Cargando…
Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning
BACKGROUND: The audience response systems are being implemented to support active learning in nursing degree programs. The benefits of audience response systems have been studied in lecture-based classes and seminars, but their advantages or inconveniences when included in the debriefing phase of a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z |
_version_ | 1785115321249562624 |
---|---|
author | Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso Suárez-Cortés, María Leal-Costa, César Ruzafa-Martínez, María Díaz-Agea, José Luis Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesús Jiménez-Ruiz, Ismael |
author_facet | Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso Suárez-Cortés, María Leal-Costa, César Ruzafa-Martínez, María Díaz-Agea, José Luis Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesús Jiménez-Ruiz, Ismael |
author_sort | Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The audience response systems are being implemented to support active learning in nursing degree programs. The benefits of audience response systems have been studied in lecture-based classes and seminars, but their advantages or inconveniences when included in the debriefing phase of a high-fidelity clinical simulation have not been explored. The study aim was to discover student´s experience about using of interactive questions during debriefing, and the self-perceived effects on attention, participation and motivation. METHODS: A Mixed-methods study was used exploratory sequential design in a university. The participants were 4th-year students enrolled in the Nursing Degree in a university in Southern Spain. (1) Qualitative phase: a phenomenological approach was utilized, and focus groups were used for data-collection. (2) Quantitative phase: cross-sectional descriptive study using a questionnaire designed “ad hoc”, on the experiences on the use of interactive questions in the debriefing phase and the Debriefing Experience Scale. RESULTS: (1) Qualitative phase: the students highlighted the facilitating role of the interactive questions during the reflection part of the debriefing, and mentioned that the interactive questions helped with stimulating attention, participation, and motivation during the analytical part of the debriefing; (2) Quantitative phase: it was observed that the best evaluated dimension was “Motivation”, with a mean of 4.7 (SD = 0.480), followed by the dimension “Participation”, with a mean of 4.66 (SD = 0.461), and lastly, the dimension “Attention”, with a mean of 4.64 (SD = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The use of interactive questions contributed the attention, participation, and motivation of the students during the debriefing, contributing towards a highly satisfactory experience of high-fidelity clinical simulation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10548674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105486742023-10-05 Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso Suárez-Cortés, María Leal-Costa, César Ruzafa-Martínez, María Díaz-Agea, José Luis Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesús Jiménez-Ruiz, Ismael BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: The audience response systems are being implemented to support active learning in nursing degree programs. The benefits of audience response systems have been studied in lecture-based classes and seminars, but their advantages or inconveniences when included in the debriefing phase of a high-fidelity clinical simulation have not been explored. The study aim was to discover student´s experience about using of interactive questions during debriefing, and the self-perceived effects on attention, participation and motivation. METHODS: A Mixed-methods study was used exploratory sequential design in a university. The participants were 4th-year students enrolled in the Nursing Degree in a university in Southern Spain. (1) Qualitative phase: a phenomenological approach was utilized, and focus groups were used for data-collection. (2) Quantitative phase: cross-sectional descriptive study using a questionnaire designed “ad hoc”, on the experiences on the use of interactive questions in the debriefing phase and the Debriefing Experience Scale. RESULTS: (1) Qualitative phase: the students highlighted the facilitating role of the interactive questions during the reflection part of the debriefing, and mentioned that the interactive questions helped with stimulating attention, participation, and motivation during the analytical part of the debriefing; (2) Quantitative phase: it was observed that the best evaluated dimension was “Motivation”, with a mean of 4.7 (SD = 0.480), followed by the dimension “Participation”, with a mean of 4.66 (SD = 0.461), and lastly, the dimension “Attention”, with a mean of 4.64 (SD = 0.418). CONCLUSIONS: The use of interactive questions contributed the attention, participation, and motivation of the students during the debriefing, contributing towards a highly satisfactory experience of high-fidelity clinical simulation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z. BioMed Central 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10548674/ /pubmed/37789299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Molina-Rodríguez, Alonso Suárez-Cortés, María Leal-Costa, César Ruzafa-Martínez, María Díaz-Agea, José Luis Ramos-Morcillo, Antonio Jesús Jiménez-Ruiz, Ismael Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title | Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title_full | Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title_fullStr | Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title_short | Including audience response systems in debriefing. A mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
title_sort | including audience response systems in debriefing. a mixed study during nursing simulation-based learning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01499-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinarodriguezalonso includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT suarezcortesmaria includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT lealcostacesar includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT ruzafamartinezmaria includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT diazageajoseluis includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT ramosmorcilloantoniojesus includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning AT jimenezruizismael includingaudienceresponsesystemsindebriefingamixedstudyduringnursingsimulationbasedlearning |