Cargando…

Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare the complication rate and the outcomes of custom-made spacers (C-spacers) and prefabricated articular spacers (P-spacers) in the treatment of periprosthetic infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 78 patients (44 females, 34 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emmer, Jan, Tomáš, Tomáš, Apostolopoulos, Vasileios, Brančík, Pavel, Rapi, Jakub, Nachtnebl, Luboš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750259
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1155
_version_ 1785114944658735104
author Emmer, Jan
Tomáš, Tomáš
Apostolopoulos, Vasileios
Brančík, Pavel
Rapi, Jakub
Nachtnebl, Luboš
author_facet Emmer, Jan
Tomáš, Tomáš
Apostolopoulos, Vasileios
Brančík, Pavel
Rapi, Jakub
Nachtnebl, Luboš
author_sort Emmer, Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare the complication rate and the outcomes of custom-made spacers (C-spacers) and prefabricated articular spacers (P-spacers) in the treatment of periprosthetic infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 78 patients (44 females, 34 males; mean age: 68.5±9.48 years; range, 47 to 82 years) with articular spacers implanted in our institution were analyzed between January 2009 and December 2019. We recorded implant results as per mechanical complications, infection control, the interval from surgery to definitive hip replacement, and the rate of achieving recovery of joint function after stage two arthroplasty. RESULTS: There were 29 revised spacers; 18 of them were C-spacers and 11 were P-spacers (p=0.0383). A total of 16 dislocations were recorded, of which six were dislocations of C-spacers, and 10 were dislocations of P-spacers (p=0.0082). Additionally, we registered four spacer breakages, all of which occurred in C-spacers (p=0.295). C-spacers failed early, at an mean interval of 2.2 weeks after implantation, and P-spacers failed later, with an mean of 9.3 weeks after implantation (p=0.0187). A total of nine reinfection complications of spacers were registered; only one infection of P-spacers, and eight infections related to C-spacers (p=0.2583). Definitive revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) after spacer explantation and successful treatment of the infection occurred in 63 cases out of 78 patients. Definitive rTHA occurred after the use of C-spacers in 41 (78%) patients and after the use of C-spacers in 22 (84%) patients (p=0.7816). C-spacers had a mean interval from spacer implantation to definitive rTHA of 6.56±6.03 months, and P-spacers had a mean interval of 4±1.93 months (p=0.0164). CONCLUSION: Custom-made spacers were shown to have lower mechanical complication rates than prefabricated ones but more infection complications. Prefabricated spacers had more dislocations and fewer breakages. Custom-made spacer mechanical failures occurred earlier compared to prefabricated ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105468442023-10-04 Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection Emmer, Jan Tomáš, Tomáš Apostolopoulos, Vasileios Brančík, Pavel Rapi, Jakub Nachtnebl, Luboš Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare the complication rate and the outcomes of custom-made spacers (C-spacers) and prefabricated articular spacers (P-spacers) in the treatment of periprosthetic infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 78 patients (44 females, 34 males; mean age: 68.5±9.48 years; range, 47 to 82 years) with articular spacers implanted in our institution were analyzed between January 2009 and December 2019. We recorded implant results as per mechanical complications, infection control, the interval from surgery to definitive hip replacement, and the rate of achieving recovery of joint function after stage two arthroplasty. RESULTS: There were 29 revised spacers; 18 of them were C-spacers and 11 were P-spacers (p=0.0383). A total of 16 dislocations were recorded, of which six were dislocations of C-spacers, and 10 were dislocations of P-spacers (p=0.0082). Additionally, we registered four spacer breakages, all of which occurred in C-spacers (p=0.295). C-spacers failed early, at an mean interval of 2.2 weeks after implantation, and P-spacers failed later, with an mean of 9.3 weeks after implantation (p=0.0187). A total of nine reinfection complications of spacers were registered; only one infection of P-spacers, and eight infections related to C-spacers (p=0.2583). Definitive revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) after spacer explantation and successful treatment of the infection occurred in 63 cases out of 78 patients. Definitive rTHA occurred after the use of C-spacers in 41 (78%) patients and after the use of C-spacers in 22 (84%) patients (p=0.7816). C-spacers had a mean interval from spacer implantation to definitive rTHA of 6.56±6.03 months, and P-spacers had a mean interval of 4±1.93 months (p=0.0164). CONCLUSION: Custom-made spacers were shown to have lower mechanical complication rates than prefabricated ones but more infection complications. Prefabricated spacers had more dislocations and fewer breakages. Custom-made spacer mechanical failures occurred earlier compared to prefabricated ones. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10546844/ /pubmed/37750259 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1155 Text en Copyright © 2023, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Emmer, Jan
Tomáš, Tomáš
Apostolopoulos, Vasileios
Brančík, Pavel
Rapi, Jakub
Nachtnebl, Luboš
Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title_full Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title_fullStr Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title_short Mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
title_sort mechanical complications and infection control comparison of custom-made and prefabricated articular hip spacers in the treatment of periprosthetic infection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750259
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1155
work_keys_str_mv AT emmerjan mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection
AT tomastomas mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection
AT apostolopoulosvasileios mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection
AT brancikpavel mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection
AT rapijakub mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection
AT nachtnebllubos mechanicalcomplicationsandinfectioncontrolcomparisonofcustommadeandprefabricatedarticularhipspacersinthetreatmentofperiprostheticinfection