Cargando…

Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint

BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases utilizes various dose fractionation schedules. The pain-relieving effects of a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) are largely debated due to the difficulty in matching patients’ backgrounds and in assessing the effectiveness of pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoki, Yuki, Nakayama, Michihiro, Nakajima, Kaori, Yamashina, Masaaki, Okizaki, Atsutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795227
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0054
_version_ 1785115057614487552
author Aoki, Yuki
Nakayama, Michihiro
Nakajima, Kaori
Yamashina, Masaaki
Okizaki, Atsutaka
author_facet Aoki, Yuki
Nakayama, Michihiro
Nakajima, Kaori
Yamashina, Masaaki
Okizaki, Atsutaka
author_sort Aoki, Yuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases utilizes various dose fractionation schedules. The pain-relieving effects of a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) are largely debated due to the difficulty in matching patients’ backgrounds and in assessing the effectiveness of pain relief. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of SF and MF palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases using propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint (ICE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 195 patients irradiated for bone metastasis. The primary endpoint was the pain-relieving effects used by ICE. In addition, the evaluation was performed by using responder (complete response/partial response) and non-responder (pain progression/indeterminate response) categorization. The secondary endpoints were the discharge or transfer rate at one month after irradiation and postirradiation pathological fracture rate. Propensity score matching was used to adjust patient’s characteristics and reduce selection bias. RESULTS: After adapting propensity score matching, the total number of patients was 74. There was no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF (p = 0.184). There were no significant differences in them between SF and MF when using responder and non-responder categorization (p = 0.163). Furthermore, there were no differences in the discharge or transfer rates (p = 0.693) and pathological fracture rates (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of propensity score matching and ICE revealed no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF for bone metastases, thus, SF has no significant disadvantage compared to MF in pain-relieving effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105474262023-10-04 Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint Aoki, Yuki Nakayama, Michihiro Nakajima, Kaori Yamashina, Masaaki Okizaki, Atsutaka Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases utilizes various dose fractionation schedules. The pain-relieving effects of a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) are largely debated due to the difficulty in matching patients’ backgrounds and in assessing the effectiveness of pain relief. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of SF and MF palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases using propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint (ICE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 195 patients irradiated for bone metastasis. The primary endpoint was the pain-relieving effects used by ICE. In addition, the evaluation was performed by using responder (complete response/partial response) and non-responder (pain progression/indeterminate response) categorization. The secondary endpoints were the discharge or transfer rate at one month after irradiation and postirradiation pathological fracture rate. Propensity score matching was used to adjust patient’s characteristics and reduce selection bias. RESULTS: After adapting propensity score matching, the total number of patients was 74. There was no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF (p = 0.184). There were no significant differences in them between SF and MF when using responder and non-responder categorization (p = 0.163). Furthermore, there were no differences in the discharge or transfer rates (p = 0.693) and pathological fracture rates (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of propensity score matching and ICE revealed no significant difference in the pain-relieving effects between SF and MF for bone metastases, thus, SF has no significant disadvantage compared to MF in pain-relieving effects. Via Medica 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10547426/ /pubmed/37795227 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0054 Text en © 2023 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Aoki, Yuki
Nakayama, Michihiro
Nakajima, Kaori
Yamashina, Masaaki
Okizaki, Atsutaka
Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title_full Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title_fullStr Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title_short Comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
title_sort comparison of pain-relieving effects by number of irradiations, through propensity score matching and the international consensus endpoint
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795227
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0054
work_keys_str_mv AT aokiyuki comparisonofpainrelievingeffectsbynumberofirradiationsthroughpropensityscorematchingandtheinternationalconsensusendpoint
AT nakayamamichihiro comparisonofpainrelievingeffectsbynumberofirradiationsthroughpropensityscorematchingandtheinternationalconsensusendpoint
AT nakajimakaori comparisonofpainrelievingeffectsbynumberofirradiationsthroughpropensityscorematchingandtheinternationalconsensusendpoint
AT yamashinamasaaki comparisonofpainrelievingeffectsbynumberofirradiationsthroughpropensityscorematchingandtheinternationalconsensusendpoint
AT okizakiatsutaka comparisonofpainrelievingeffectsbynumberofirradiationsthroughpropensityscorematchingandtheinternationalconsensusendpoint