Cargando…

Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Hiroyuki, Sato, Toshiaki, Shimeno, Kenji, Mito, Shinji, Nishida, Taku, Soejima, Kyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906
_version_ 1785115409481990144
author Kato, Hiroyuki
Sato, Toshiaki
Shimeno, Kenji
Mito, Shinji
Nishida, Taku
Soejima, Kyoko
author_facet Kato, Hiroyuki
Sato, Toshiaki
Shimeno, Kenji
Mito, Shinji
Nishida, Taku
Soejima, Kyoko
author_sort Kato, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22–64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32–28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2‐year follow‐up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10549844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105498442023-10-05 Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia Kato, Hiroyuki Sato, Toshiaki Shimeno, Kenji Mito, Shinji Nishida, Taku Soejima, Kyoko J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel conduction system pacing technique. In this multicenter study, we aimed to evaluate the procedural success, safety, and preoperative predictors of procedural failure of LBBAP. METHODS: LBBAP was attempted in 285 patients with pacemaker indications for bradyarrhythmia, which were mainly atrioventricular block (AVB) (68.1%) and sick sinus syndrome (26.7%). Procedural success and electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: LBBAP was successful in 247 (86.7%) patients. Left bundle branch (LBB) capture was confirmed in 54.7% of the population. The primary reasons for procedural failure were the inability of the pacemaker lead to penetrate deep into the septum (76.3%) and failure to achieve shortening of stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time in lead V6 (18.4%). Thickened interventricular septum (odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.35), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.22–64.06), and intraventricular conduction delay (OR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.32–28.75) were preoperative predictors of procedural failure. The capture threshold and ventricular amplitude remained stable, and no major complications occurred throughout the 2‐year follow‐up. In patients with ventricular pacing burden >40%, the LV ejection fraction remained high regardless of LBB capture. CONCLUSIONS: Successful LBBAP was affected by abnormal cardiac anatomy and intraventricular conduction. LBBAP is feasible and safe as a primary strategy for patients with AVB, depending on ventricular pacing. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10549844/ /pubmed/37799795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kato, Hiroyuki
Sato, Toshiaki
Shimeno, Kenji
Mito, Shinji
Nishida, Taku
Soejima, Kyoko
Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title_full Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title_fullStr Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title_short Predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
title_sort predictors of implantation failure in left bundle branch area pacing using a lumenless lead in patients with bradycardia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12906
work_keys_str_mv AT katohiroyuki predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia
AT satotoshiaki predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia
AT shimenokenji predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia
AT mitoshinji predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia
AT nishidataku predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia
AT soejimakyoko predictorsofimplantationfailureinleftbundlebranchareapacingusingalumenlessleadinpatientswithbradycardia