Cargando…

Characterization of the skill of the CORDEX-Africa regional climate models to simulate regional climate setting in the East African Transboundary Omo Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia

Regional climate models (RCMs) that produce good outputs in one region or for specific variables may underperform for others. Thereby, assessing the performance of various model simulations and their corresponding mean ensemble is critical in identifying the most suitable models. In this regard, a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathewos, Yonas, Abate, Brook, Dadi, Mulugeta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20379
Descripción
Sumario:Regional climate models (RCMs) that produce good outputs in one region or for specific variables may underperform for others. Thereby, assessing the performance of various model simulations and their corresponding mean ensemble is critical in identifying the most suitable models. In this regard, a study was conducted to evaluate the performance of ten RCMs against observations from multiple ground-based stations in the East African Transboundary Omo Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia, during the baseline period of 1986–2005. The study evaluated the models' ability to replicate various aspects of climatic variables and their corresponding statistical indicators. The results confirmed that RCMs have varying abilities to reproduce climatic conditions across the basin. The ensembles and RACMO22T (EC-EARTH) were better at replicating the average annual precipitation distribution. Meanwhile, the CCLM4-8-17 (MPI) together with the ensembles better captured the measured precipitation annually, despite the discrepancies in the actual magnitudes. All RCMs were able to simulate the seasonal precipitation patterns effectively, with RACMO22T (EC-EARTH), CCLM4-8-17 (CNRM), RCA4 (CNRM), CCLM4-8-17 (MPI), and REMO2009 (MPI) models captured superior, excluding the maximum value. Interannual and seasonal rainfall pattern variations were more significant than variations in air temperature. Additionally, a better correlation was observed between actual and simulated precipitation at multiple separate monitoring places. The RCA4 (MPI) and CCLM4-8-17 (MPI) demonstrated reasonable minimum and maximum temperatures. The RCA4 (MIROC5) model was more effective in reproducing extreme precipitation events. However, all RCMs and their ensembles tended to overestimate the return periods of these events. In general, the research highlights the importance of selecting reliable RCMs that better replicate observed climatic settings and employing the ensemble mean of top-performing models following systematic bias adjustment for a specific application.