Cargando…
Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906 |
_version_ | 1785115409481990144 |
---|---|
author | Kato, Hiroyuki Sato, Toshiaki Shimeno, Kenji Mito, Shinji Nishida, Taku Soejima, Kyoko |
author_facet | Kato, Hiroyuki Sato, Toshiaki Shimeno, Kenji Mito, Shinji Nishida, Taku Soejima, Kyoko |
author_sort | Kato, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22–64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32–28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2‐year follow‐up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10549844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105498442023-10-05 Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia Kato, Hiroyuki Sato, Toshiaki Shimeno, Kenji Mito, Shinji Nishida, Taku Soejima, Kyoko J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22–64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32–28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2‐year follow‐up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10549844/ /pubmed/37799795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kato, Hiroyuki Sato, Toshiaki Shimeno, Kenji Mito, Shinji Nishida, Taku Soejima, Kyoko Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title | Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title_full | Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title_fullStr | Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title_short | Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
title_sort | predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katohiroyuki predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia AT satotoshiaki predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia AT shimenokenji predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia AT mitoshinji predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia AT nishidataku predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia AT soejimakyoko predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia |