Cargando…

Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: In patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause, and a percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a choice for temporary mechanical circulatory support. However, data are limited on complication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Yuichi, Tateishi, Kazuya, Toda, Koichi, Matsumiya, Goro, Kobayashi, Yoshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030819
_version_ 1785115046058131456
author Saito, Yuichi
Tateishi, Kazuya
Toda, Koichi
Matsumiya, Goro
Kobayashi, Yoshio
author_facet Saito, Yuichi
Tateishi, Kazuya
Toda, Koichi
Matsumiya, Goro
Kobayashi, Yoshio
author_sort Saito, Yuichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause, and a percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a choice for temporary mechanical circulatory support. However, data are limited on complications and outcomes of Impella treatment in patients with CS with and without AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide prospective registry data in Japan, we included a total of 2047 patients with CS in whom the Impella devices were successfully placed between February 2020 and December 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the primary indication for the Impella use: AMI versus non‐AMI. The primary end point was a composite of in‐hospital all‐cause death and major complications. Of the 2047 patients, the Impella was indicated for AMI in 1337 (65.3%). In the group without AMI, myocarditis was the leading cause of CS. Patients with AMI‐CS were older and more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors than those with non‐AMI‐CS. The rates of in‐hospital mortality (46.0% versus 43.9%, P=0.38) and major complications (35.2% versus 34.7%, P=0.85) were similar between the 2 groups. Overall, multivariable analysis identified older age, higher body mass index, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, and the Impella 5.0 as factors significantly associated with the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Impella in patients with and without AMI was related to similar clinical outcomes with high mortality and complication rates. Further studies are needed to identify patients who may benefit from the Impella devices in CS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/english. Identifier: UMIN000033603.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105473602023-10-04 Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction Saito, Yuichi Tateishi, Kazuya Toda, Koichi Matsumiya, Goro Kobayashi, Yoshio J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common cause, and a percutaneous microaxial ventricular assist device (Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a choice for temporary mechanical circulatory support. However, data are limited on complications and outcomes of Impella treatment in patients with CS with and without AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide prospective registry data in Japan, we included a total of 2047 patients with CS in whom the Impella devices were successfully placed between February 2020 and December 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the primary indication for the Impella use: AMI versus non‐AMI. The primary end point was a composite of in‐hospital all‐cause death and major complications. Of the 2047 patients, the Impella was indicated for AMI in 1337 (65.3%). In the group without AMI, myocarditis was the leading cause of CS. Patients with AMI‐CS were older and more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors than those with non‐AMI‐CS. The rates of in‐hospital mortality (46.0% versus 43.9%, P=0.38) and major complications (35.2% versus 34.7%, P=0.85) were similar between the 2 groups. Overall, multivariable analysis identified older age, higher body mass index, previous transient ischemic attack or stroke, out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, and the Impella 5.0 as factors significantly associated with the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Impella in patients with and without AMI was related to similar clinical outcomes with high mortality and complication rates. Further studies are needed to identify patients who may benefit from the Impella devices in CS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/english. Identifier: UMIN000033603. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10547360/ /pubmed/37646217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030819 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Saito, Yuichi
Tateishi, Kazuya
Toda, Koichi
Matsumiya, Goro
Kobayashi, Yoshio
Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_short Complications and Outcomes of Impella Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_sort complications and outcomes of impella treatment in cardiogenic shock patients with and without acute myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030819
work_keys_str_mv AT saitoyuichi complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction
AT tateishikazuya complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction
AT todakoichi complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction
AT matsumiyagoro complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction
AT kobayashiyoshio complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction
AT complicationsandoutcomesofimpellatreatmentincardiogenicshockpatientswithandwithoutacutemyocardialinfarction