Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of the Liverty™ transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) access set, which has an ergonomic handle that allows for in situ cannula tip deflection and a distal steerable cannula angle, versus the COOK® Rosch-Uc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, PengXu, Ma, Yujia, Zhu, Xiaoxia, Wu, Yijie, Ong, John, Liu, Pu, Xiao, Jiangqiang, Zhuge, Yuzheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03544-5
_version_ 1785115135393660928
author Ding, PengXu
Ma, Yujia
Zhu, Xiaoxia
Wu, Yijie
Ong, John
Liu, Pu
Xiao, Jiangqiang
Zhuge, Yuzheng
author_facet Ding, PengXu
Ma, Yujia
Zhu, Xiaoxia
Wu, Yijie
Ong, John
Liu, Pu
Xiao, Jiangqiang
Zhuge, Yuzheng
author_sort Ding, PengXu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of the Liverty™ transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) access set, which has an ergonomic handle that allows for in situ cannula tip deflection and a distal steerable cannula angle, versus the COOK® Rosch-Uchida Transjugular Liver Access Set (RUPS-100) in healthy pigs. METHODS: Twelve pigs randomly underwent TIPS with the Liverty™ set or the RUPS-100 set. Three interventionalists performed 4 TIPS procedures, 2 with each set. The primary outcome was procedural success, defined as successful establishment of the intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and stent placement. RESULTS: The shunt was successfully established in 11 pigs. The procedural success was achieved in all 6 pigs in the Liverty™ group and 5 out of 6 pigs for the RUPS-100 group (Fisher exact test, P > 0.999). The mean duration of puncture was shorter in the Liverty™ group versus the RUPS-100 group (12.3 ± 4.5 min vs. 16.2 ± 8.5 min), but without significant statistical difference (two sample t test, P = 0.359). The cannula angle was adjusted 69% of passes in the Liverty™ group, which was significantly higher than that in the RUPS-100 group (12%, P = 0.004). Overall, the TIPS procedural performance was comparable between the groups. Both sets were safe. No intraabdominal hemorrhage, vascular injuries, tissue or organ injuries, porto-biliary fistula, biliary peritonitis, and infection or abscess occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The Liverty™ set is safe and has similar procedural metrics to the COOK® RUPS-100 set. It allows in situ adjustment of the angle of the stiffening cannula without increasing procedure time and lessens the occurrences of periprocedural complications. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105478052023-10-05 Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model Ding, PengXu Ma, Yujia Zhu, Xiaoxia Wu, Yijie Ong, John Liu, Pu Xiao, Jiangqiang Zhuge, Yuzheng Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Laboratory Investigation PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of the Liverty™ transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) access set, which has an ergonomic handle that allows for in situ cannula tip deflection and a distal steerable cannula angle, versus the COOK® Rosch-Uchida Transjugular Liver Access Set (RUPS-100) in healthy pigs. METHODS: Twelve pigs randomly underwent TIPS with the Liverty™ set or the RUPS-100 set. Three interventionalists performed 4 TIPS procedures, 2 with each set. The primary outcome was procedural success, defined as successful establishment of the intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and stent placement. RESULTS: The shunt was successfully established in 11 pigs. The procedural success was achieved in all 6 pigs in the Liverty™ group and 5 out of 6 pigs for the RUPS-100 group (Fisher exact test, P > 0.999). The mean duration of puncture was shorter in the Liverty™ group versus the RUPS-100 group (12.3 ± 4.5 min vs. 16.2 ± 8.5 min), but without significant statistical difference (two sample t test, P = 0.359). The cannula angle was adjusted 69% of passes in the Liverty™ group, which was significantly higher than that in the RUPS-100 group (12%, P = 0.004). Overall, the TIPS procedural performance was comparable between the groups. Both sets were safe. No intraabdominal hemorrhage, vascular injuries, tissue or organ injuries, porto-biliary fistula, biliary peritonitis, and infection or abscess occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The Liverty™ set is safe and has similar procedural metrics to the COOK® RUPS-100 set. It allows in situ adjustment of the angle of the stiffening cannula without increasing procedure time and lessens the occurrences of periprocedural complications. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-09-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10547805/ /pubmed/37723354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03544-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Laboratory Investigation
Ding, PengXu
Ma, Yujia
Zhu, Xiaoxia
Wu, Yijie
Ong, John
Liu, Pu
Xiao, Jiangqiang
Zhuge, Yuzheng
Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Tips Access Set with Steerable Cannula in a Swine Model
title_sort safety and effectiveness of a novel tips access set with steerable cannula in a swine model
topic Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37723354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03544-5
work_keys_str_mv AT dingpengxu safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT mayujia safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT zhuxiaoxia safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT wuyijie safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT ongjohn safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT liupu safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT xiaojiangqiang safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel
AT zhugeyuzheng safetyandeffectivenessofanoveltipsaccesssetwithsteerablecannulainaswinemodel