Cargando…

Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

To access the effect of vision protection therapy on neovascular conversion in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patient unidentified data aggregated by Vestrum Health, LLC (VH) from over 320 US retina specialists was analyzed to compare the conversion rate from dry to neovascular (wet) AMD in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luttrull, Jeffrey K., Gray, Gerry, Bhavan, Sathy V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43605-w
_version_ 1785115649163395072
author Luttrull, Jeffrey K.
Gray, Gerry
Bhavan, Sathy V.
author_facet Luttrull, Jeffrey K.
Gray, Gerry
Bhavan, Sathy V.
author_sort Luttrull, Jeffrey K.
collection PubMed
description To access the effect of vision protection therapy on neovascular conversion in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patient unidentified data aggregated by Vestrum Health, LLC (VH) from over 320 US retina specialists was analyzed to compare the conversion rate from dry to neovascular (wet) AMD in a practice employing VPT (VPT group) compared to those employing standard care alone (SCA group) between January 2017 through July 2023. 500,00 eyes were filtered then matched for neovascular conversion risk factors by propensity scoring and compared in a 10/1 ratio of 7370 SCA and 737 VPT treated eyes. SCA eyes had significantly fewer clinical encounters and shorter follow up than the VPT group. Despite this, the risk of neovascular conversion by PS was significantly lower in the VPT group compared to SCA (HR 5.73, p < 0.0001). Analysis matching the encounter frequency of both groups as a post-randomization variable produced a similar HR (HR 5.98, p < 0.0001). Because 9% of eyes in the VPT group were not treated with VPT due to bilateral early (low-risk) AMD, analysis comparing the SCA group to VPT-treated eyes was done that also showed significantly lower conversion rates in the VPT-treated eyes, with or without encounter frequency matching (HR 5.84, 5.65, p < 0.0001). Visual acuity was consistently better in VPT eyes compared to SCA eyes throughout the study time window. The advantage of VPT over SCA increased with increased SCA encounter frequency and higher conversion risk factors, including age and ICD10 coded dry AMD severity. Neovascular (wet) AMD is the main cause of irreversible visual loss worldwide. Consistent with two prior studies, the current study finds Vision Protection Therapy markedly more effective at both recognizing and preventing neovascular AMD than the current standard of care, benefiting the highest risk dry AMD eyes the most.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10550910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105509102023-10-06 Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration Luttrull, Jeffrey K. Gray, Gerry Bhavan, Sathy V. Sci Rep Article To access the effect of vision protection therapy on neovascular conversion in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patient unidentified data aggregated by Vestrum Health, LLC (VH) from over 320 US retina specialists was analyzed to compare the conversion rate from dry to neovascular (wet) AMD in a practice employing VPT (VPT group) compared to those employing standard care alone (SCA group) between January 2017 through July 2023. 500,00 eyes were filtered then matched for neovascular conversion risk factors by propensity scoring and compared in a 10/1 ratio of 7370 SCA and 737 VPT treated eyes. SCA eyes had significantly fewer clinical encounters and shorter follow up than the VPT group. Despite this, the risk of neovascular conversion by PS was significantly lower in the VPT group compared to SCA (HR 5.73, p < 0.0001). Analysis matching the encounter frequency of both groups as a post-randomization variable produced a similar HR (HR 5.98, p < 0.0001). Because 9% of eyes in the VPT group were not treated with VPT due to bilateral early (low-risk) AMD, analysis comparing the SCA group to VPT-treated eyes was done that also showed significantly lower conversion rates in the VPT-treated eyes, with or without encounter frequency matching (HR 5.84, 5.65, p < 0.0001). Visual acuity was consistently better in VPT eyes compared to SCA eyes throughout the study time window. The advantage of VPT over SCA increased with increased SCA encounter frequency and higher conversion risk factors, including age and ICD10 coded dry AMD severity. Neovascular (wet) AMD is the main cause of irreversible visual loss worldwide. Consistent with two prior studies, the current study finds Vision Protection Therapy markedly more effective at both recognizing and preventing neovascular AMD than the current standard of care, benefiting the highest risk dry AMD eyes the most. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10550910/ /pubmed/37794027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43605-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Luttrull, Jeffrey K.
Gray, Gerry
Bhavan, Sathy V.
Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_full Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_fullStr Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_short Vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
title_sort vision protection therapy for prevention of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10550910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43605-w
work_keys_str_mv AT luttrulljeffreyk visionprotectiontherapyforpreventionofneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT graygerry visionprotectiontherapyforpreventionofneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration
AT bhavansathyv visionprotectiontherapyforpreventionofneovascularagerelatedmaculardegeneration