Cargando…

Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawada, Masafumi, Shiraishi, Yutaka, Toyama, Hirofumi, Tanaka, Tomoki, Kota, Ryuichi, Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842
_version_ 1785115268212588544
author Sawada, Masafumi
Shiraishi, Yutaka
Toyama, Hirofumi
Tanaka, Tomoki
Kota, Ryuichi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_facet Sawada, Masafumi
Shiraishi, Yutaka
Toyama, Hirofumi
Tanaka, Tomoki
Kota, Ryuichi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
author_sort Sawada, Masafumi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D(90)) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm(3) of other organs at risk (D(2cm(3))) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D(90) of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, p = 0.172). The D(2cm(3)) values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, p = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR. CONCLUSIONS: VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10548429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105484292023-10-05 Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis Sawada, Masafumi Shiraishi, Yutaka Toyama, Hirofumi Tanaka, Tomoki Kota, Ryuichi Shigematsu, Naoyuki J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D(90)) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm(3) of other organs at risk (D(2cm(3))) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D(90) of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, p = 0.172). The D(2cm(3)) values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, p = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR. CONCLUSIONS: VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV. Termedia Publishing House 2023-08-30 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10548429/ /pubmed/37799123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842 Text en Copyright © 2023 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sawada, Masafumi
Shiraishi, Yutaka
Toyama, Hirofumi
Tanaka, Tomoki
Kota, Ryuichi
Shigematsu, Naoyuki
Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title_full Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title_short Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
title_sort dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799123
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842
work_keys_str_mv AT sawadamasafumi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis
AT shiraishiyutaka dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis
AT toyamahirofumi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis
AT tanakatomoki dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis
AT kotaryuichi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis
AT shigematsunaoyuki dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis