Cargando…

Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND: Acne is an inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that occurs primarily in adolescents. There is no current ideal treatment for acne vulgaris, as many mainstay prescription treatment modalities can compromise the skin microbiome or have deleterious health effects. Further researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqam, Mona L., Jones, Brian C., Hitchcock, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.264
_version_ 1785115414431268864
author Alqam, Mona L.
Jones, Brian C.
Hitchcock, Thomas M.
author_facet Alqam, Mona L.
Jones, Brian C.
Hitchcock, Thomas M.
author_sort Alqam, Mona L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acne is an inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that occurs primarily in adolescents. There is no current ideal treatment for acne vulgaris, as many mainstay prescription treatment modalities can compromise the skin microbiome or have deleterious health effects. Further research is needed to investigate novel treatment modalities that account for the importance of the skin microbiome. Other developing treatment modalities for acne are still taking a similar mode of action as current treatments by trying to eliminate Cutibacterium acnes despite growing evidence that some C. acnes strains may be symbiotic in nature. The perception that microneedling will exacerbate the disease state and trigger more acneic lesions via the spread of acne‐associated microbes has hindered research investigating whether microneedling is a safe and effective treatment. This pilot clinical study challenges such perceptions by clinical assessment to determine if microneedling may produce beneficial treatment outcomes without disrupting critical skin structure or skin microbiome. OBJECTIVES: Test the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment modality for acne vulgaris. METHODS: Subjects were split into two groups, one group received three treatments 4 weeks apart, and the second group received four treatments 2 weeks apart. Subjects received an acne assessment by an expert clinical grader at all clinical visits. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in both non‐inflammatory and inflammatory lesions at the 2‐month follow‐up compared to the baseline for Group 1. Group 1 and Group 2 saw a decline of 48.20% and 54.00% in non‐inflammatory lesions and 57.97% and 36.67% in inflammatory lesions, respectively, at their last visit compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: This study expands the utility of microneedling into a potential therapeutic modality for acne vulgaris. The data generated during the duration of this clinical study demonstrates that there is no scientific reason for microneedling to be contraindicated for acne. In this pilot, microneedling did not cause post‐treatment complications and was seen to reduce acne lesions effectively. Thus, microneedling may have the potential to be a well‐tolerated option for those suffering from acne, being a treatment that neither damages the sebaceous glands nor disrupts the skin microbiome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10549865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105498652023-10-05 Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris Alqam, Mona L. Jones, Brian C. Hitchcock, Thomas M. Skin Health Dis Original Articles BACKGROUND: Acne is an inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit that occurs primarily in adolescents. There is no current ideal treatment for acne vulgaris, as many mainstay prescription treatment modalities can compromise the skin microbiome or have deleterious health effects. Further research is needed to investigate novel treatment modalities that account for the importance of the skin microbiome. Other developing treatment modalities for acne are still taking a similar mode of action as current treatments by trying to eliminate Cutibacterium acnes despite growing evidence that some C. acnes strains may be symbiotic in nature. The perception that microneedling will exacerbate the disease state and trigger more acneic lesions via the spread of acne‐associated microbes has hindered research investigating whether microneedling is a safe and effective treatment. This pilot clinical study challenges such perceptions by clinical assessment to determine if microneedling may produce beneficial treatment outcomes without disrupting critical skin structure or skin microbiome. OBJECTIVES: Test the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment modality for acne vulgaris. METHODS: Subjects were split into two groups, one group received three treatments 4 weeks apart, and the second group received four treatments 2 weeks apart. Subjects received an acne assessment by an expert clinical grader at all clinical visits. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in both non‐inflammatory and inflammatory lesions at the 2‐month follow‐up compared to the baseline for Group 1. Group 1 and Group 2 saw a decline of 48.20% and 54.00% in non‐inflammatory lesions and 57.97% and 36.67% in inflammatory lesions, respectively, at their last visit compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: This study expands the utility of microneedling into a potential therapeutic modality for acne vulgaris. The data generated during the duration of this clinical study demonstrates that there is no scientific reason for microneedling to be contraindicated for acne. In this pilot, microneedling did not cause post‐treatment complications and was seen to reduce acne lesions effectively. Thus, microneedling may have the potential to be a well‐tolerated option for those suffering from acne, being a treatment that neither damages the sebaceous glands nor disrupts the skin microbiome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10549865/ /pubmed/37799356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.264 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Alqam, Mona L.
Jones, Brian C.
Hitchcock, Thomas M.
Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title_full Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title_fullStr Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title_full_unstemmed Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title_short Study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
title_sort study to determine the safety and efficacy of microneedling as an effective treatment for acne vulgaris
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10549865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ski2.264
work_keys_str_mv AT alqammonal studytodeterminethesafetyandefficacyofmicroneedlingasaneffectivetreatmentforacnevulgaris
AT jonesbrianc studytodeterminethesafetyandefficacyofmicroneedlingasaneffectivetreatmentforacnevulgaris
AT hitchcockthomasm studytodeterminethesafetyandefficacyofmicroneedlingasaneffectivetreatmentforacnevulgaris