Cargando…

Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening may vary per breast density subgroup. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which women, based on automatically assessed breast density subgroups, have the greatest b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olinder, Jakob, Johnson, Kristin, Åkesson, Anna, Förnvik, Daniel, Zackrisson, Sophia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6
_version_ 1785115311414968320
author Olinder, Jakob
Johnson, Kristin
Åkesson, Anna
Förnvik, Daniel
Zackrisson, Sophia
author_facet Olinder, Jakob
Johnson, Kristin
Åkesson, Anna
Förnvik, Daniel
Zackrisson, Sophia
author_sort Olinder, Jakob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening may vary per breast density subgroup. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which women, based on automatically assessed breast density subgroups, have the greatest benefit of DBT compared with DM in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective European, Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (n = 14,848, Jan. 27, 2010–Feb. 13, 2015) compared one-view DBT and two-view DM, with consensus meeting before recall. Breast density was assessed in this secondary analysis with the automatic software Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment. DBT and DM’s diagnostic accuracies were compared by breast density quintiles of breast percent density (PD) and absolute dense area (DA) with confidence intervals (CI) and McNemar’s test. The association between breast density and cancer detection was analyzed with logistic regression, adjusted for ages < 55 and ≥ 55 years and previous screening participation. RESULTS: In total, 14,730 women (median age: 58 years; inter-quartile range = 16) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity was higher and specificity lower for DBT compared with DM for all density subgroups. The highest breast PD quintile showed the largest difference in sensitivity and specificity at 81.1% (95% CI 65.8–90.5) versus 43.2% (95% CI 28.7–59.1), p < .001 and 95.5% (95% CI 94.7–96.2) versus 97.2% (95% CI 96.6–97.8), p < 0.001, respectively. Breast PD quintile was also positively associated with cancer detected via DBT at odds ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.09–1.42, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women with the highest breast density had the greatest benefit from digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography with increased sensitivity at the cost of slightly lower specificity. These results may influence digital breast tomosynthesis’s use in an individualized screening program stratified by, for instance, breast density. Trial registration. Trial registration at https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01091545, registered March 24, 2010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10548633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105486332023-10-05 Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial Olinder, Jakob Johnson, Kristin Åkesson, Anna Förnvik, Daniel Zackrisson, Sophia Breast Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening may vary per breast density subgroup. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which women, based on automatically assessed breast density subgroups, have the greatest benefit of DBT compared with DM in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective European, Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (n = 14,848, Jan. 27, 2010–Feb. 13, 2015) compared one-view DBT and two-view DM, with consensus meeting before recall. Breast density was assessed in this secondary analysis with the automatic software Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment. DBT and DM’s diagnostic accuracies were compared by breast density quintiles of breast percent density (PD) and absolute dense area (DA) with confidence intervals (CI) and McNemar’s test. The association between breast density and cancer detection was analyzed with logistic regression, adjusted for ages < 55 and ≥ 55 years and previous screening participation. RESULTS: In total, 14,730 women (median age: 58 years; inter-quartile range = 16) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity was higher and specificity lower for DBT compared with DM for all density subgroups. The highest breast PD quintile showed the largest difference in sensitivity and specificity at 81.1% (95% CI 65.8–90.5) versus 43.2% (95% CI 28.7–59.1), p < .001 and 95.5% (95% CI 94.7–96.2) versus 97.2% (95% CI 96.6–97.8), p < 0.001, respectively. Breast PD quintile was also positively associated with cancer detected via DBT at odds ratio 1.24 (95% CI 1.09–1.42, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women with the highest breast density had the greatest benefit from digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography with increased sensitivity at the cost of slightly lower specificity. These results may influence digital breast tomosynthesis’s use in an individualized screening program stratified by, for instance, breast density. Trial registration. Trial registration at https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01091545, registered March 24, 2010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6. BioMed Central 2023-10-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10548633/ /pubmed/37794480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Olinder, Jakob
Johnson, Kristin
Åkesson, Anna
Förnvik, Daniel
Zackrisson, Sophia
Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title_full Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title_fullStr Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title_short Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
title_sort impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a european screening trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01712-6
work_keys_str_mv AT olinderjakob impactofbreastdensityondiagnosticaccuracyindigitalbreasttomosynthesisversusdigitalmammographyresultsfromaeuropeanscreeningtrial
AT johnsonkristin impactofbreastdensityondiagnosticaccuracyindigitalbreasttomosynthesisversusdigitalmammographyresultsfromaeuropeanscreeningtrial
AT akessonanna impactofbreastdensityondiagnosticaccuracyindigitalbreasttomosynthesisversusdigitalmammographyresultsfromaeuropeanscreeningtrial
AT fornvikdaniel impactofbreastdensityondiagnosticaccuracyindigitalbreasttomosynthesisversusdigitalmammographyresultsfromaeuropeanscreeningtrial
AT zackrissonsophia impactofbreastdensityondiagnosticaccuracyindigitalbreasttomosynthesisversusdigitalmammographyresultsfromaeuropeanscreeningtrial