Lipopolysaccharide penetration analysis of two different resin cement systems to dentin and ceramic surface

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: One of the challenges in adhesive ceramic restorations is deterioration of tooth-cement-ceramic interfaces. This study was to quantitatively investigate lipopolysaccharide (LPS) penetration through adhesive ceramic restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized holes were formed on ceramic (IPS Empress CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) and human dentin discs. Prepared discs were randomly assigned to experimental groups (n = 6/group): SC, self-adhesive resin cement (SmartCem 2, Dentsply Sirona) bonded to ceramic discs; ST, self-adhesive resin cement bonded to dentin discs; VC, etch-and-rinse resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) bonded to ceramic discs; VT, etch-and-rinse resin cement bonded to dentin discs. The specimens underwent thermocycling (10,000 cycles; 5–55 °C) then LPS penetration test until 5-weeks. A mixed effect analysis using R statistical language was performed for data analysis. RESULTS: Dentin and ceramic bonded with etch-and-rinse resin cements (groups VT and VC) showed significantly less penetration than those with self-adhesive resin cement (groups ST and SC) (P < 0.05). ST showed significantly lower penetration than SC (P < 0.05), that showed similar penetration with positive control (P > 0.05). VC showed minimal penetration during observed time of period (P < 0.05). Scanning electron microscope observations showed different interfacial characteristics among the groups. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, etch-and-rinse resin cement showed less LPS penetration than self-adhesive resin cement on both ceramic and dentin surfaces.