Cargando…
Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis
PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842 |
_version_ | 1785115268212588544 |
---|---|
author | Sawada, Masafumi Shiraishi, Yutaka Toyama, Hirofumi Tanaka, Tomoki Kota, Ryuichi Shigematsu, Naoyuki |
author_facet | Sawada, Masafumi Shiraishi, Yutaka Toyama, Hirofumi Tanaka, Tomoki Kota, Ryuichi Shigematsu, Naoyuki |
author_sort | Sawada, Masafumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D(90)) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm(3) of other organs at risk (D(2cm(3))) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D(90) of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, p = 0.172). The D(2cm(3)) values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, p = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR. CONCLUSIONS: VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10548429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105484292023-10-05 Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis Sawada, Masafumi Shiraishi, Yutaka Toyama, Hirofumi Tanaka, Tomoki Kota, Ryuichi Shigematsu, Naoyuki J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: Rectal complications in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can highly affect quality of life and correlate with rectal dose. Vaginal gauze packing (VP) and rectal retraction (RR) are widely used for rectal dose reduction in high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We aimed to perform a dosimetric comparison of these two methods for three-dimensional image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 50 patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy, including intra-cavitary brachytherapy, performed with VP and RR. We extracted two fractions for each patient: one fraction with VP and the next fraction with RR, and then compared dose-volume parameters. In total, 50 fractions each were analyzed in VP and RR groups. Dose to 90% (D(90)) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and minimum dose to most exposed 2.0 cm(3) of other organs at risk (D(2cm(3))) for the rectum and bladder were determined from planning computed tomography. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between VP and RR in D(90) of HR-CTV (mean: 7.479 Gy and 7.652 Gy, respectively, p = 0.172). The D(2cm(3)) values for the rectum (mean: 4.234 Gy vs. 4.627 Gy, p = 0.008) and bladder (mean: 5.959 Gy vs. 6.690 Gy, p < 0.001) were significantly lower with VP compared with RR. CONCLUSIONS: VP reduced the dose to the rectum and bladder when compared with RR without impairing the dose to CTV. Termedia Publishing House 2023-08-30 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10548429/ /pubmed/37799123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842 Text en Copyright © 2023 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Sawada, Masafumi Shiraishi, Yutaka Toyama, Hirofumi Tanaka, Tomoki Kota, Ryuichi Shigematsu, Naoyuki Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title | Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title_full | Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title_short | Dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis |
title_sort | dosimetric comparison of rectal dose-reductive techniques in intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799123 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.130842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sawadamasafumi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis AT shiraishiyutaka dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis AT toyamahirofumi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis AT tanakatomoki dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis AT kotaryuichi dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis AT shigematsunaoyuki dosimetriccomparisonofrectaldosereductivetechniquesinintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceraretrospectiveanalysis |