Cargando…

Estimating the prevalence of discrepancies between study registrations and publications: a systematic review and meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES: Prospectively registering study plans in a permanent time-stamped and publicly accessible document is becoming more common across disciplines and aims to reduce risk of bias and make risk of bias transparent. Selective reporting persists, however, when researchers deviate from their regi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:	Research Methods
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076264

Ejemplares similares

Discrepancies between registration and publication of randomised controlled trials: an observational study
por: Walker, Kate F, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications
Publicado: (2022)

Selective reporting bias in randomised controlled trials from two network meta-analyses: comparison of clinical trial registrations and their respective publications
por: Wong, Eric KC, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Biases arising from linked administrative data for epidemiological research: a conceptual framework from registration to analyses
por: Shaw, Richard J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Lag times in the publication of network meta-analyses: a survey
por: Tonin, Fernanda S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
por: Page, Matthew J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Trial registration and time to publication in a retrospective cohort of publicly funded randomised controlled trials in New Zealand 1999–2017
por: Jull, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Analyses of ‘change scores’ do not estimate causal effects in observational data
por: Tennant, Peter W G, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
por: Moher, David, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Estimating Epidemic Incidence and Prevalence from Genomic Data
por: Vaughan, Timothy G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
por: Weston, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
por: Liberati, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov recruitment status and actual trial status: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

PsychOpen CAMA: Publication of community‐augmented meta‐analyses in psychology
por: Burgard, Tanja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
por: Korevaar, Daniël A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Discrepancies in endpoints between clinical trial protocols and clinical trial registration in randomized trials in oncology
por: Serpas, Victoria J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal
por: Dragioti, Elena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Discrepancies between UN models and DHS survey estimates of maternal orphan prevalence: insights from analyses of survey data from Zimbabwe
por: Robertson, L, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnès, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey
por: Wang, Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical trial registration, and publication in acupuncture studies: A systematic review
por: Matsuura, Yuto, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Getting our house in order: an audit of the registration and publication of clinical trials supported by the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit
por: Tompson, A C, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Discrepancies in the calibration of reaction rate analysers
por: Legg, E. F., et al.
Publicado: (1980)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Private-Public Opinion Discrepancy
por: Manfredi, Ren, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Recommendations for collecting and analysing migration-related determinants in public health research
por: Kajikhina, Katja, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A probabilistic method for testing and estimating selection differences between populations
por: He, Yungang, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
por: Chan, An-Wen, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
por: Thompson, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

A study to estimate tooth size discrepancy values specific to Saudi orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Alqahtani, Hamad
Publicado: (2023)

Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
por: Dwan, Kerry, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Systematic bias between blinded independent central review and local assessment: literature review and analyses of 76 phase III randomised controlled trials in 45 688 patients with advanced solid tumour
por: Zhang, Jianrong, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review
por: Aves, Theresa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials
por: Cro, Suzie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
por: Cohen, Jérémie F, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences
por: Soneson, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The relationship between study findings and publication outcome in anesthesia research following implementation of mandatory trial registration: A systematic review of publication bias
por: Chong, Simon W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants
por: Burgess, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Linking death registration and survey data: Procedures and cohort profile for The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)
por: Ward, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7s6ohp96n4253jemluaeiopv5g