Cargando…

Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louka, Anna Maria, Nagraj, Sanjana, Adamou, Anastasia T., Perlepe, Kalliopi, Godefroy, Olivier, Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc, Palaiodimos, Leonidas, Ntaios, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479
_version_ 1785115024050618368
author Louka, Anna Maria
Nagraj, Sanjana
Adamou, Anastasia T.
Perlepe, Kalliopi
Godefroy, Olivier
Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc
Palaiodimos, Leonidas
Ntaios, George
author_facet Louka, Anna Maria
Nagraj, Sanjana
Adamou, Anastasia T.
Perlepe, Kalliopi
Godefroy, Olivier
Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc
Palaiodimos, Leonidas
Ntaios, George
author_sort Louka, Anna Maria
collection PubMed
description Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the field by identifying risk scores proposed for this purpose, assessing their characteristics and the cohorts in which they were developed and validated, and scrutinizing their predictive performance. We identified 11 risk scores, of which 4 were externally validated. The most frequent variables included were echocardiographic markers and demographics. The areas under the curve ranged between 0.70 and 0.94. The 3 scores with the highest area under the curve were the Decryptoring (0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]), newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.94]), and AF‐ESUS (Atrial Fibrillation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) (0.85 [95% CI, 0.80–0.87]), of which only the latter was externally validated. Risk stratification scores can guide a personalized approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring after embolic stroke of undetermined source.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105472682023-10-04 Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Louka, Anna Maria Nagraj, Sanjana Adamou, Anastasia T. Perlepe, Kalliopi Godefroy, Olivier Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc Palaiodimos, Leonidas Ntaios, George J Am Heart Assoc Contemporary Reviews Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the field by identifying risk scores proposed for this purpose, assessing their characteristics and the cohorts in which they were developed and validated, and scrutinizing their predictive performance. We identified 11 risk scores, of which 4 were externally validated. The most frequent variables included were echocardiographic markers and demographics. The areas under the curve ranged between 0.70 and 0.94. The 3 scores with the highest area under the curve were the Decryptoring (0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]), newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.94]), and AF‐ESUS (Atrial Fibrillation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) (0.85 [95% CI, 0.80–0.87]), of which only the latter was externally validated. Risk stratification scores can guide a personalized approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring after embolic stroke of undetermined source. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10547268/ /pubmed/37681521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Contemporary Reviews
Louka, Anna Maria
Nagraj, Sanjana
Adamou, Anastasia T.
Perlepe, Kalliopi
Godefroy, Olivier
Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc
Palaiodimos, Leonidas
Ntaios, George
Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title_full Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title_fullStr Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title_short Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
title_sort risk stratification tools to guide a personalized approach for cardiac monitoring in embolic stroke of undetermined source
topic Contemporary Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479
work_keys_str_mv AT loukaannamaria riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT nagrajsanjana riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT adamouanastasiat riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT perlepekalliopi riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT godefroyolivier riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT bugnicourtjeanmarc riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT palaiodimosleonidas riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource
AT ntaiosgeorge riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource