 2020. Data from 212 staff nurses in a large referral hospital in Qatar were collected. A validated, self-reported survey called the JCAT was used to assess the perception of the just culture dimensions including feedback and communication, openness of communication, balance, quality of event reporting process, continuous improvement, and trust. RESULTS: The study revealed that the overall positive perception score of just culture was (75.44%). The strength areas of the just culture were “continuous improvement” dimension (88.44%), “quality of events reporting process” (86.04%), followed by “feedback and communication” (80.19%), and “openness of communication” (77.55%) The dimensions such as “trust” (68.30%) and “balance” (52.55%) had a lower positive perception rates. CONCLUSION: A strong and effective just culture is a cornerstone of any organization, particularly when it comes to ensuring safety. It places paramount importance on encouraging voluntary error reporting and establishing a robust feedback system to address safety-related events promptly. It also recognizes that errors present valuable opportunities for continuous improvement. Just culture is more than just a no-blame practice. By prioritizing accountability and responsibility among front-line workers, a just culture fosters a sense of ownership and a commitment to improve safety, rather than assigning blame. BioMed Central 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10546793/ /pubmed/37789341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01478-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Logroño, Kenneth Jun Al-Lenjawi, Badriya Abdulla Singh, Kalpana Alomari, Albara Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title | Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | assessment of nurse’s perceived just culture: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01478-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT logronokennethjun assessmentofnursesperceivedjustcultureacrosssectionalstudy AT allenjawibadriyaabdulla assessmentofnursesperceivedjustcultureacrosssectionalstudy AT singhkalpana assessmentofnursesperceivedjustcultureacrosssectionalstudy AT alomarialbara assessmentofnursesperceivedjustcultureacrosssectionalstudy |