Cargando…

Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process

Decisions about noisy stimuli are widely understood to be made by accumulating evidence up to a decision bound that can be adjusted according to task demands. However, relatively little is known about how such mechanisms operate in continuous monitoring contexts requiring intermittent target detecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geuzebroek, Anna C, Craddock, Hannah, O'Connell, Redmond G, Kelly, Simon P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646405
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83025
_version_ 1785115066106904576
author Geuzebroek, Anna C
Craddock, Hannah
O'Connell, Redmond G
Kelly, Simon P
author_facet Geuzebroek, Anna C
Craddock, Hannah
O'Connell, Redmond G
Kelly, Simon P
author_sort Geuzebroek, Anna C
collection PubMed
description Decisions about noisy stimuli are widely understood to be made by accumulating evidence up to a decision bound that can be adjusted according to task demands. However, relatively little is known about how such mechanisms operate in continuous monitoring contexts requiring intermittent target detection. Here, we examined neural decision processes underlying detection of 1 s coherence targets within continuous random dot motion, and how they are adjusted across contexts with weak, strong, or randomly mixed weak/strong targets. Our prediction was that decision bounds would be set lower when weak targets are more prevalent. Behavioural hit and false alarm rate patterns were consistent with this, and were well captured by a bound-adjustable leaky accumulator model. However, beta-band EEG signatures of motor preparation contradicted this, instead indicating lower bounds in the strong-target context. We thus tested two alternative models in which decision-bound dynamics were constrained directly by beta measurements, respectively, featuring leaky accumulation with adjustable leak, and non-leaky accumulation of evidence referenced to an adjustable sensory-level criterion. We found that the latter model best explained both behaviour and neural dynamics, highlighting novel means of decision policy regulation and the value of neurally informed modelling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105474742023-10-04 Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process Geuzebroek, Anna C Craddock, Hannah O'Connell, Redmond G Kelly, Simon P eLife Neuroscience Decisions about noisy stimuli are widely understood to be made by accumulating evidence up to a decision bound that can be adjusted according to task demands. However, relatively little is known about how such mechanisms operate in continuous monitoring contexts requiring intermittent target detection. Here, we examined neural decision processes underlying detection of 1 s coherence targets within continuous random dot motion, and how they are adjusted across contexts with weak, strong, or randomly mixed weak/strong targets. Our prediction was that decision bounds would be set lower when weak targets are more prevalent. Behavioural hit and false alarm rate patterns were consistent with this, and were well captured by a bound-adjustable leaky accumulator model. However, beta-band EEG signatures of motor preparation contradicted this, instead indicating lower bounds in the strong-target context. We thus tested two alternative models in which decision-bound dynamics were constrained directly by beta measurements, respectively, featuring leaky accumulation with adjustable leak, and non-leaky accumulation of evidence referenced to an adjustable sensory-level criterion. We found that the latter model best explained both behaviour and neural dynamics, highlighting novel means of decision policy regulation and the value of neurally informed modelling. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10547474/ /pubmed/37646405 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83025 Text en © 2023, Geuzebroek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Geuzebroek, Anna C
Craddock, Hannah
O'Connell, Redmond G
Kelly, Simon P
Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title_full Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title_fullStr Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title_full_unstemmed Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title_short Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
title_sort balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37646405
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83025
work_keys_str_mv AT geuzebroekannac balancingtrueandfalsedetectionofintermittentsensorytargetsbyadjustingtheinputstotheevidenceaccumulationprocess
AT craddockhannah balancingtrueandfalsedetectionofintermittentsensorytargetsbyadjustingtheinputstotheevidenceaccumulationprocess
AT oconnellredmondg balancingtrueandfalsedetectionofintermittentsensorytargetsbyadjustingtheinputstotheevidenceaccumulationprocess
AT kellysimonp balancingtrueandfalsedetectionofintermittentsensorytargetsbyadjustingtheinputstotheevidenceaccumulationprocess