Cargando…

Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa

Geological carbon storage provides an efficient technology for the large-scale reduction of atmospheric carbon, and the drive for net-zero emissions may necessitate the future usage of oil reservoirs for CO(2) projects (without oil production), hence, dynamic modeling of an oil reservoir for CO(2) s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afolayan, Blessing, Mackay, Eric, Opuwari, Mimonitu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43773-9
_version_ 1785115131159511040
author Afolayan, Blessing
Mackay, Eric
Opuwari, Mimonitu
author_facet Afolayan, Blessing
Mackay, Eric
Opuwari, Mimonitu
author_sort Afolayan, Blessing
collection PubMed
description Geological carbon storage provides an efficient technology for the large-scale reduction of atmospheric carbon, and the drive for net-zero emissions may necessitate the future usage of oil reservoirs for CO(2) projects (without oil production), hence, dynamic modeling of an oil reservoir for CO(2) storage in the Bredasdorp basin, South Africa, was therefore conducted. Injection into the reservoir was for 20 years (2030–2050), and 100 years (2050–2150) to study the CO(2)–brine–oil interactions, with sensitivities carried out on reservoir boundary conditions. The closed boundary scenario experienced pressure buildup with a target injection rate of 0.5 Mt/year, and a cutback on injection rate progressively until 2050 to not exceed the fracture pressure of the reservoir. The CO(2) plume migration was not rapid due to the reduced volume of CO(2) injected and the confining pressure. The system was gravity dominated, and gravity stability was not attained at the end of the simulation as fluid interfaces were not yet flat. The open boundary reservoir did not experience a pressure buildup because all boundaries were open, the target injection rate was achieved, and it was a viscous-dominated system. In both cases, the dissolution of CO(2) in oil and brine was active, and there was a growing increase of CO(2) fraction dissolved in water and oil, a decline in gaseous mobile CO(2) phase between 2050 and 2150, and active trapping mechanisms were structural trapping, dissolution in oil and water, and residual trapping. The study showed that boundary condition was very crucial to the success of the project, with direct impacts on injection rate and pressure. This pioneering study has opened a vista on the injection of CO(2) into an oil reservoir(,) and CO(2)–brine–oil interactions, with sensitivities carried out on reservoir boundary conditions in a closed and an open hydrocarbon system in South Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105477872023-10-05 Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa Afolayan, Blessing Mackay, Eric Opuwari, Mimonitu Sci Rep Article Geological carbon storage provides an efficient technology for the large-scale reduction of atmospheric carbon, and the drive for net-zero emissions may necessitate the future usage of oil reservoirs for CO(2) projects (without oil production), hence, dynamic modeling of an oil reservoir for CO(2) storage in the Bredasdorp basin, South Africa, was therefore conducted. Injection into the reservoir was for 20 years (2030–2050), and 100 years (2050–2150) to study the CO(2)–brine–oil interactions, with sensitivities carried out on reservoir boundary conditions. The closed boundary scenario experienced pressure buildup with a target injection rate of 0.5 Mt/year, and a cutback on injection rate progressively until 2050 to not exceed the fracture pressure of the reservoir. The CO(2) plume migration was not rapid due to the reduced volume of CO(2) injected and the confining pressure. The system was gravity dominated, and gravity stability was not attained at the end of the simulation as fluid interfaces were not yet flat. The open boundary reservoir did not experience a pressure buildup because all boundaries were open, the target injection rate was achieved, and it was a viscous-dominated system. In both cases, the dissolution of CO(2) in oil and brine was active, and there was a growing increase of CO(2) fraction dissolved in water and oil, a decline in gaseous mobile CO(2) phase between 2050 and 2150, and active trapping mechanisms were structural trapping, dissolution in oil and water, and residual trapping. The study showed that boundary condition was very crucial to the success of the project, with direct impacts on injection rate and pressure. This pioneering study has opened a vista on the injection of CO(2) into an oil reservoir(,) and CO(2)–brine–oil interactions, with sensitivities carried out on reservoir boundary conditions in a closed and an open hydrocarbon system in South Africa. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10547787/ /pubmed/37789140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43773-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Afolayan, Blessing
Mackay, Eric
Opuwari, Mimonitu
Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title_full Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title_fullStr Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title_short Dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, Bredasdorp Basin, South Africa
title_sort dynamic modeling of geological carbon storage in an oil reservoir, bredasdorp basin, south africa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43773-9
work_keys_str_mv AT afolayanblessing dynamicmodelingofgeologicalcarbonstorageinanoilreservoirbredasdorpbasinsouthafrica
AT mackayeric dynamicmodelingofgeologicalcarbonstorageinanoilreservoirbredasdorpbasinsouthafrica
AT opuwarimimonitu dynamicmodelingofgeologicalcarbonstorageinanoilreservoirbredasdorpbasinsouthafrica