Cargando…

Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study

INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azuara-Blanco, Augusto, Lawrenson, John G, King, Anthony J, Foster, Paul J, Virgili, Gianni, Guiney, Mary, Nolan, Winnie, Jindal, Anish, Sharma, Meenakshi, O'Neill, Ciaran, Cardwell, Christopher R, Clarke, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975
_version_ 1785115881084289024
author Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Lawrenson, John G
King, Anthony J
Foster, Paul J
Virgili, Gianni
Guiney, Mary
Nolan, Winnie
Jindal, Anish
Sharma, Meenakshi
O'Neill, Ciaran
Cardwell, Christopher R
Clarke, Mike
author_facet Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Lawrenson, John G
King, Anthony J
Foster, Paul J
Virgili, Gianni
Guiney, Mary
Nolan, Winnie
Jindal, Anish
Sharma, Meenakshi
O'Neill, Ciaran
Cardwell, Christopher R
Clarke, Mike
author_sort Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact tests, anterior segment OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) (AS-OCT) and limbal anterior chamber depth for patients referred to hospital with suspected angle closure compared with gonioscopy by ophthalmologist. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design: prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Inclusion criteria: adults referred from community optometry to hospital with suspected angle closure. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes: Positive/negative likelihood ratios, concordance, cost-effectiveness, proportion of patients requiring subsequent clinical assessment by ophthalmologist. Sample size: 600 individuals who have been referred with suspected angle closure from primary care (community optometry). We will have a 95% probability of detecting the true sensitivity of either test to within ±3.5% based on a sensitivity of 90%. The study would also have a 95% probability of detecting the true specificity of either test to within ±5%, assuming a specificity of 75%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical Review Board approval was obtained. REC reference: 22/LO/0885. Our findings will be disseminated to those involved in eye care services. We will have a knowledge exchange event at the end of the study, published via the Health Technology Assessment web page and in specialist journals. The results will be presented at professional conferences and directly to patients via patient group meetings and the Glaucoma UK charity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15115867.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10551982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105519822023-10-06 Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Lawrenson, John G King, Anthony J Foster, Paul J Virgili, Gianni Guiney, Mary Nolan, Winnie Jindal, Anish Sharma, Meenakshi O'Neill, Ciaran Cardwell, Christopher R Clarke, Mike BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact tests, anterior segment OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) (AS-OCT) and limbal anterior chamber depth for patients referred to hospital with suspected angle closure compared with gonioscopy by ophthalmologist. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design: prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Inclusion criteria: adults referred from community optometry to hospital with suspected angle closure. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes: Positive/negative likelihood ratios, concordance, cost-effectiveness, proportion of patients requiring subsequent clinical assessment by ophthalmologist. Sample size: 600 individuals who have been referred with suspected angle closure from primary care (community optometry). We will have a 95% probability of detecting the true sensitivity of either test to within ±3.5% based on a sensitivity of 90%. The study would also have a 95% probability of detecting the true specificity of either test to within ±5%, assuming a specificity of 75%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical Review Board approval was obtained. REC reference: 22/LO/0885. Our findings will be disseminated to those involved in eye care services. We will have a knowledge exchange event at the end of the study, published via the Health Technology Assessment web page and in specialist journals. The results will be presented at professional conferences and directly to patients via patient group meetings and the Glaucoma UK charity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15115867. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10551982/ /pubmed/37793921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostics
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Lawrenson, John G
King, Anthony J
Foster, Paul J
Virgili, Gianni
Guiney, Mary
Nolan, Winnie
Jindal, Anish
Sharma, Meenakshi
O'Neill, Ciaran
Cardwell, Christopher R
Clarke, Mike
Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_full Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_fullStr Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_full_unstemmed Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_short Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
title_sort technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ace): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
topic Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975
work_keys_str_mv AT azuarablancoaugusto technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT lawrensonjohng technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT kinganthonyj technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT fosterpaulj technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT virgiligianni technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT guineymary technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT nolanwinnie technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT jindalanish technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT sharmameenakshi technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT oneillciaran technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT cardwellchristopherr technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy
AT clarkemike technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy