Cargando…
Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index
Intracranial hematoma (ICH) volume is considered a predictor of clinical outcome and mortality rate in ICH patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The ABC/2 method for ICH volume is the standard method used to date, however, its level of accuracy has been questioned in some studies. This study c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292092 |
_version_ | 1785115002772914176 |
---|---|
author | Chaidee, Supanut Inkeaw, Papangkorn Makee, Thampaphon Khamyod, Kamoltip Angkurawaranon, Salita Traisathit, Patrinee Vaniyapong, Tanat Chitapanarux, Imjai |
author_facet | Chaidee, Supanut Inkeaw, Papangkorn Makee, Thampaphon Khamyod, Kamoltip Angkurawaranon, Salita Traisathit, Patrinee Vaniyapong, Tanat Chitapanarux, Imjai |
author_sort | Chaidee, Supanut |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracranial hematoma (ICH) volume is considered a predictor of clinical outcome and mortality rate in ICH patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The ABC/2 method for ICH volume is the standard method used to date, however, its level of accuracy has been questioned in some studies. This study compared the performance of the ABC/2 method with planimetry and truncated pyramidal methods to highlight the potential of the planimetry method applied with automatic segmentation for evaluation of epidural hematoma (EDH) and intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) volume. Six different phantoms were designed to evaluate the accuracy of volume estimation methods. 221 hematoma regions extracted from CT scans of 125 patients with head injury were also used to analyze the efficiency. The roundness index was utilized for the quantification of the ellipsoid-like shape. Regions of EDH and IPH on the CT scans were annotated by radiologists. The estimation errors for each method were statistically analyzed and compared. In addition, the relationship between the errors and roundness index was examined. The planimetry method showed the lowest relative error on phantom data. In the case of the CT scan data, the truncated pyramidal method resulted in the underestimation of the volumes of EDH and IPH. Meanwhile, the ABC/2, through principal component analysis (PCA) in the two-dimensional and PCA in the three-dimensional methods, resulted in a significant overestimation. In addition, both these approaches produced relative errors that showed a correlation with the roundness indexes for IPH. In comparison to other methods, the planimetry method had the lowest level of error with regards to calculation of the volume and it was also independent of the hematoma shape. The planimetry method, therefore, has the potential to serve as a useful tool for the assessment of ICH volume in TBI patients by using a deep learning system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10547167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105471672023-10-04 Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index Chaidee, Supanut Inkeaw, Papangkorn Makee, Thampaphon Khamyod, Kamoltip Angkurawaranon, Salita Traisathit, Patrinee Vaniyapong, Tanat Chitapanarux, Imjai PLoS One Research Article Intracranial hematoma (ICH) volume is considered a predictor of clinical outcome and mortality rate in ICH patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The ABC/2 method for ICH volume is the standard method used to date, however, its level of accuracy has been questioned in some studies. This study compared the performance of the ABC/2 method with planimetry and truncated pyramidal methods to highlight the potential of the planimetry method applied with automatic segmentation for evaluation of epidural hematoma (EDH) and intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) volume. Six different phantoms were designed to evaluate the accuracy of volume estimation methods. 221 hematoma regions extracted from CT scans of 125 patients with head injury were also used to analyze the efficiency. The roundness index was utilized for the quantification of the ellipsoid-like shape. Regions of EDH and IPH on the CT scans were annotated by radiologists. The estimation errors for each method were statistically analyzed and compared. In addition, the relationship between the errors and roundness index was examined. The planimetry method showed the lowest relative error on phantom data. In the case of the CT scan data, the truncated pyramidal method resulted in the underestimation of the volumes of EDH and IPH. Meanwhile, the ABC/2, through principal component analysis (PCA) in the two-dimensional and PCA in the three-dimensional methods, resulted in a significant overestimation. In addition, both these approaches produced relative errors that showed a correlation with the roundness indexes for IPH. In comparison to other methods, the planimetry method had the lowest level of error with regards to calculation of the volume and it was also independent of the hematoma shape. The planimetry method, therefore, has the potential to serve as a useful tool for the assessment of ICH volume in TBI patients by using a deep learning system. Public Library of Science 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10547167/ /pubmed/37788246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292092 Text en © 2023 Chaidee et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chaidee, Supanut Inkeaw, Papangkorn Makee, Thampaphon Khamyod, Kamoltip Angkurawaranon, Salita Traisathit, Patrinee Vaniyapong, Tanat Chitapanarux, Imjai Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title | Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title_full | Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title_short | Comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
title_sort | comparative analysis between different volumetric methods on measuring intracranial hemorrhage incorporating roundness index |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37788246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaideesupanut comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT inkeawpapangkorn comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT makeethampaphon comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT khamyodkamoltip comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT angkurawaranonsalita comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT traisathitpatrinee comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT vaniyapongtanat comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex AT chitapanaruximjai comparativeanalysisbetweendifferentvolumetricmethodsonmeasuringintracranialhemorrhageincorporatingroundnessindex |