Cargando…

Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of far-infrared radiation (FIR) after rotator cuff repair has not been demonstrated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of postoperatively applied FIR with regard to early pain, range of motion (ROM), and tendon-to-bone healing after arthroscopic rotator c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Joo Hyun, Yoon, Ji Young, Jeong, Myeong Gon, Jeong, Hyeon Jang, Oh, Joo Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811506
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22386
_version_ 1785115822106083328
author Park, Joo Hyun
Yoon, Ji Young
Jeong, Myeong Gon
Jeong, Hyeon Jang
Oh, Joo Han
author_facet Park, Joo Hyun
Yoon, Ji Young
Jeong, Myeong Gon
Jeong, Hyeon Jang
Oh, Joo Han
author_sort Park, Joo Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of far-infrared radiation (FIR) after rotator cuff repair has not been demonstrated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of postoperatively applied FIR with regard to early pain, range of motion (ROM), and tendon-to-bone healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A total of 64 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with small- to medium-sized tears were enrolled in this prospective comparative study and randomly divided into an FIR group (n = 31) and a control group (n = 33). In the FIR group, FIR using a radiator device (Aladdin-H) was applied for 30 minutes per session twice daily from the first postoperative day. This application lasted for 10 weeks during the postoperative period. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale for pain (pVAS) at 5 weeks and ROM at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Functional scores were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Healing of the repaired rotator cuff was also evaluated using ultrasonography at 3 months and magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups, clinical and functional outcomes were improved up to 6 months compared with preoperative values. At 5 weeks and 3 months postoperatively, the average pVAS was significantly lower in the FIR group than in the control group (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.4; p = 0.002 at 5 weeks, 2.4 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.8; p = 0.041 at 3 months). However, there was no significant difference in ROM, functional score, or healing rate between two groups at each follow-up time point. CONCLUSIONS: The application of FIR after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair could be a safe and effective procedure to decrease postoperative pain, especially in the early postoperative period. This effective application of FIR can be considered to facilitate painless rehabilitation in the postoperative period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105516752023-10-06 Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study Park, Joo Hyun Yoon, Ji Young Jeong, Myeong Gon Jeong, Hyeon Jang Oh, Joo Han Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of far-infrared radiation (FIR) after rotator cuff repair has not been demonstrated yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of postoperatively applied FIR with regard to early pain, range of motion (ROM), and tendon-to-bone healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A total of 64 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with small- to medium-sized tears were enrolled in this prospective comparative study and randomly divided into an FIR group (n = 31) and a control group (n = 33). In the FIR group, FIR using a radiator device (Aladdin-H) was applied for 30 minutes per session twice daily from the first postoperative day. This application lasted for 10 weeks during the postoperative period. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale for pain (pVAS) at 5 weeks and ROM at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Functional scores were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Healing of the repaired rotator cuff was also evaluated using ultrasonography at 3 months and magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In both groups, clinical and functional outcomes were improved up to 6 months compared with preoperative values. At 5 weeks and 3 months postoperatively, the average pVAS was significantly lower in the FIR group than in the control group (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.4; p = 0.002 at 5 weeks, 2.4 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.8; p = 0.041 at 3 months). However, there was no significant difference in ROM, functional score, or healing rate between two groups at each follow-up time point. CONCLUSIONS: The application of FIR after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair could be a safe and effective procedure to decrease postoperative pain, especially in the early postoperative period. This effective application of FIR can be considered to facilitate painless rehabilitation in the postoperative period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2023-10 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10551675/ /pubmed/37811506 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22386 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Joo Hyun
Yoon, Ji Young
Jeong, Myeong Gon
Jeong, Hyeon Jang
Oh, Joo Han
Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_full Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_fullStr Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_short Far-Infrared Radiation to Improve Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Clinical Study
title_sort far-infrared radiation to improve clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized comparative clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811506
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22386
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjoohyun farinfraredradiationtoimproveclinicaloutcomesafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairaprospectiverandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT yoonjiyoung farinfraredradiationtoimproveclinicaloutcomesafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairaprospectiverandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT jeongmyeonggon farinfraredradiationtoimproveclinicaloutcomesafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairaprospectiverandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT jeonghyeonjang farinfraredradiationtoimproveclinicaloutcomesafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairaprospectiverandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy
AT ohjoohan farinfraredradiationtoimproveclinicaloutcomesafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairaprospectiverandomizedcomparativeclinicalstudy