Cargando…

Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy

Reusing of alloy has become a need of time due to the increasing demand, depletion of resources, and substantial increase in their price. The alloys used require a long-term stay in the oral cavity exposed to a wet environment, so they must have good wear resistance, biocompatibility, and mechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Gotam, chaturvedi, Saurabh, Naqash, Talib Amin, Hussain, Muhammad Waqar, Saquib, Shahabe, Suleman, Ghazala, Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer, Shafi, Shabina, Sharif, Rania A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40377-1
_version_ 1785115673190465536
author Das, Gotam
chaturvedi, Saurabh
Naqash, Talib Amin
Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
Saquib, Shahabe
Suleman, Ghazala
Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer
Shafi, Shabina
Sharif, Rania A.
author_facet Das, Gotam
chaturvedi, Saurabh
Naqash, Talib Amin
Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
Saquib, Shahabe
Suleman, Ghazala
Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer
Shafi, Shabina
Sharif, Rania A.
author_sort Das, Gotam
collection PubMed
description Reusing of alloy has become a need of time due to the increasing demand, depletion of resources, and substantial increase in their price. The alloys used require a long-term stay in the oral cavity exposed to a wet environment, so they must have good wear resistance, biocompatibility, and mechanically good strength. In this study, the vertical marginal discrepancy, surface roughness, and microhardness of the new and recast nickel–chromium (base metal) alloys were evaluated. 125 wax patterns were fabricated from a customized stainless steel master die with a heavy chamfer cervical margin divided into 5 groups. Each group had 25 samples. Group A: 25 wax patterns were cast using 100% by weight of new alloy, Group B: the casting was done by using 75% new alloy and 25% alloy by weight, Group C: wax patterns were cast using 50% new alloy and 50% alloy, Group D: 25% new alloy and 75% alloy and Group E: 100% recast alloy. The vertical marginal discrepancy was measured by an analytical scanning microscope, microhardness was tested on a universal testing machine, and surface roughness was on a tester of surface roughness. Castings produced using new alloys were better than those obtained with reused alloys. Alloys can be reused till 50% by weight along with the new alloy and accelerated casting technique can be used to save the lab time to fabricate castings with acceptable vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness. This indicated that 50% recasting of (Ni–Cr) can be used as a good alternative for the new alloy from an economical point of view.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105510112023-10-06 Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy Das, Gotam chaturvedi, Saurabh Naqash, Talib Amin Hussain, Muhammad Waqar Saquib, Shahabe Suleman, Ghazala Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer Shafi, Shabina Sharif, Rania A. Sci Rep Article Reusing of alloy has become a need of time due to the increasing demand, depletion of resources, and substantial increase in their price. The alloys used require a long-term stay in the oral cavity exposed to a wet environment, so they must have good wear resistance, biocompatibility, and mechanically good strength. In this study, the vertical marginal discrepancy, surface roughness, and microhardness of the new and recast nickel–chromium (base metal) alloys were evaluated. 125 wax patterns were fabricated from a customized stainless steel master die with a heavy chamfer cervical margin divided into 5 groups. Each group had 25 samples. Group A: 25 wax patterns were cast using 100% by weight of new alloy, Group B: the casting was done by using 75% new alloy and 25% alloy by weight, Group C: wax patterns were cast using 50% new alloy and 50% alloy, Group D: 25% new alloy and 75% alloy and Group E: 100% recast alloy. The vertical marginal discrepancy was measured by an analytical scanning microscope, microhardness was tested on a universal testing machine, and surface roughness was on a tester of surface roughness. Castings produced using new alloys were better than those obtained with reused alloys. Alloys can be reused till 50% by weight along with the new alloy and accelerated casting technique can be used to save the lab time to fabricate castings with acceptable vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness. This indicated that 50% recasting of (Ni–Cr) can be used as a good alternative for the new alloy from an economical point of view. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10551011/ /pubmed/37794022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40377-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Das, Gotam
chaturvedi, Saurabh
Naqash, Talib Amin
Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
Saquib, Shahabe
Suleman, Ghazala
Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer
Shafi, Shabina
Sharif, Rania A.
Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title_full Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title_fullStr Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title_short Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
title_sort comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40377-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dasgotam comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT chaturvedisaurabh comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT naqashtalibamin comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT hussainmuhammadwaqar comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT saquibshahabe comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT sulemanghazala comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT sindiabdulelahsameer comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT shafishabina comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy
AT sharifraniaa comparativeinvitromicroscopicevaluationofverticalmarginaldiscrepancymicrohardnessandsurfaceroughnessofnickelchromiuminnewandrecastalloy