Cargando…
Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice
The mechanisms underlying the formation and retrieval of memories are still an active area of research and discussion. Manifold models have been proposed and refined over the years, with most assuming a dichotomy between memory processes involving non-conscious and conscious mechanisms. Despite our...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1230082 |
_version_ | 1785115703961976832 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Benjamin Kahnau, Pia Hohlbaum, Katharina Mieske, Paul Andresen, Niek P. Boon, Marcus N. Thöne-Reineke, Christa Lewejohann, Lars Diederich, Kai |
author_facet | Lang, Benjamin Kahnau, Pia Hohlbaum, Katharina Mieske, Paul Andresen, Niek P. Boon, Marcus N. Thöne-Reineke, Christa Lewejohann, Lars Diederich, Kai |
author_sort | Lang, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mechanisms underlying the formation and retrieval of memories are still an active area of research and discussion. Manifold models have been proposed and refined over the years, with most assuming a dichotomy between memory processes involving non-conscious and conscious mechanisms. Despite our incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms, tests of memory and learning count among the most performed behavioral experiments. Here, we will discuss available protocols for testing learning and memory using the example of the most prevalent animal species in research, the laboratory mouse. A wide range of protocols has been developed in mice to test, e.g., object recognition, spatial learning, procedural memory, sequential problem solving, operant- and fear conditioning, and social recognition. Those assays are carried out with individual subjects in apparatuses such as arenas and mazes, which allow for a high degree of standardization across laboratories and straightforward data interpretation but are not without caveats and limitations. In animal research, there is growing concern about the translatability of study results and animal welfare, leading to novel approaches beyond established protocols. Here, we present some of the more recent developments and more advanced concepts in learning and memory testing, such as multi-step sequential lockboxes, assays involving groups of animals, as well as home cage-based assays supported by automated tracking solutions; and weight their potential and limitations against those of established paradigms. Shifting the focus of learning tests from the classical experimental chamber to settings which are more natural for rodents comes with a new set of challenges for behavioral researchers, but also offers the opportunity to understand memory formation and retrieval in a more conclusive way than has been attainable with conventional test protocols. We predict and embrace an increase in studies relying on methods involving a higher degree of automatization, more naturalistic- and home cage-based experimental setting as well as more integrated learning tasks in the future. We are confident these trends are suited to alleviate the burden on animal subjects and improve study designs in memory research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10551171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105511712023-10-06 Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice Lang, Benjamin Kahnau, Pia Hohlbaum, Katharina Mieske, Paul Andresen, Niek P. Boon, Marcus N. Thöne-Reineke, Christa Lewejohann, Lars Diederich, Kai Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience The mechanisms underlying the formation and retrieval of memories are still an active area of research and discussion. Manifold models have been proposed and refined over the years, with most assuming a dichotomy between memory processes involving non-conscious and conscious mechanisms. Despite our incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms, tests of memory and learning count among the most performed behavioral experiments. Here, we will discuss available protocols for testing learning and memory using the example of the most prevalent animal species in research, the laboratory mouse. A wide range of protocols has been developed in mice to test, e.g., object recognition, spatial learning, procedural memory, sequential problem solving, operant- and fear conditioning, and social recognition. Those assays are carried out with individual subjects in apparatuses such as arenas and mazes, which allow for a high degree of standardization across laboratories and straightforward data interpretation but are not without caveats and limitations. In animal research, there is growing concern about the translatability of study results and animal welfare, leading to novel approaches beyond established protocols. Here, we present some of the more recent developments and more advanced concepts in learning and memory testing, such as multi-step sequential lockboxes, assays involving groups of animals, as well as home cage-based assays supported by automated tracking solutions; and weight their potential and limitations against those of established paradigms. Shifting the focus of learning tests from the classical experimental chamber to settings which are more natural for rodents comes with a new set of challenges for behavioral researchers, but also offers the opportunity to understand memory formation and retrieval in a more conclusive way than has been attainable with conventional test protocols. We predict and embrace an increase in studies relying on methods involving a higher degree of automatization, more naturalistic- and home cage-based experimental setting as well as more integrated learning tasks in the future. We are confident these trends are suited to alleviate the burden on animal subjects and improve study designs in memory research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10551171/ /pubmed/37809039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1230082 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lang, Kahnau, Hohlbaum, Mieske, Andresen, Boon, Thöne-Reineke, Lewejohann and Diederich. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Behavioral Neuroscience Lang, Benjamin Kahnau, Pia Hohlbaum, Katharina Mieske, Paul Andresen, Niek P. Boon, Marcus N. Thöne-Reineke, Christa Lewejohann, Lars Diederich, Kai Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title | Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title_full | Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title_fullStr | Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title_short | Challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
title_sort | challenges and advanced concepts for the assessment of learning and memory function in mice |
topic | Behavioral Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37809039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1230082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langbenjamin challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT kahnaupia challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT hohlbaumkatharina challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT mieskepaul challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT andresenniekp challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT boonmarcusn challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT thonereinekechrista challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT lewejohannlars challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice AT diederichkai challengesandadvancedconceptsfortheassessmentoflearningandmemoryfunctioninmice |