Cargando…
Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479 |
_version_ | 1785115024050618368 |
---|---|
author | Louka, Anna Maria Nagraj, Sanjana Adamou, Anastasia T. Perlepe, Kalliopi Godefroy, Olivier Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc Palaiodimos, Leonidas Ntaios, George |
author_facet | Louka, Anna Maria Nagraj, Sanjana Adamou, Anastasia T. Perlepe, Kalliopi Godefroy, Olivier Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc Palaiodimos, Leonidas Ntaios, George |
author_sort | Louka, Anna Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the field by identifying risk scores proposed for this purpose, assessing their characteristics and the cohorts in which they were developed and validated, and scrutinizing their predictive performance. We identified 11 risk scores, of which 4 were externally validated. The most frequent variables included were echocardiographic markers and demographics. The areas under the curve ranged between 0.70 and 0.94. The 3 scores with the highest area under the curve were the Decryptoring (0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]), newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.94]), and AF‐ESUS (Atrial Fibrillation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) (0.85 [95% CI, 0.80–0.87]), of which only the latter was externally validated. Risk stratification scores can guide a personalized approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring after embolic stroke of undetermined source. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10547268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105472682023-10-04 Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Louka, Anna Maria Nagraj, Sanjana Adamou, Anastasia T. Perlepe, Kalliopi Godefroy, Olivier Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc Palaiodimos, Leonidas Ntaios, George J Am Heart Assoc Contemporary Reviews Current recommendations support a personalized sequential approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. Several risk stratification scores have been proposed to predict the likelihood of atrial fibrillation after embolic stroke of undetermined source. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the field by identifying risk scores proposed for this purpose, assessing their characteristics and the cohorts in which they were developed and validated, and scrutinizing their predictive performance. We identified 11 risk scores, of which 4 were externally validated. The most frequent variables included were echocardiographic markers and demographics. The areas under the curve ranged between 0.70 and 0.94. The 3 scores with the highest area under the curve were the Decryptoring (0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]), newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (0.87 [95% CI, 0.79–0.94]), and AF‐ESUS (Atrial Fibrillation in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) (0.85 [95% CI, 0.80–0.87]), of which only the latter was externally validated. Risk stratification scores can guide a personalized approach for cardiac rhythm monitoring after embolic stroke of undetermined source. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10547268/ /pubmed/37681521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Contemporary Reviews Louka, Anna Maria Nagraj, Sanjana Adamou, Anastasia T. Perlepe, Kalliopi Godefroy, Olivier Bugnicourt, Jean‐Marc Palaiodimos, Leonidas Ntaios, George Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title | Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title_full | Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title_fullStr | Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title_short | Risk Stratification Tools to Guide a Personalized Approach for Cardiac Monitoring in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source |
title_sort | risk stratification tools to guide a personalized approach for cardiac monitoring in embolic stroke of undetermined source |
topic | Contemporary Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37681521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loukaannamaria riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT nagrajsanjana riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT adamouanastasiat riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT perlepekalliopi riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT godefroyolivier riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT bugnicourtjeanmarc riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT palaiodimosleonidas riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource AT ntaiosgeorge riskstratificationtoolstoguideapersonalizedapproachforcardiacmonitoringinembolicstrokeofundeterminedsource |