Cargando…

Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower

A large portion of the country of Turkey is located in a very high seismic region known as a first-degree earthquake zone where earthquakes occur frequently. Earthquakes result in damage to infrastructure including base station towers and subsequently failure of mobile communication networks. The lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilginer, Omer, Karaman, Himmet, van de Lindt, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20582
_version_ 1785115575013343232
author Bilginer, Omer
Karaman, Himmet
van de Lindt, John W.
author_facet Bilginer, Omer
Karaman, Himmet
van de Lindt, John W.
author_sort Bilginer, Omer
collection PubMed
description A large portion of the country of Turkey is located in a very high seismic region known as a first-degree earthquake zone where earthquakes occur frequently. Earthquakes result in damage to infrastructure including base station towers and subsequently failure of mobile communication networks. The loss of functionality of mobile communication networks following an earthquake has a direct impact on emergency response and both short and long-term recovery phases. Understanding both these phases requires systematic modeling of infrastructure components, which rely on fragility curves representing the probabilistic relationship between seismic intensity and damage. This study focuses on the development of damage fragility curves (fragilities) for an archetypical mobile cellular tower, namely a 55 m tall steel lattice tower (SLT) used in base station towers in Turkey. Nonlinear time history analysis was performed using a robust suite of far field ground motion records to model the performance of the archetype tower and develop damage fragilities for five specific damage states which were defined in terms of likely performance: damage state 0 (no damage), damage state 1 (uninterrupted communication), damage state 2 (communication interruption), damage state 3 (communication failure), damage state 4 (structural failure). While fragility curve has been developed for lattice towers of different types and sizes in the literature, there is no specific study for 55 m SLT and the novelty of this study is that the resulting SLT archetype fragilities can serve as a benchmark dataset for use in community-level risk and resilience analyses to improve response and recovery planning following earthquakes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10550588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105505882023-10-06 Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower Bilginer, Omer Karaman, Himmet van de Lindt, John W. Heliyon Research Article A large portion of the country of Turkey is located in a very high seismic region known as a first-degree earthquake zone where earthquakes occur frequently. Earthquakes result in damage to infrastructure including base station towers and subsequently failure of mobile communication networks. The loss of functionality of mobile communication networks following an earthquake has a direct impact on emergency response and both short and long-term recovery phases. Understanding both these phases requires systematic modeling of infrastructure components, which rely on fragility curves representing the probabilistic relationship between seismic intensity and damage. This study focuses on the development of damage fragility curves (fragilities) for an archetypical mobile cellular tower, namely a 55 m tall steel lattice tower (SLT) used in base station towers in Turkey. Nonlinear time history analysis was performed using a robust suite of far field ground motion records to model the performance of the archetype tower and develop damage fragilities for five specific damage states which were defined in terms of likely performance: damage state 0 (no damage), damage state 1 (uninterrupted communication), damage state 2 (communication interruption), damage state 3 (communication failure), damage state 4 (structural failure). While fragility curve has been developed for lattice towers of different types and sizes in the literature, there is no specific study for 55 m SLT and the novelty of this study is that the resulting SLT archetype fragilities can serve as a benchmark dataset for use in community-level risk and resilience analyses to improve response and recovery planning following earthquakes. Elsevier 2023-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10550588/ /pubmed/37810835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20582 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Bilginer, Omer
Karaman, Himmet
van de Lindt, John W.
Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title_full Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title_fullStr Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title_full_unstemmed Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title_short Development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
title_sort development of seismic fragilities for a base station steel lattice cellular tower
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20582
work_keys_str_mv AT bilgineromer developmentofseismicfragilitiesforabasestationsteellatticecellulartower
AT karamanhimmet developmentofseismicfragilitiesforabasestationsteellatticecellulartower
AT vandelindtjohnw developmentofseismicfragilitiesforabasestationsteellatticecellulartower