Cargando…
Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study
INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975 |
_version_ | 1785115881084289024 |
---|---|
author | Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Lawrenson, John G King, Anthony J Foster, Paul J Virgili, Gianni Guiney, Mary Nolan, Winnie Jindal, Anish Sharma, Meenakshi O'Neill, Ciaran Cardwell, Christopher R Clarke, Mike |
author_facet | Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Lawrenson, John G King, Anthony J Foster, Paul J Virgili, Gianni Guiney, Mary Nolan, Winnie Jindal, Anish Sharma, Meenakshi O'Neill, Ciaran Cardwell, Christopher R Clarke, Mike |
author_sort | Azuara-Blanco, Augusto |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact tests, anterior segment OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) (AS-OCT) and limbal anterior chamber depth for patients referred to hospital with suspected angle closure compared with gonioscopy by ophthalmologist. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design: prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Inclusion criteria: adults referred from community optometry to hospital with suspected angle closure. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes: Positive/negative likelihood ratios, concordance, cost-effectiveness, proportion of patients requiring subsequent clinical assessment by ophthalmologist. Sample size: 600 individuals who have been referred with suspected angle closure from primary care (community optometry). We will have a 95% probability of detecting the true sensitivity of either test to within ±3.5% based on a sensitivity of 90%. The study would also have a 95% probability of detecting the true specificity of either test to within ±5%, assuming a specificity of 75%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical Review Board approval was obtained. REC reference: 22/LO/0885. Our findings will be disseminated to those involved in eye care services. We will have a knowledge exchange event at the end of the study, published via the Health Technology Assessment web page and in specialist journals. The results will be presented at professional conferences and directly to patients via patient group meetings and the Glaucoma UK charity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15115867. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10551982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105519822023-10-06 Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Lawrenson, John G King, Anthony J Foster, Paul J Virgili, Gianni Guiney, Mary Nolan, Winnie Jindal, Anish Sharma, Meenakshi O'Neill, Ciaran Cardwell, Christopher R Clarke, Mike BMJ Open Diagnostics INTRODUCTION: Angle-closure is responsible for half of all glaucoma blindness globally. Patients with suspected glaucoma require assessment of the drainage angle by an experienced clinician. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of two non-contact tests, anterior segment OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) (AS-OCT) and limbal anterior chamber depth for patients referred to hospital with suspected angle closure compared with gonioscopy by ophthalmologist. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design: prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Inclusion criteria: adults referred from community optometry to hospital with suspected angle closure. Primary outcome: Sensitivity and specificity. Secondary outcomes: Positive/negative likelihood ratios, concordance, cost-effectiveness, proportion of patients requiring subsequent clinical assessment by ophthalmologist. Sample size: 600 individuals who have been referred with suspected angle closure from primary care (community optometry). We will have a 95% probability of detecting the true sensitivity of either test to within ±3.5% based on a sensitivity of 90%. The study would also have a 95% probability of detecting the true specificity of either test to within ±5%, assuming a specificity of 75%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical Review Board approval was obtained. REC reference: 22/LO/0885. Our findings will be disseminated to those involved in eye care services. We will have a knowledge exchange event at the end of the study, published via the Health Technology Assessment web page and in specialist journals. The results will be presented at professional conferences and directly to patients via patient group meetings and the Glaucoma UK charity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15115867. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10551982/ /pubmed/37793921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostics Azuara-Blanco, Augusto Lawrenson, John G King, Anthony J Foster, Paul J Virgili, Gianni Guiney, Mary Nolan, Winnie Jindal, Anish Sharma, Meenakshi O'Neill, Ciaran Cardwell, Christopher R Clarke, Mike Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title | Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title_full | Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title_fullStr | Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title_full_unstemmed | Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title_short | Technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ACE): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
title_sort | technologies for the diagnosis of angle closure glaucoma (ace): protocol of a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional diagnostic study |
topic | Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37793921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azuarablancoaugusto technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT lawrensonjohng technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT kinganthonyj technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT fosterpaulj technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT virgiligianni technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT guineymary technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT nolanwinnie technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT jindalanish technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT sharmameenakshi technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT oneillciaran technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT cardwellchristopherr technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy AT clarkemike technologiesforthediagnosisofangleclosureglaucomaaceprotocolofaprospectivemulticentrecrosssectionaldiagnosticstudy |