Cargando…

Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Hiroyuki, Sato, Toshiaki, Shimeno, Kenji, Mito, Shinji, Nishida, Taku, Soejima, Kyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22–64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32–28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2‐year follow‐up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing.