Cargando…
A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A li...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6 |
_version_ | 1785115643012448256 |
---|---|
author | Tafazzoli, Ali Reifsnider, Odette S. Bellanca, Leana Ishak, Jack Carrasco, Marc Rakonczai, Pal Stargardter, Matthew Linden, Stephan |
author_facet | Tafazzoli, Ali Reifsnider, Odette S. Bellanca, Leana Ishak, Jack Carrasco, Marc Rakonczai, Pal Stargardter, Matthew Linden, Stephan |
author_sort | Tafazzoli, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients’ progression through health states based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score. The model predicted risk of death, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure (HHF), treatment-related adverse events, and treatment discontinuation each monthly cycle. Clinical inputs and utilities were derived from EMPEROR-Reduced trial data, supplemented by published literature and national costing databases. Costs (2021 pound sterling/euro) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted annually for the UK (3.5%), Spain (3.0%) and France (2.5%). RESULTS: In the UK, Spain and France, empagliflozin plus SoC yielded additional QALYs (0.19, 0.23 and 0.21) at higher cost (£1185, €1770 and €1183 per patient) than SoC alone, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £6152/QALY, €7736/QALY and €5511/QALY, respectively. Reduced HHF incidence provided most cost offsets for empagliflozin plus SoC. Similar results were obtained for a range of subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated empagliflozin plus SoC remained cost-effective vs. SoC at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000/QALY, €20,000/QALY and €30,000/QALY in 79.6%, 75.5% and 97.3% of model runs for the UK, Spain and France, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC leads to health benefits for patients with HFrEF and is a cost-effective treatment option for payers in multiple European countries (UK, Spain, France). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10550866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105508662023-10-06 A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Tafazzoli, Ali Reifsnider, Odette S. Bellanca, Leana Ishak, Jack Carrasco, Marc Rakonczai, Pal Stargardter, Matthew Linden, Stephan Eur J Health Econ Original Paper PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients’ progression through health states based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score. The model predicted risk of death, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure (HHF), treatment-related adverse events, and treatment discontinuation each monthly cycle. Clinical inputs and utilities were derived from EMPEROR-Reduced trial data, supplemented by published literature and national costing databases. Costs (2021 pound sterling/euro) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted annually for the UK (3.5%), Spain (3.0%) and France (2.5%). RESULTS: In the UK, Spain and France, empagliflozin plus SoC yielded additional QALYs (0.19, 0.23 and 0.21) at higher cost (£1185, €1770 and €1183 per patient) than SoC alone, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £6152/QALY, €7736/QALY and €5511/QALY, respectively. Reduced HHF incidence provided most cost offsets for empagliflozin plus SoC. Similar results were obtained for a range of subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated empagliflozin plus SoC remained cost-effective vs. SoC at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000/QALY, €20,000/QALY and €30,000/QALY in 79.6%, 75.5% and 97.3% of model runs for the UK, Spain and France, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC leads to health benefits for patients with HFrEF and is a cost-effective treatment option for payers in multiple European countries (UK, Spain, France). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10550866/ /pubmed/36463524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Tafazzoli, Ali Reifsnider, Odette S. Bellanca, Leana Ishak, Jack Carrasco, Marc Rakonczai, Pal Stargardter, Matthew Linden, Stephan A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title | A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_full | A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_fullStr | A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_full_unstemmed | A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_short | A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
title_sort | european multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tafazzoliali aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT reifsniderodettes aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT bellancaleana aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT ishakjack aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT carrascomarc aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT rakonczaipal aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT stargardtermatthew aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT lindenstephan aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT tafazzoliali europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT reifsniderodettes europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT bellancaleana europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT ishakjack europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT carrascomarc europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT rakonczaipal europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT stargardtermatthew europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction AT lindenstephan europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction |