Cargando…

A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tafazzoli, Ali, Reifsnider, Odette S., Bellanca, Leana, Ishak, Jack, Carrasco, Marc, Rakonczai, Pal, Stargardter, Matthew, Linden, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6
_version_ 1785115643012448256
author Tafazzoli, Ali
Reifsnider, Odette S.
Bellanca, Leana
Ishak, Jack
Carrasco, Marc
Rakonczai, Pal
Stargardter, Matthew
Linden, Stephan
author_facet Tafazzoli, Ali
Reifsnider, Odette S.
Bellanca, Leana
Ishak, Jack
Carrasco, Marc
Rakonczai, Pal
Stargardter, Matthew
Linden, Stephan
author_sort Tafazzoli, Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients’ progression through health states based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score. The model predicted risk of death, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure (HHF), treatment-related adverse events, and treatment discontinuation each monthly cycle. Clinical inputs and utilities were derived from EMPEROR-Reduced trial data, supplemented by published literature and national costing databases. Costs (2021 pound sterling/euro) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted annually for the UK (3.5%), Spain (3.0%) and France (2.5%). RESULTS: In the UK, Spain and France, empagliflozin plus SoC yielded additional QALYs (0.19, 0.23 and 0.21) at higher cost (£1185, €1770 and €1183 per patient) than SoC alone, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £6152/QALY, €7736/QALY and €5511/QALY, respectively. Reduced HHF incidence provided most cost offsets for empagliflozin plus SoC. Similar results were obtained for a range of subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated empagliflozin plus SoC remained cost-effective vs. SoC at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000/QALY, €20,000/QALY and €30,000/QALY in 79.6%, 75.5% and 97.3% of model runs for the UK, Spain and France, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC leads to health benefits for patients with HFrEF and is a cost-effective treatment option for payers in multiple European countries (UK, Spain, France). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10550866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105508662023-10-06 A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction Tafazzoli, Ali Reifsnider, Odette S. Bellanca, Leana Ishak, Jack Carrasco, Marc Rakonczai, Pal Stargardter, Matthew Linden, Stephan Eur J Health Econ Original Paper PURPOSE: This research examined the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the perspective of healthcare payers in the United Kingdom (UK), Spain and France. METHODS: A lifetime Markov cohort model was developed to simulate patients’ progression through health states based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score. The model predicted risk of death, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure (HHF), treatment-related adverse events, and treatment discontinuation each monthly cycle. Clinical inputs and utilities were derived from EMPEROR-Reduced trial data, supplemented by published literature and national costing databases. Costs (2021 pound sterling/euro) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted annually for the UK (3.5%), Spain (3.0%) and France (2.5%). RESULTS: In the UK, Spain and France, empagliflozin plus SoC yielded additional QALYs (0.19, 0.23 and 0.21) at higher cost (£1185, €1770 and €1183 per patient) than SoC alone, yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £6152/QALY, €7736/QALY and €5511/QALY, respectively. Reduced HHF incidence provided most cost offsets for empagliflozin plus SoC. Similar results were obtained for a range of subgroups and sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity results indicated empagliflozin plus SoC remained cost-effective vs. SoC at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000/QALY, €20,000/QALY and €30,000/QALY in 79.6%, 75.5% and 97.3% of model runs for the UK, Spain and France, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin added to SoC leads to health benefits for patients with HFrEF and is a cost-effective treatment option for payers in multiple European countries (UK, Spain, France). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10550866/ /pubmed/36463524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tafazzoli, Ali
Reifsnider, Odette S.
Bellanca, Leana
Ishak, Jack
Carrasco, Marc
Rakonczai, Pal
Stargardter, Matthew
Linden, Stephan
A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_short A European multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_sort european multinational cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36463524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01555-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tafazzoliali aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT reifsniderodettes aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT bellancaleana aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT ishakjack aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT carrascomarc aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT rakonczaipal aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT stargardtermatthew aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT lindenstephan aeuropeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT tafazzoliali europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT reifsniderodettes europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT bellancaleana europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT ishakjack europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT carrascomarc europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT rakonczaipal europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT stargardtermatthew europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT lindenstephan europeanmultinationalcosteffectivenessanalysisofempagliflozininheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction