Cargando…
Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications
[Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536 |
_version_ | 1785115865504546816 |
---|---|
author | Asimi Neisiani, Ali Moosakazemi, Farhad Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh |
author_facet | Asimi Neisiani, Ali Moosakazemi, Farhad Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh |
author_sort | Asimi Neisiani, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitating agents (PAs) play an essential role in the JPP. However, surprisingly, no study compares the efficiency of various PAs on an industrial scale. As an innovative approach, this investigation compares the technical and economic aspects of using various sodium and ammonium compounds (hydroxides, carbonates, bicarbonates, sulfates, and bisulfates) as typical PAs for the JPP at the Bafgh Zinc Smelting Company (BZSC) plant. Experimental results revealed that ammonium hydroxide, with 90.85% iron removal efficiency, had the highest performance, and sodium bisulfate and ammonium bisulfate had the lowest efficiency (74.54 and 77.13%, respectively). However, since ammonium hydroxide is a corrosive PA, it is not a promising alternative to sodium sulfate (with both economic and safety issues). Based on technical and economic assessments, sodium carbonate (84.31% iron removal efficiency) showed the highest potential for an efficient JPP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10551908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105519082023-10-06 Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications Asimi Neisiani, Ali Moosakazemi, Farhad Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh ACS Omega [Image: see text] Iron content can cause severe challenges through zinc production from zinc sulfide concentrate. The zinc industry extensively uses the jarosite precipitation process (JPP) to precipitate dissolved iron and remove it before transferring the solution to downstream stages. Precipitating agents (PAs) play an essential role in the JPP. However, surprisingly, no study compares the efficiency of various PAs on an industrial scale. As an innovative approach, this investigation compares the technical and economic aspects of using various sodium and ammonium compounds (hydroxides, carbonates, bicarbonates, sulfates, and bisulfates) as typical PAs for the JPP at the Bafgh Zinc Smelting Company (BZSC) plant. Experimental results revealed that ammonium hydroxide, with 90.85% iron removal efficiency, had the highest performance, and sodium bisulfate and ammonium bisulfate had the lowest efficiency (74.54 and 77.13%, respectively). However, since ammonium hydroxide is a corrosive PA, it is not a promising alternative to sodium sulfate (with both economic and safety issues). Based on technical and economic assessments, sodium carbonate (84.31% iron removal efficiency) showed the highest potential for an efficient JPP. American Chemical Society 2023-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10551908/ /pubmed/37810699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Asimi Neisiani, Ali Moosakazemi, Farhad Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation for Industrial Applications |
title | Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and
Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation
for Industrial Applications |
title_full | Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and
Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation
for Industrial Applications |
title_fullStr | Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and
Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation
for Industrial Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and
Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation
for Industrial Applications |
title_short | Technical and Economic Comparison between Sodium and
Ammonium Agents in the Jarosite Precipitation Process—An Evaluation
for Industrial Applications |
title_sort | technical and economic comparison between sodium and
ammonium agents in the jarosite precipitation process—an evaluation
for industrial applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37810699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asimineisianiali technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications AT moosakazemifarhad technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications AT chelganisaeedchehreh technicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweensodiumandammoniumagentsinthejarositeprecipitationprocessanevaluationforindustrialapplications |