Cargando…

Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora

BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Jianfei, Gong, Jingru, Zhu, Han, Liu, Xiaolin, Li, Ling, Chen, Bicui, Ren, Hongyan, Liu, Chao, Lu, Huiping, Zhang, Jiming, Wang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180
_version_ 1785115357217816576
author Long, Jianfei
Gong, Jingru
Zhu, Han
Liu, Xiaolin
Li, Ling
Chen, Bicui
Ren, Hongyan
Liu, Chao
Lu, Huiping
Zhang, Jiming
Wang, Bin
author_facet Long, Jianfei
Gong, Jingru
Zhu, Han
Liu, Xiaolin
Li, Ling
Chen, Bicui
Ren, Hongyan
Liu, Chao
Lu, Huiping
Zhang, Jiming
Wang, Bin
author_sort Long, Jianfei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on gut microbiota. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with CHB not taking nucleoside antivirals (No-NAs group, n = 95) and those taking TAF (TAF group, n = 60). We divided CHB patients into two groups according to the HBeAg status of the subjects on the day of data collection. Phase 1 are HBeAg-negative patients and phase 2 are HBeAg-positive patients. We investigated the improvement of clinical symptoms by TAF, as well as differences in gut microbiota between different groups by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. RESULTS: Gut microbiota demonstrated significant differences between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Both the No-NAs and TAF Phase 2 subgroups demonstrated significantly increased microbiota richness and diversity, showing greater heterogeneity. Additionally, the Phase 2 subgroup exhibited a low abundance of pathways associated with glucose metabolism and amino acid metabolism. The TAF group demonstrated a significantly decreased HBV load, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase and a significant increase in prealbumin compared with the No-NAs group. No significant difference was found in uric acid, creatinine, blood calcium, inorganic phosphorus, eGFR, and β2-microglobulin concentrations between the two groups. Additionally, the urea level in the TAF group was significantly lower than that in the No-NAs group, but with no significant effect on other indicators such as eGFR and β2-microglobulin. CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant differences in gut microbiota composition and function between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10548823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105488232023-10-05 Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora Long, Jianfei Gong, Jingru Zhu, Han Liu, Xiaolin Li, Ling Chen, Bicui Ren, Hongyan Liu, Chao Lu, Huiping Zhang, Jiming Wang, Bin Front Microbiol Microbiology BACKGROUND: Severe liver diseases, such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer, are mainly caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study investigated the differences between gut microbiota in HBeAg-positive and negative groups of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and investigated the effect of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on gut microbiota. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with CHB not taking nucleoside antivirals (No-NAs group, n = 95) and those taking TAF (TAF group, n = 60). We divided CHB patients into two groups according to the HBeAg status of the subjects on the day of data collection. Phase 1 are HBeAg-negative patients and phase 2 are HBeAg-positive patients. We investigated the improvement of clinical symptoms by TAF, as well as differences in gut microbiota between different groups by 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. RESULTS: Gut microbiota demonstrated significant differences between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Both the No-NAs and TAF Phase 2 subgroups demonstrated significantly increased microbiota richness and diversity, showing greater heterogeneity. Additionally, the Phase 2 subgroup exhibited a low abundance of pathways associated with glucose metabolism and amino acid metabolism. The TAF group demonstrated a significantly decreased HBV load, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase and a significant increase in prealbumin compared with the No-NAs group. No significant difference was found in uric acid, creatinine, blood calcium, inorganic phosphorus, eGFR, and β2-microglobulin concentrations between the two groups. Additionally, the urea level in the TAF group was significantly lower than that in the No-NAs group, but with no significant effect on other indicators such as eGFR and β2-microglobulin. CONCLUSION: This study revealed significant differences in gut microbiota composition and function between patients with HBeAg-positive and -negative CHB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10548823/ /pubmed/37799607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180 Text en Copyright © 2023 Long, Gong, Zhu, Liu, Li, Chen, Ren, Liu, Lu, Zhang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Long, Jianfei
Gong, Jingru
Zhu, Han
Liu, Xiaolin
Li, Ling
Chen, Bicui
Ren, Hongyan
Liu, Chao
Lu, Huiping
Zhang, Jiming
Wang, Bin
Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title_full Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title_fullStr Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title_full_unstemmed Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title_short Difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive HBeAg in chronic hepatitis B and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
title_sort difference of gut microbiota between patients with negative and positive hbeag in chronic hepatitis b and the effect of tenofovir alafenamide on intestinal flora
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232180
work_keys_str_mv AT longjianfei differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT gongjingru differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT zhuhan differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT liuxiaolin differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT liling differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT chenbicui differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT renhongyan differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT liuchao differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT luhuiping differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT zhangjiming differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora
AT wangbin differenceofgutmicrobiotabetweenpatientswithnegativeandpositivehbeaginchronichepatitisbandtheeffectoftenofoviralafenamideonintestinalflora