Cargando…
EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gastric varices (GVs) are associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled bleeding and death when compared with esophageal varices. While endoscopic glue injection therapy has been traditionally used for secondary prophylaxis in GV, data regarding primary prophylaxis continu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000017 |
_version_ | 1785115019130699776 |
---|---|
author | Chandan, Saurabh Nguyen, Andrew Khoi Mohan, Babu P. Deliwala, Smit Ramai, Daryl Kassab, Lena L. Muthusamy, Arunkumar Facciorusso, Antonio Kamal, Faisal Bilal, Mohammad Samanta, Jayanta Adler, Douglas G. |
author_facet | Chandan, Saurabh Nguyen, Andrew Khoi Mohan, Babu P. Deliwala, Smit Ramai, Daryl Kassab, Lena L. Muthusamy, Arunkumar Facciorusso, Antonio Kamal, Faisal Bilal, Mohammad Samanta, Jayanta Adler, Douglas G. |
author_sort | Chandan, Saurabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gastric varices (GVs) are associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled bleeding and death when compared with esophageal varices. While endoscopic glue injection therapy has been traditionally used for secondary prophylaxis in GV, data regarding primary prophylaxis continue to emerge. Recently, EUS–guided therapies have been used in GV bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of several major databases from inception to June 2022. Our primary goals were to estimate the pooled rates of treatment efficacy, GV obliteration, GV recurrence, and rebleeding with EUS-guided therapy in primary and secondary prophylaxis. Overall adverse events and technical failures were assessed. Random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) % statistics. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 604 patients were included. In primary prophylaxis, pooled rate of GV obliteration was 90.2% (confidence interval [CI], 81.1–95.2; I(2) = 0). With combination EUS–glue and coil therapy, the rate was 95.4% (CI, 86.7%–98.5%; I(2) = 0). Pooled rate of posttherapy GV bleeding was 4.9% (CI, 1.8%–12.4%; I(2) = 0). In secondary prophylaxis, pooled rate of treatment efficacy was 91.9% (CI, 86.8%–95.2%; I(2) = 12). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS–glue and coil, the rates were 94.3% (CI, 88.9%–97.1%; I(2) = 0), 95.5% (CI, 80.3%–99.1%; I(2) = 0), and 88.7% (CI, 76%–95.1%; I(2) = 14), respectively. Pooled rate of GV obliteration was 83.6% (CI, 71.5%–91.2%; I(2) = 74). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS–glue and coil, the rates were 84.6% (CI, 75.9%–90.6%; I(2) = 31), 92.3% (CI, 81.1%–97.1%; I(2) = 0), and 84.5% (CI, 50.8%–96.7%; I(2) = 75), respectively. Pooled rates of GV rebleeding and recurrence were 18.1% (CI, 13.1%–24.3%; I(2) = 16) and 20.6% (CI, 9.3%–39.5%; I(2) = 66), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that EUS-guided therapy for GVs is technically feasible and clinically successful in both primary and secondary prophylaxis of GV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10547242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105472422023-10-04 EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Chandan, Saurabh Nguyen, Andrew Khoi Mohan, Babu P. Deliwala, Smit Ramai, Daryl Kassab, Lena L. Muthusamy, Arunkumar Facciorusso, Antonio Kamal, Faisal Bilal, Mohammad Samanta, Jayanta Adler, Douglas G. Endosc Ultrasound Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gastric varices (GVs) are associated with a higher risk of uncontrolled bleeding and death when compared with esophageal varices. While endoscopic glue injection therapy has been traditionally used for secondary prophylaxis in GV, data regarding primary prophylaxis continue to emerge. Recently, EUS–guided therapies have been used in GV bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of several major databases from inception to June 2022. Our primary goals were to estimate the pooled rates of treatment efficacy, GV obliteration, GV recurrence, and rebleeding with EUS-guided therapy in primary and secondary prophylaxis. Overall adverse events and technical failures were assessed. Random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) % statistics. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 604 patients were included. In primary prophylaxis, pooled rate of GV obliteration was 90.2% (confidence interval [CI], 81.1–95.2; I(2) = 0). With combination EUS–glue and coil therapy, the rate was 95.4% (CI, 86.7%–98.5%; I(2) = 0). Pooled rate of posttherapy GV bleeding was 4.9% (CI, 1.8%–12.4%; I(2) = 0). In secondary prophylaxis, pooled rate of treatment efficacy was 91.9% (CI, 86.8%–95.2%; I(2) = 12). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS–glue and coil, the rates were 94.3% (CI, 88.9%–97.1%; I(2) = 0), 95.5% (CI, 80.3%–99.1%; I(2) = 0), and 88.7% (CI, 76%–95.1%; I(2) = 14), respectively. Pooled rate of GV obliteration was 83.6% (CI, 71.5%–91.2%; I(2) = 74). With EUS-glue, EUS-coil, and combination EUS–glue and coil, the rates were 84.6% (CI, 75.9%–90.6%; I(2) = 31), 92.3% (CI, 81.1%–97.1%; I(2) = 0), and 84.5% (CI, 50.8%–96.7%; I(2) = 75), respectively. Pooled rates of GV rebleeding and recurrence were 18.1% (CI, 13.1%–24.3%; I(2) = 16) and 20.6% (CI, 9.3%–39.5%; I(2) = 66), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that EUS-guided therapy for GVs is technically feasible and clinically successful in both primary and secondary prophylaxis of GV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023 2023-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10547242/ /pubmed/37795350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000017 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Chandan, Saurabh Nguyen, Andrew Khoi Mohan, Babu P. Deliwala, Smit Ramai, Daryl Kassab, Lena L. Muthusamy, Arunkumar Facciorusso, Antonio Kamal, Faisal Bilal, Mohammad Samanta, Jayanta Adler, Douglas G. EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | EUS–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | eus–guided therapies for primary and secondary prophylaxis in gastric varices—an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandansaurabh eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nguyenandrewkhoi eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohanbabup eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT deliwalasmit eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramaidaryl eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kassablenal eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muthusamyarunkumar eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT facciorussoantonio eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kamalfaisal eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bilalmohammad eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT samantajayanta eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT adlerdouglasg eusguidedtherapiesforprimaryandsecondaryprophylaxisingastricvaricesanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |