Cargando…

Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications

[Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asimi Neisiani, Ali, Moosakazemi, Farhad, Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536
_version_ 1785115865504546816
author Asimi Neisiani, Ali
Moosakazemi, Farhad
Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh
author_facet Asimi Neisiani, Ali
Moosakazemi, Farhad
Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh
author_sort Asimi Neisiani, Ali
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitating agents (PAs) play an essential role in the JPP. However, surprisingly, no study compares the efficiency of various PAs on an industrial scale. As an innovative approach, this investigation compares the technical and economic aspects of using various sodium and ammonium compounds (hydroxides, carbonates, bicarbonates, sulfates, and bisulfates) as typical PAs for the JPP at the Bafgh Zinc Smelting Company (BZSC) plant. Experimental results revealed that ammonium hydroxide, with 90.85% iron removal efficiency, had the highest performance, and sodium bisulfate and ammonium bisulfate had the lowest efficiency (74.54 and 77.13%, respectively). However, since ammonium hydroxide is a corrosive PA, it is not a promising alternative to sodium sulfate (with both economic and safety issues). Based on technical and economic assessments, sodium carbonate (84.31% iron removal efficiency) showed the highest potential for an efficient JPP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105519082023-10-06 Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications Asimi Neisiani, Ali Moosakazemi, Farhad Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh ACS Omega [Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitating agents (PAs) play an essential role in the JPP. However, surprisingly, no study compares the efficiency of various PAs on an industrial scale. As an innovative approach, this investigation compares the technical and economic aspects of using various sodium and ammonium compounds (hydroxides, carbonates, bicarbonates, sulfates, and bisulfates) as typical PAs for the JPP at the Bafgh Zinc Smelting Company (BZSC) plant. Experimental results revealed that ammonium hydroxide, with 90.85% iron removal efficiency, had the highest performance, and sodium bisulfate and ammonium bisulfate had the lowest efficiency (74.54 and 77.13%, respectively). However, since ammonium hydroxide is a corrosive PA, it is not a promising alternative to sodium sulfate (with both economic and safety issues). Based on technical and economic assessments, sodium carbonate (84.31% iron removal efficiency) showed the highest potential for an efficient JPP. American Chemical Society 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10551908/ /pubmed/37810699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Asimi Neisiani, Ali
Moosakazemi, Farhad
Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh
Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title_full Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title_fullStr Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title_full_unstemmed Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title_short Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
title_sort technical and economic comparison between sodium and ammonium agents in the jarosite precipitation process—an evaluation for industrial applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536
work_keys_str_mv AT asimineisianiali technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications
AT moosakazemifarhad technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications
AT chelganisaeedchehreh technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications