Cargando…
Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180 |
_version_ | 1785115357217816576 |
---|---|
author | Long, Jianfei Gong, Jingru Zhu, Han Liu, Xiaolin Li, Ling Chen, Bicui Ren, Hongyan Liu, Chao Lu, Huiping Zhang, Jiming Wang, Bin |
author_facet | Long, Jianfei Gong, Jingru Zhu, Han Liu, Xiaolin Li, Ling Chen, Bicui Ren, Hongyan Liu, Chao Lu, Huiping Zhang, Jiming Wang, Bin |
author_sort | Long, Jianfei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on gut microbiota. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with CHB not taking nucleoside antivirals (No-NAs group, n = 95) and those taking TAF (TAF group, n = 60). We divided CHB patients into two groups according to the HBeAg status of the subjects on the day of data collection. Phase 1 are HBeAg-negative patients and phase 2 are HBeAg-positive patients. We investigated the improvement of clinical symptoms by TAF, as well as differences in gut microbiota between different groups by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. RESULTS: Gut microbiota demonstrated significant differences between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Both the No-NAs and TAF Phase 2 subgroups demonstrated significantly increased microbiota richness and diversity, showing greater heterogeneity. Additionally, the Phase 2 subgroup exhibited a low abundance of pathways associated with glucose metabolism and amino acid metabolism. The TAF group demonstrated a significantly decreased HBV load, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase and a significant increase in prealbumin compared with the No-NAs group. No significant difference was found in uric acid, creatinine, blood calcium, inorganic phosphorus, eGFR, and β2-microglobulin concentrations between the two groups. Additionally, the urea level in the TAF group was significantly lower than that in the No-NAs group, but with no significant effect on other indicators such as eGFR and β2-microglobulin. CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant differences in gut microbiota composition and function between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10548823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105488232023-10-05 Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora Long, Jianfei Gong, Jingru Zhu, Han Liu, Xiaolin Li, Ling Chen, Bicui Ren, Hongyan Liu, Chao Lu, Huiping Zhang, Jiming Wang, Bin Front Microbiol Microbiology BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on gut microbiota. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with CHB not taking nucleoside antivirals (No-NAs group, n = 95) and those taking TAF (TAF group, n = 60). We divided CHB patients into two groups according to the HBeAg status of the subjects on the day of data collection. Phase 1 are HBeAg-negative patients and phase 2 are HBeAg-positive patients. We investigated the improvement of clinical symptoms by TAF, as well as differences in gut microbiota between different groups by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. RESULTS: Gut microbiota demonstrated significant differences between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Both the No-NAs and TAF Phase 2 subgroups demonstrated significantly increased microbiota richness and diversity, showing greater heterogeneity. Additionally, the Phase 2 subgroup exhibited a low abundance of pathways associated with glucose metabolism and amino acid metabolism. The TAF group demonstrated a significantly decreased HBV load, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase and a significant increase in prealbumin compared with the No-NAs group. No significant difference was found in uric acid, creatinine, blood calcium, inorganic phosphorus, eGFR, and β2-microglobulin concentrations between the two groups. Additionally, the urea level in the TAF group was significantly lower than that in the No-NAs group, but with no significant effect on other indicators such as eGFR and β2-microglobulin. CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant differences in gut microbiota composition and function between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10548823/ /pubmed/37799607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180 Text en Copyright © 2023 Long, Gong, Zhu, Liu, Li, Chen, Ren, Liu, Lu, Zhang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Long, Jianfei Gong, Jingru Zhu, Han Liu, Xiaolin Li, Ling Chen, Bicui Ren, Hongyan Liu, Chao Lu, Huiping Zhang, Jiming Wang, Bin Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title | Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title_full | Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title_fullStr | Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title_short | Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
title_sort | difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive hbeag in chronic hepatitis b and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longjianfei differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT gongjingru differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT zhuhan differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT liuxiaolin differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT liling differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT chenbicui differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT renhongyan differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT liuchao differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT luhuiping differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT zhangjiming differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora AT wangbin differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora |