Cargando…

Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Effects of implant angulation on digital impression accuracy remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the alteration of implant scan bodies and the trueness of digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary typodont without t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uzel, Sema Merve, Guncu, Mustafa Baris, Aktas, Guliz, Arikan, Hale, Reiss, Natalia, Turkyilmaz, Ilser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.004
_version_ 1785115179649859584
author Uzel, Sema Merve
Guncu, Mustafa Baris
Aktas, Guliz
Arikan, Hale
Reiss, Natalia
Turkyilmaz, Ilser
author_facet Uzel, Sema Merve
Guncu, Mustafa Baris
Aktas, Guliz
Arikan, Hale
Reiss, Natalia
Turkyilmaz, Ilser
author_sort Uzel, Sema Merve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Effects of implant angulation on digital impression accuracy remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the alteration of implant scan bodies and the trueness of digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary typodont without the right premolars and first molar was scanned with a laboratory scanner and saved as a standard triangular language (STL) file. A model from the STL file was fabricated with a 3-dimensional printer. Two implants were placed into the first premolar and first molar sites of the model, followed by the insertion of two scan bodies onto the implants. These scan bodies were divided into four test groups, based on the surface modifications. A digital impression of each typodont was made with three different intraoral scanners. An abutment was digitally seated on each implant. 120 STL files (30 for each group) of the typodont with two implants and two corresponding abutments were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 240 values (two implants for each typodont) were obtained after each sample (4 groups) was scanned 10 times by utilizing three intraoral scanners. The overall linear and angular discrepancies were analyzed. Group 1 showed the lowest linear discrepancy of 14.9 ± 5.4 μm while Group 4 reported the highest linear discrepancy of 137.5 ± 41.7 μm, yielding a statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It has been concluded that the more adjustments made to the scan bodies, the greater the linear and angular deviations occur, compromising the trueness of the digital implant impression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10547997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105479972023-10-05 Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions Uzel, Sema Merve Guncu, Mustafa Baris Aktas, Guliz Arikan, Hale Reiss, Natalia Turkyilmaz, Ilser J Dent Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Effects of implant angulation on digital impression accuracy remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the alteration of implant scan bodies and the trueness of digital impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary typodont without the right premolars and first molar was scanned with a laboratory scanner and saved as a standard triangular language (STL) file. A model from the STL file was fabricated with a 3-dimensional printer. Two implants were placed into the first premolar and first molar sites of the model, followed by the insertion of two scan bodies onto the implants. These scan bodies were divided into four test groups, based on the surface modifications. A digital impression of each typodont was made with three different intraoral scanners. An abutment was digitally seated on each implant. 120 STL files (30 for each group) of the typodont with two implants and two corresponding abutments were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 240 values (two implants for each typodont) were obtained after each sample (4 groups) was scanned 10 times by utilizing three intraoral scanners. The overall linear and angular discrepancies were analyzed. Group 1 showed the lowest linear discrepancy of 14.9 ± 5.4 μm while Group 4 reported the highest linear discrepancy of 137.5 ± 41.7 μm, yielding a statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: It has been concluded that the more adjustments made to the scan bodies, the greater the linear and angular deviations occur, compromising the trueness of the digital implant impression. Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China 2023-10 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10547997/ /pubmed/37799878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.004 Text en © 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Uzel, Sema Merve
Guncu, Mustafa Baris
Aktas, Guliz
Arikan, Hale
Reiss, Natalia
Turkyilmaz, Ilser
Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title_full Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title_fullStr Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title_short Influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
title_sort influence of the implant scan body modifications on trueness of digital impressions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10547997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT uzelsemamerve influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions
AT guncumustafabaris influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions
AT aktasguliz influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions
AT arikanhale influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions
AT reissnatalia influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions
AT turkyilmazilser influenceoftheimplantscanbodymodificationsontruenessofdigitalimpressions