Cargando…
Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6 |
_version_ | 1785115926017867776 |
---|---|
author | Ghofrani, Marjan Valizadeh, Leila Zamanzadeh, Vahid Ghahramanian, Akram Janati, Ali Taleghani, Fariba |
author_facet | Ghofrani, Marjan Valizadeh, Leila Zamanzadeh, Vahid Ghahramanian, Akram Janati, Ali Taleghani, Fariba |
author_sort | Ghofrani, Marjan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize and categorize key performance indicators (KPIs) for baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ performance measurement. METHODS: This study had two phases: (1) Interview: Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members and nurses. (2) Narrative Literature review: schools’ and universities’ reports and web pages were assessed to recognize KPIs. The data analysis method was directed content analysis. The Donabedian Model components were used to guide the data analysis. RESULTS: The total number of indicators retrieved was 468; 75 were from interviews with faculty members and nurses and 393 were from the literature review. Indicators were categorized into: Structure (staff; equipment, resources, and facilities; guidelines), Process (education; communication and collaboration; evaluation), and Outcome (survey and accreditation; national and international recognition; satisfaction; sustainability and financial efficiency; students; alumni; knowledge related to the field). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators were identified that were categorized into various groups related to the performance of nursing schools. Further investigations are needed with different groups of stakeholders including students, professional associations, healthcare institutions, alumni, and clients. As well in some areas, new or composite indicators may need to be developed. Also, each institution needs to select appropriate indicators based on its context, policy goals, and infrastructure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10552274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105522742023-10-06 Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews Ghofrani, Marjan Valizadeh, Leila Zamanzadeh, Vahid Ghahramanian, Akram Janati, Ali Taleghani, Fariba BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize and categorize key performance indicators (KPIs) for baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ performance measurement. METHODS: This study had two phases: (1) Interview: Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members and nurses. (2) Narrative Literature review: schools’ and universities’ reports and web pages were assessed to recognize KPIs. The data analysis method was directed content analysis. The Donabedian Model components were used to guide the data analysis. RESULTS: The total number of indicators retrieved was 468; 75 were from interviews with faculty members and nurses and 393 were from the literature review. Indicators were categorized into: Structure (staff; equipment, resources, and facilities; guidelines), Process (education; communication and collaboration; evaluation), and Outcome (survey and accreditation; national and international recognition; satisfaction; sustainability and financial efficiency; students; alumni; knowledge related to the field). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators were identified that were categorized into various groups related to the performance of nursing schools. Further investigations are needed with different groups of stakeholders including students, professional associations, healthcare institutions, alumni, and clients. As well in some areas, new or composite indicators may need to be developed. Also, each institution needs to select appropriate indicators based on its context, policy goals, and infrastructure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6. BioMed Central 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10552274/ /pubmed/37798710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ghofrani, Marjan Valizadeh, Leila Zamanzadeh, Vahid Ghahramanian, Akram Janati, Ali Taleghani, Fariba Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title | Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title_full | Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title_fullStr | Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title_short | Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
title_sort | baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghofranimarjan baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews AT valizadehleila baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews AT zamanzadehvahid baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews AT ghahramanianakram baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews AT janatiali baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews AT taleghanifariba baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews |