Cargando…

Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Son, Hee Jung, Chang, Bong-Soon, Chang, Sam Yeol, Gimm, Geunwu, Kim, Hyoungmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811507
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22362
_version_ 1785115822841135104
author Son, Hee Jung
Chang, Bong-Soon
Chang, Sam Yeol
Gimm, Geunwu
Kim, Hyoungmin
author_facet Son, Hee Jung
Chang, Bong-Soon
Chang, Sam Yeol
Gimm, Geunwu
Kim, Hyoungmin
author_sort Son, Hee Jung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process-splitting decompression (SPSD) for DLSS. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent SPSD between September 2014 and March 2016. Of these, 42 (70 segments) who had at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index, and walking distance without resting were scored to assess clinical outcomes at the preoperative and final follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the union status of the split spinous processes (SPs). For radiological outcomes, slip in the neutral position as a static parameter, anterior flexion-neutral translation, and posterior extension-neutral translation as a dynamic parameter were measured before and at the final follow-up after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were also measured. Reoperation rate at the index levels was investigated, and predictive risk factors for reoperation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation as the endpoint to estimate the longevity of the SPSD for DLSS. RESULTS: All clinical outcomes improved significantly at the final follow-up compared to those at the initial visit (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes did not differ according to the union status of the split SP. There were no cases of definite segmental instability and no significant changes in the static or dynamic parameters after surgery. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis increased, and pelvic tilt decreased significantly at the follow-up (p < 0.05), despite no significant change in the sagittal vertical axis. The mean longevity of the procedure before the reoperation was 82.9 months. Five patients (11.9%) underwent reoperation at a mean of 52.2 months after the SPSD. There were no significant risk factors for reoperation; however, the preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis had an odds ratio of 7.556 (p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: SPSD for DLSS showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at the mid-term follow-up. SPSD could be a good surgical option for treating DLSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105516782023-10-06 Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Son, Hee Jung Chang, Bong-Soon Chang, Sam Yeol Gimm, Geunwu Kim, Hyoungmin Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: To overcome several disadvantages of conventional laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), several types of minimally invasive surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study was to report the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of spinous process-splitting decompression (SPSD) for DLSS. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent SPSD between September 2014 and March 2016. Of these, 42 (70 segments) who had at least 5 years of follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. The visual analog scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index, and walking distance without resting were scored to assess clinical outcomes at the preoperative and final follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the union status of the split spinous processes (SPs). For radiological outcomes, slip in the neutral position as a static parameter, anterior flexion-neutral translation, and posterior extension-neutral translation as a dynamic parameter were measured before and at the final follow-up after surgery. Spinopelvic parameters were also measured. Reoperation rate at the index levels was investigated, and predictive risk factors for reoperation were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Survival analysis was performed with reoperation as the endpoint to estimate the longevity of the SPSD for DLSS. RESULTS: All clinical outcomes improved significantly at the final follow-up compared to those at the initial visit (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes did not differ according to the union status of the split SP. There were no cases of definite segmental instability and no significant changes in the static or dynamic parameters after surgery. Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis increased, and pelvic tilt decreased significantly at the follow-up (p < 0.05), despite no significant change in the sagittal vertical axis. The mean longevity of the procedure before the reoperation was 82.9 months. Five patients (11.9%) underwent reoperation at a mean of 52.2 months after the SPSD. There were no significant risk factors for reoperation; however, the preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis had an odds ratio of 7.556 (p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: SPSD for DLSS showed favorable clinical and radiological outcomes at the mid-term follow-up. SPSD could be a good surgical option for treating DLSS. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2023-10 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10551678/ /pubmed/37811507 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22362 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Son, Hee Jung
Chang, Bong-Soon
Chang, Sam Yeol
Gimm, Geunwu
Kim, Hyoungmin
Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title_full Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title_short Midterm Outcomes of Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up
title_sort midterm outcomes of muscle-preserving posterior lumbar decompression via sagittal splitting of the spinous process: minimum 5-year follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37811507
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios22362
work_keys_str_mv AT sonheejung midtermoutcomesofmusclepreservingposteriorlumbardecompressionviasagittalsplittingofthespinousprocessminimum5yearfollowup
AT changbongsoon midtermoutcomesofmusclepreservingposteriorlumbardecompressionviasagittalsplittingofthespinousprocessminimum5yearfollowup
AT changsamyeol midtermoutcomesofmusclepreservingposteriorlumbardecompressionviasagittalsplittingofthespinousprocessminimum5yearfollowup
AT gimmgeunwu midtermoutcomesofmusclepreservingposteriorlumbardecompressionviasagittalsplittingofthespinousprocessminimum5yearfollowup
AT kimhyoungmin midtermoutcomesofmusclepreservingposteriorlumbardecompressionviasagittalsplittingofthespinousprocessminimum5yearfollowup