Cargando…

Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism

Conservation agriculture (CONS A) is a sustainable agriculture system based on crop rotation with no tillage. It has various environmental advantages compared to conventional agriculture (CONV A): decreased water evaporation, erosion, and CO(2) emissions. In this first study of its kind, we aim to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElHamdi, Sihem, Sassi, Limam, Rekik, Mourad, Dhehibi, Mokhtar, Cheikh M'hamed, Hatem, Gharbi, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37808117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1244355
_version_ 1785115702292643840
author ElHamdi, Sihem
Sassi, Limam
Rekik, Mourad
Dhehibi, Mokhtar
Cheikh M'hamed, Hatem
Gharbi, Mohamed
author_facet ElHamdi, Sihem
Sassi, Limam
Rekik, Mourad
Dhehibi, Mokhtar
Cheikh M'hamed, Hatem
Gharbi, Mohamed
author_sort ElHamdi, Sihem
collection PubMed
description Conservation agriculture (CONS A) is a sustainable agriculture system based on crop rotation with no tillage. It has various environmental advantages compared to conventional agriculture (CONV A): decreased water evaporation, erosion, and CO(2) emissions. In this first study of its kind, we aim to evaluate the impact of this type of agriculture on sheep gastrointestinal parasites. Two lamb groups aged between 5 and 10 months were randomly included to graze separately on CONS A and CONV A pastures. Each group was composed of two batches of three lambs, and these were followed up for two rearing months. Liveweight, hematological parameter variation, and digestive parasites were studied. At the end of the study period, lambs were slaughtered the carcass yield was determined, and a helminthological autopsy was performed on the digestive tracts of the animals to estimate different parasitological indicators. There was no difference between lambs reared on CONS A and those reared on CONV A for all parasite indicators (infestation intensity, abundance, and prevalence). The same trend was also obtained for hematological parameters, liveweight evolution, and carcass yield. These results prove that there is no impact of CONS A on the sheep's digestive parasitism. Further studies are needed to support these findings on larger animal samples and to investigate the impact of conservation agriculture on other parasite species. Similar studies could also be conducted on ruminant species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105511642023-10-06 Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism ElHamdi, Sihem Sassi, Limam Rekik, Mourad Dhehibi, Mokhtar Cheikh M'hamed, Hatem Gharbi, Mohamed Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Conservation agriculture (CONS A) is a sustainable agriculture system based on crop rotation with no tillage. It has various environmental advantages compared to conventional agriculture (CONV A): decreased water evaporation, erosion, and CO(2) emissions. In this first study of its kind, we aim to evaluate the impact of this type of agriculture on sheep gastrointestinal parasites. Two lamb groups aged between 5 and 10 months were randomly included to graze separately on CONS A and CONV A pastures. Each group was composed of two batches of three lambs, and these were followed up for two rearing months. Liveweight, hematological parameter variation, and digestive parasites were studied. At the end of the study period, lambs were slaughtered the carcass yield was determined, and a helminthological autopsy was performed on the digestive tracts of the animals to estimate different parasitological indicators. There was no difference between lambs reared on CONS A and those reared on CONV A for all parasite indicators (infestation intensity, abundance, and prevalence). The same trend was also obtained for hematological parameters, liveweight evolution, and carcass yield. These results prove that there is no impact of CONS A on the sheep's digestive parasitism. Further studies are needed to support these findings on larger animal samples and to investigate the impact of conservation agriculture on other parasite species. Similar studies could also be conducted on ruminant species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10551164/ /pubmed/37808117 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1244355 Text en Copyright © 2023 ElHamdi, Sassi, Rekik, Dhehibi, Cheikh M'hamed and Gharbi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
ElHamdi, Sihem
Sassi, Limam
Rekik, Mourad
Dhehibi, Mokhtar
Cheikh M'hamed, Hatem
Gharbi, Mohamed
Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title_full Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title_fullStr Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title_full_unstemmed Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title_short Conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
title_sort conservation agriculture has no significant impact on sheep digestive parasitism
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37808117
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1244355
work_keys_str_mv AT elhamdisihem conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism
AT sassilimam conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism
AT rekikmourad conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism
AT dhehibimokhtar conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism
AT cheikhmhamedhatem conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism
AT gharbimohamed conservationagriculturehasnosignificantimpactonsheepdigestiveparasitism