Cargando…
Evidence of immune imprinting or the effect of selection bias?
People with booster vaccinations appear more prone to reinfection than those with primary series vaccination only; however, selection bias in the study design complicates interpretation.
Autor principal: | Hansen, Christian H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk5668 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies in Cancer Care: Addressing Disparities, Bias, and Data Diversity
por: Dankwa-Mullan, Irene, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What makes us human? A biased view from the perspective of comparative embryology and mouse genetics
por: Goffinet, André M
Publicado: (2006) -
Alcohol and HIV Effects on the Immune System
por: Bagby, Gregory J., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Empirical evidence of effects of stringency amid Covid-19 pandemic spread
por: Minu, R. I., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Picture fuzzy set-based decision-making approach using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and grey relation analysis and its application in COVID-19 medicine selection
por: Si, Amalendu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)