Cargando…

Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of twostage flexor tendon reconstruction in Zone II of the hand and to evaluate the results of a nasogastric tube as a potential alternative to Hunter's rod. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and January 2022, a total of 45 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şahin, Erdem, Özdemir, Ali, Ergin, Musa, Durgut, Fatih, Acar, Mehmet Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750276
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1231
_version_ 1785114948682121216
author Şahin, Erdem
Özdemir, Ali
Ergin, Musa
Durgut, Fatih
Acar, Mehmet Ali
author_facet Şahin, Erdem
Özdemir, Ali
Ergin, Musa
Durgut, Fatih
Acar, Mehmet Ali
author_sort Şahin, Erdem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of twostage flexor tendon reconstruction in Zone II of the hand and to evaluate the results of a nasogastric tube as a potential alternative to Hunter's rod. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and January 2022, a total of 45 patients (26 males, 19 females; median age: 31 years; range, 12 to 61 years) who underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients 24 underwent nasogastric tube reconstruction (NT group) and 21 underwent Hunter's rod reconstruction (HR group). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, the number of surgeries, the occurrence of complications, the presence of infection during the procedure, and the range of motion of the finger joints at the final follow-up examination were recorded. The assessment of the cases was conducted using the total active motion system. RESULTS: Twenty-four digits underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction with the nasogastric tube. Among these, three index fingers, nine middle fingers, seven ring fingers, and five little fingers were operated. Twenty-one digits underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction using Hunter's rod. Among these, two index fingers, eight middle fingers, six ring fingers, and five little fingers were operated. In the NT group, excellent results were observed in 58.3% (14 digits), good results in 25% (six digits), fair results in 8.3% (two digits), and poor results in 8.3% (two digits). In the HR group, excellent results were seen in 57.1% (12 digits), good results in 33.3% (seven digits), fair results in 4.7% (one digit), and poor results in 4.7% (one digit). CONCLUSION: The utilization of a nasogastric tube offers a convenient and cost-effective option to Hunter's rod in the two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction, leading to favorable outcomes characterized by high rates of excellence and improvement, while effectively minimizing the occurrence of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105468612023-10-04 Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction Şahin, Erdem Özdemir, Ali Ergin, Musa Durgut, Fatih Acar, Mehmet Ali Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the outcomes of twostage flexor tendon reconstruction in Zone II of the hand and to evaluate the results of a nasogastric tube as a potential alternative to Hunter's rod. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2012 and January 2022, a total of 45 patients (26 males, 19 females; median age: 31 years; range, 12 to 61 years) who underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Of the patients 24 underwent nasogastric tube reconstruction (NT group) and 21 underwent Hunter's rod reconstruction (HR group). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, the number of surgeries, the occurrence of complications, the presence of infection during the procedure, and the range of motion of the finger joints at the final follow-up examination were recorded. The assessment of the cases was conducted using the total active motion system. RESULTS: Twenty-four digits underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction with the nasogastric tube. Among these, three index fingers, nine middle fingers, seven ring fingers, and five little fingers were operated. Twenty-one digits underwent two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction using Hunter's rod. Among these, two index fingers, eight middle fingers, six ring fingers, and five little fingers were operated. In the NT group, excellent results were observed in 58.3% (14 digits), good results in 25% (six digits), fair results in 8.3% (two digits), and poor results in 8.3% (two digits). In the HR group, excellent results were seen in 57.1% (12 digits), good results in 33.3% (seven digits), fair results in 4.7% (one digit), and poor results in 4.7% (one digit). CONCLUSION: The utilization of a nasogastric tube offers a convenient and cost-effective option to Hunter's rod in the two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction, leading to favorable outcomes characterized by high rates of excellence and improvement, while effectively minimizing the occurrence of complications. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10546861/ /pubmed/37750276 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1231 Text en Copyright © 2023, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Şahin, Erdem
Özdemir, Ali
Ergin, Musa
Durgut, Fatih
Acar, Mehmet Ali
Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title_full Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title_fullStr Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title_short Clinical differences between nasogastric tube and Hunter’s rod for staged Zone II flexor tendon reconstruction
title_sort clinical differences between nasogastric tube and hunter’s rod for staged zone ii flexor tendon reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37750276
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1231
work_keys_str_mv AT sahinerdem clinicaldifferencesbetweennasogastrictubeandhuntersrodforstagedzoneiiflexortendonreconstruction
AT ozdemirali clinicaldifferencesbetweennasogastrictubeandhuntersrodforstagedzoneiiflexortendonreconstruction
AT erginmusa clinicaldifferencesbetweennasogastrictubeandhuntersrodforstagedzoneiiflexortendonreconstruction
AT durgutfatih clinicaldifferencesbetweennasogastrictubeandhuntersrodforstagedzoneiiflexortendonreconstruction
AT acarmehmetali clinicaldifferencesbetweennasogastrictubeandhuntersrodforstagedzoneiiflexortendonreconstruction