Cargando…

Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension

While previous studies have examined the dose-response characteristics of certain antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination, response surface analysis for combination therapies involving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and either amlodipine (AML) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has not been e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Minhee, Oh, Eunsook, Ahn, Byungjin, Yoon, MoonTae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810629
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15
_version_ 1785115838149296128
author Cho, Minhee
Oh, Eunsook
Ahn, Byungjin
Yoon, MoonTae
author_facet Cho, Minhee
Oh, Eunsook
Ahn, Byungjin
Yoon, MoonTae
author_sort Cho, Minhee
collection PubMed
description While previous studies have examined the dose-response characteristics of certain antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination, response surface analysis for combination therapies involving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and either amlodipine (AML) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has not been explored, particularly in the context of low-dose combinations. The objectives of present study were to generate useful dose-response information for the combination of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and to predict the blood pressure lowering effects of combination therapies compared to monotherapies. We reviewed the New Drug Application data of combination drugs of ARB/AML and ARB/HCT. Data on systolic blood pressure (SBP), from studies conducted using a factorial dose-response design over a period of 8–12 weeks, were used. The placebo-subtracted SBP change was used for analysis. Response surface analyses of the collected data were conducted using a polynomial regression model. For ARB/AML combination, the quadratic polynomial regression model containing two linear terms, two quadratic terms, and one interaction term was best fitted to the naïve pooled data. Meanwhile, for ARB/HCT combination, the best-fitted model was a quadratic model that included two linear terms and two quadratic terms. The 1/2-dose combination of these medications, compared to each monotherapy, resulted in predicted SBP reductions that were 8–30% greater. The ratio of the estimated antihypertensive effects of the combination to the expected additive effects of each component ranged from 82% to 100% of the expected effect. These results can provide a rationale for developing lower-dose combinations of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and assist in designing clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105517472023-10-06 Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension Cho, Minhee Oh, Eunsook Ahn, Byungjin Yoon, MoonTae Transl Clin Pharmacol Original Article While previous studies have examined the dose-response characteristics of certain antihypertensive drugs alone or in combination, response surface analysis for combination therapies involving angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and either amlodipine (AML) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) has not been explored, particularly in the context of low-dose combinations. The objectives of present study were to generate useful dose-response information for the combination of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and to predict the blood pressure lowering effects of combination therapies compared to monotherapies. We reviewed the New Drug Application data of combination drugs of ARB/AML and ARB/HCT. Data on systolic blood pressure (SBP), from studies conducted using a factorial dose-response design over a period of 8–12 weeks, were used. The placebo-subtracted SBP change was used for analysis. Response surface analyses of the collected data were conducted using a polynomial regression model. For ARB/AML combination, the quadratic polynomial regression model containing two linear terms, two quadratic terms, and one interaction term was best fitted to the naïve pooled data. Meanwhile, for ARB/HCT combination, the best-fitted model was a quadratic model that included two linear terms and two quadratic terms. The 1/2-dose combination of these medications, compared to each monotherapy, resulted in predicted SBP reductions that were 8–30% greater. The ratio of the estimated antihypertensive effects of the combination to the expected additive effects of each component ranged from 82% to 100% of the expected effect. These results can provide a rationale for developing lower-dose combinations of ARB/AML or ARB/HCT and assist in designing clinical trials. Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2023-09 2023-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10551747/ /pubmed/37810629 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15 Text en Copyright © 2023 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Minhee
Oh, Eunsook
Ahn, Byungjin
Yoon, MoonTae
Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title_full Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title_fullStr Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title_short Response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
title_sort response surface analyses of antihypertensive effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810629
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2023.31.e15
work_keys_str_mv AT chominhee responsesurfaceanalysesofantihypertensiveeffectsofangiotensinreceptorblockersandamlodipineorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationtherapyinpatientswithessentialhypertension
AT oheunsook responsesurfaceanalysesofantihypertensiveeffectsofangiotensinreceptorblockersandamlodipineorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationtherapyinpatientswithessentialhypertension
AT ahnbyungjin responsesurfaceanalysesofantihypertensiveeffectsofangiotensinreceptorblockersandamlodipineorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationtherapyinpatientswithessentialhypertension
AT yoonmoontae responsesurfaceanalysesofantihypertensiveeffectsofangiotensinreceptorblockersandamlodipineorhydrochlorothiazidecombinationtherapyinpatientswithessentialhypertension