Cargando…
Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation
Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034 |
_version_ | 1785115494881165312 |
---|---|
author | Bowen, James M Ouimet, Mathieu Lawarée, Justin Bielecki, Joanna Rhéaume, Ashley Greenberg, Caylee Rac, Valeria E |
author_facet | Bowen, James M Ouimet, Mathieu Lawarée, Justin Bielecki, Joanna Rhéaume, Ashley Greenberg, Caylee Rac, Valeria E |
author_sort | Bowen, James M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10550251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105502512023-10-05 Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation Bowen, James M Ouimet, Mathieu Lawarée, Justin Bielecki, Joanna Rhéaume, Ashley Greenberg, Caylee Rac, Valeria E Res Eval Article Diabetes Action Canada Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Network in Chronic Disease was formed in 2016 and is funded primarily through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We propose a novel mixed-methods approach to a network evaluation integrating the State of Network Evaluation framework and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS) preferred framework and indicators. We measure key network themes of connectivity, health and results, and impact and return on investment associated with health research networks. Our methods consist of a longitudinal cross-sectional network survey of members and social network analysis to examine Network Connectivity and assess the frequency of interactions, the topics discussed during them, and how networking effectively facilitates interactions and collaboration among members. Network Health will be evaluated through semistructured interviews, a membership survey inquiring about satisfaction and experience with the Network, and a review of documentary sources related to funding and infrastructure to evaluate Network Sustainability. Finally, we will examine Network Results and Impact using the CAHS preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research across the five domains of the CAHS framework, which include: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health impact, and economic and social impact. Indicators will be assessed with various methods, including bibliometric analyses, review of relevant documentary sources (annual reports), member activities informing health and research policy, and Patient Partner involvement. The Network Evaluation will provide members and stakeholders with information for planning, improvements, and funding future Network endeavors. Oxford University Press 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10550251/ /pubmed/37799115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Bowen, James M Ouimet, Mathieu Lawarée, Justin Bielecki, Joanna Rhéaume, Ashley Greenberg, Caylee Rac, Valeria E Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title | Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title_full | Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title_fullStr | Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title_short | Describing the state of a research network: A mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
title_sort | describing the state of a research network: a mixed methods approach to network evaluation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowenjamesm describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT ouimetmathieu describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT lawareejustin describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT bieleckijoanna describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT rheaumeashley describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT greenbergcaylee describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation AT racvaleriae describingthestateofaresearchnetworkamixedmethodsapproachtonetworkevaluation |