Cargando…
Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure
BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis used baseline assessments from a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.029999 |
_version_ | 1785115036829614080 |
---|---|
author | Barone Gibbs, Bethany Muldoon, Matthew F. Conroy, Molly B. Paley, Joshua L. Shimbo, Daichi Perera, Subashan |
author_facet | Barone Gibbs, Bethany Muldoon, Matthew F. Conroy, Molly B. Paley, Joshua L. Shimbo, Daichi Perera, Subashan |
author_sort | Barone Gibbs, Bethany |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh‐worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within‐person BP variability explained (R (2)) by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5‐minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed: 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10547321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105473212023-10-04 Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Barone Gibbs, Bethany Muldoon, Matthew F. Conroy, Molly B. Paley, Joshua L. Shimbo, Daichi Perera, Subashan J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are no recommendations for being seated versus nonseated during ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM). The authors examined how recent standing or moving versus sitting affect average daytime BP on ABPM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This analysis used baseline assessments from a clinical trial in desk workers with office systolic BP (SBP) 120 to 159 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) 80 to 99 mm Hg. ABPM was measured every 30 minutes with a SunTech Medical Oscar 2 monitor. Concurrent posture (standing or seated) and moving (steps) were measured via a thigh‐worn accelerometer. Linear regression determined within‐person BP variability explained (R (2)) by standing and steps before ABPM readings. Mean daytime BP and the prevalence of mean daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg from readings after sitting (seated) or after recent standing or moving (nonseated) were compared with all readings. Participants (n=266, 59% women; age, 45.2±11.6 years) provided 32.5±3.9 daytime BP readings. Time standing and steps before readings explained variability up to 17% for daytime SBP and 14% for daytime DBP. Using the 5‐minute prior interval, seated SBP/DBP was lower (130.8/79.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nonseated SBP/DBP was higher (137.8/84.3 mm Hg, P<0.001) than mean daytime SBP/DBP from all readings (133.9/81.6 mm Hg). The prevalence of mean daytime SBP/DBP ≥135/85 mm Hg also differed: 38.7% from seated readings, 70.3% from nonseated readings, and 52.6% from all readings (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Daytime BP was systematically higher after standing and moving compared with being seated. Individual variation in activity patterns could influence the diagnosis of high BP using daytime BP readings on ABPM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10547321/ /pubmed/37589152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.029999 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Barone Gibbs, Bethany Muldoon, Matthew F. Conroy, Molly B. Paley, Joshua L. Shimbo, Daichi Perera, Subashan Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title | Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title_full | Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title_fullStr | Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title_short | Influence of Recent Standing, Moving, or Sitting on Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure |
title_sort | influence of recent standing, moving, or sitting on daytime ambulatory blood pressure |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37589152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.029999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baronegibbsbethany influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure AT muldoonmatthewf influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure AT conroymollyb influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure AT paleyjoshual influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure AT shimbodaichi influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure AT pererasubashan influenceofrecentstandingmovingorsittingondaytimeambulatorybloodpressure |