Cargando…

Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria

BACKGROUND: In nature, beneficial bacteria triggering induced systemic resistance (ISR) may protect plants from potential diseases, reducing yield losses caused by diverse pathogens. However, little is known about how the host plant initially responds to different beneficial bacteria. To reveal the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Yongming, Han, Min, Grimm, Maja, Schierstaedt, Jasper, Imani, Jafargholi, Cardinale, Massimiliano, Le Jean, Marie, Nesme, Joseph, Sørensen, Søren J., Schikora, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04484-5
_version_ 1785115323128610816
author Duan, Yongming
Han, Min
Grimm, Maja
Schierstaedt, Jasper
Imani, Jafargholi
Cardinale, Massimiliano
Le Jean, Marie
Nesme, Joseph
Sørensen, Søren J.
Schikora, Adam
author_facet Duan, Yongming
Han, Min
Grimm, Maja
Schierstaedt, Jasper
Imani, Jafargholi
Cardinale, Massimiliano
Le Jean, Marie
Nesme, Joseph
Sørensen, Søren J.
Schikora, Adam
author_sort Duan, Yongming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In nature, beneficial bacteria triggering induced systemic resistance (ISR) may protect plants from potential diseases, reducing yield losses caused by diverse pathogens. However, little is known about how the host plant initially responds to different beneficial bacteria. To reveal the impact of different bacteria on barley (Hordeum vulgare), bacterial colonization patterns, gene expression, and composition of seed endophytes were explored. RESULTS: This study used the soil-borne Ensifer meliloti, as well as Pantoea sp. and Pseudomonas sp. isolated from barley seeds, individually. The results demonstrated that those bacteria persisted in the rhizosphere but with different colonization patterns. Although root-leaf translocation was not observed, all three bacteria induced systemic resistance (ISR) against foliar fungal pathogens. Transcriptome analysis revealed that ion- and stress-related genes were regulated in plants that first encountered bacteria. Iron homeostasis and heat stress responses were involved in the response to E. meliloti and Pantoea sp., even if the iron content was not altered. Heat shock protein-encoding genes responded to inoculation with Pantoea sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Furthermore, bacterial inoculation affected the composition of seed endophytes. Investigation of the following generation indicated that the enhanced resistance was not heritable. CONCLUSIONS: Here, using barley as a model, we highlighted different responses to three different beneficial bacteria as well as the influence of soil-borne Ensifer meliloti on the seed microbiome. In total, these results can help to understand the interaction between ISR-triggering bacteria and a crop plant, which is essential for the application of biological agents in sustainable agriculture. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-023-04484-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10548682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105486822023-10-05 Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria Duan, Yongming Han, Min Grimm, Maja Schierstaedt, Jasper Imani, Jafargholi Cardinale, Massimiliano Le Jean, Marie Nesme, Joseph Sørensen, Søren J. Schikora, Adam BMC Plant Biol Research BACKGROUND: In nature, beneficial bacteria triggering induced systemic resistance (ISR) may protect plants from potential diseases, reducing yield losses caused by diverse pathogens. However, little is known about how the host plant initially responds to different beneficial bacteria. To reveal the impact of different bacteria on barley (Hordeum vulgare), bacterial colonization patterns, gene expression, and composition of seed endophytes were explored. RESULTS: This study used the soil-borne Ensifer meliloti, as well as Pantoea sp. and Pseudomonas sp. isolated from barley seeds, individually. The results demonstrated that those bacteria persisted in the rhizosphere but with different colonization patterns. Although root-leaf translocation was not observed, all three bacteria induced systemic resistance (ISR) against foliar fungal pathogens. Transcriptome analysis revealed that ion- and stress-related genes were regulated in plants that first encountered bacteria. Iron homeostasis and heat stress responses were involved in the response to E. meliloti and Pantoea sp., even if the iron content was not altered. Heat shock protein-encoding genes responded to inoculation with Pantoea sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Furthermore, bacterial inoculation affected the composition of seed endophytes. Investigation of the following generation indicated that the enhanced resistance was not heritable. CONCLUSIONS: Here, using barley as a model, we highlighted different responses to three different beneficial bacteria as well as the influence of soil-borne Ensifer meliloti on the seed microbiome. In total, these results can help to understand the interaction between ISR-triggering bacteria and a crop plant, which is essential for the application of biological agents in sustainable agriculture. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-023-04484-5. BioMed Central 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10548682/ /pubmed/37789272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04484-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Duan, Yongming
Han, Min
Grimm, Maja
Schierstaedt, Jasper
Imani, Jafargholi
Cardinale, Massimiliano
Le Jean, Marie
Nesme, Joseph
Sørensen, Søren J.
Schikora, Adam
Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title_full Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title_fullStr Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title_short Hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
title_sort hordeum vulgare differentiates its response to beneficial bacteria
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37789272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04484-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duanyongming hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT hanmin hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT grimmmaja hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT schierstaedtjasper hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT imanijafargholi hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT cardinalemassimiliano hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT lejeanmarie hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT nesmejoseph hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT sørensensørenj hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria
AT schikoraadam hordeumvulgaredifferentiatesitsresponsetobeneficialbacteria