Cargando…

Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation

Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowen, James M, Ouimet, Mathieu, Lawarée, Justin, Bielecki, Joanna, Rhéaume, Ashley, Greenberg, Caylee, Rac, Valeria E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034
_version_ 1785115494881165312
author Bowen, James M
Ouimet, Mathieu
Lawarée, Justin
Bielecki, Joanna
Rhéaume, Ashley
Greenberg, Caylee
Rac, Valeria E
author_facet Bowen, James M
Ouimet, Mathieu
Lawarée, Justin
Bielecki, Joanna
Rhéaume, Ashley
Greenberg, Caylee
Rac, Valeria E
author_sort Bowen, James M
collection PubMed
description Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10550251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105502512023-10-05 Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation Bowen, James M Ouimet, Mathieu Lawarée, Justin Bielecki, Joanna Rhéaume, Ashley Greenberg, Caylee Rac, Valeria E Res Eval Article Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors. Oxford University Press 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10550251/ /pubmed/37799115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Bowen, James M
Ouimet, Mathieu
Lawarée, Justin
Bielecki, Joanna
Rhéaume, Ashley
Greenberg, Caylee
Rac, Valeria E
Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title_full Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title_fullStr Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title_short Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
title_sort describing the state of a research network: a mixed methods approach to network evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenjamesm describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT ouimetmathieu describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT lawareejustin describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT bieleckijoanna describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT rheaumeashley describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT greenbergcaylee describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation
AT racvaleriae describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation