Cargando…
The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory
We investigated whether and how different types of search distractions affect visual search behavior and target memory while participants searched in a real-world environment. They searched either undistracted (control condition), listened to a podcast (auditory distraction), counted down aloud at i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43679-6 |
_version_ | 1785115674388987904 |
---|---|
author | Nachtnebel, Sarah Jasmin Cambronero-Delgadillo, Alejandro Javier Helmers, Linda Ischebeck, Anja Höfler, Margit |
author_facet | Nachtnebel, Sarah Jasmin Cambronero-Delgadillo, Alejandro Javier Helmers, Linda Ischebeck, Anja Höfler, Margit |
author_sort | Nachtnebel, Sarah Jasmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated whether and how different types of search distractions affect visual search behavior and target memory while participants searched in a real-world environment. They searched either undistracted (control condition), listened to a podcast (auditory distraction), counted down aloud at intervals of three while searching (executive working memory load), or were forced to stop the search on half of the trials (time pressure). In line with findings from laboratory settings, participants searched longer but made fewer errors when the target was absent than when it was present, regardless of distraction condition. Furthermore, compared to the auditory distraction condition, the executive working memory load led to higher error rates (but not longer search times). In a surprise memory test after the end of the search tasks, recognition was better for previously present targets than for absent targets. Again, this was regardless of the previous distraction condition, although significantly fewer targets were remembered by the participants in the executive working memory load condition than by those in the control condition. The findings suggest that executive working memory load, but likely not auditory distraction and time pressure affected visual search performance and target memory in a real-world environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10551016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105510162023-10-06 The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory Nachtnebel, Sarah Jasmin Cambronero-Delgadillo, Alejandro Javier Helmers, Linda Ischebeck, Anja Höfler, Margit Sci Rep Article We investigated whether and how different types of search distractions affect visual search behavior and target memory while participants searched in a real-world environment. They searched either undistracted (control condition), listened to a podcast (auditory distraction), counted down aloud at intervals of three while searching (executive working memory load), or were forced to stop the search on half of the trials (time pressure). In line with findings from laboratory settings, participants searched longer but made fewer errors when the target was absent than when it was present, regardless of distraction condition. Furthermore, compared to the auditory distraction condition, the executive working memory load led to higher error rates (but not longer search times). In a surprise memory test after the end of the search tasks, recognition was better for previously present targets than for absent targets. Again, this was regardless of the previous distraction condition, although significantly fewer targets were remembered by the participants in the executive working memory load condition than by those in the control condition. The findings suggest that executive working memory load, but likely not auditory distraction and time pressure affected visual search performance and target memory in a real-world environment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10551016/ /pubmed/37794077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43679-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nachtnebel, Sarah Jasmin Cambronero-Delgadillo, Alejandro Javier Helmers, Linda Ischebeck, Anja Höfler, Margit The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title | The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title_full | The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title_fullStr | The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title_short | The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
title_sort | impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43679-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nachtnebelsarahjasmin theimpactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT cambronerodelgadilloalejandrojavier theimpactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT helmerslinda theimpactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT ischebeckanja theimpactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT hoflermargit theimpactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT nachtnebelsarahjasmin impactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT cambronerodelgadilloalejandrojavier impactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT helmerslinda impactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT ischebeckanja impactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory AT hoflermargit impactofdifferentdistractionsonoutdoorvisualsearchandobjectmemory |