Cargando…

Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews

BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghofrani, Marjan, Valizadeh, Leila, Zamanzadeh, Vahid, Ghahramanian, Akram, Janati, Ali, Taleghani, Fariba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6
_version_ 1785115926017867776
author Ghofrani, Marjan
Valizadeh, Leila
Zamanzadeh, Vahid
Ghahramanian, Akram
Janati, Ali
Taleghani, Fariba
author_facet Ghofrani, Marjan
Valizadeh, Leila
Zamanzadeh, Vahid
Ghahramanian, Akram
Janati, Ali
Taleghani, Fariba
author_sort Ghofrani, Marjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize and categorize key performance indicators (KPIs) for baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ performance measurement. METHODS: This study had two phases: (1) Interview: Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members and nurses. (2) Narrative Literature review: schools’ and universities’ reports and web pages were assessed to recognize KPIs. The data analysis method was directed content analysis. The Donabedian Model components were used to guide the data analysis. RESULTS: The total number of indicators retrieved was 468; 75 were from interviews with faculty members and nurses and 393 were from the literature review. Indicators were categorized into: Structure (staff; equipment, resources, and facilities; guidelines), Process (education; communication and collaboration; evaluation), and Outcome (survey and accreditation; national and international recognition; satisfaction; sustainability and financial efficiency; students; alumni; knowledge related to the field). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators were identified that were categorized into various groups related to the performance of nursing schools. Further investigations are needed with different groups of stakeholders including students, professional associations, healthcare institutions, alumni, and clients. As well in some areas, new or composite indicators may need to be developed. Also, each institution needs to select appropriate indicators based on its context, policy goals, and infrastructure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10552274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105522742023-10-06 Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews Ghofrani, Marjan Valizadeh, Leila Zamanzadeh, Vahid Ghahramanian, Akram Janati, Ali Taleghani, Fariba BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in nurses’ and midwives’ education will increase workforce quantity and quality. Continual improvement of organization performance is based on continual measuring; Appropriate indicators must be selected to measure and appraise the performances. This study aimed to recognize and categorize key performance indicators (KPIs) for baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ performance measurement. METHODS: This study had two phases: (1) Interview: Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members and nurses. (2) Narrative Literature review: schools’ and universities’ reports and web pages were assessed to recognize KPIs. The data analysis method was directed content analysis. The Donabedian Model components were used to guide the data analysis. RESULTS: The total number of indicators retrieved was 468; 75 were from interviews with faculty members and nurses and 393 were from the literature review. Indicators were categorized into: Structure (staff; equipment, resources, and facilities; guidelines), Process (education; communication and collaboration; evaluation), and Outcome (survey and accreditation; national and international recognition; satisfaction; sustainability and financial efficiency; students; alumni; knowledge related to the field). CONCLUSIONS: A number of indicators were identified that were categorized into various groups related to the performance of nursing schools. Further investigations are needed with different groups of stakeholders including students, professional associations, healthcare institutions, alumni, and clients. As well in some areas, new or composite indicators may need to be developed. Also, each institution needs to select appropriate indicators based on its context, policy goals, and infrastructure. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6. BioMed Central 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10552274/ /pubmed/37798710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ghofrani, Marjan
Valizadeh, Leila
Zamanzadeh, Vahid
Ghahramanian, Akram
Janati, Ali
Taleghani, Fariba
Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title_full Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title_fullStr Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title_full_unstemmed Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title_short Baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
title_sort baccalaureate nursing education institutions’ key performance indicators: a review of the existing indicators and qualitative analysis of expert interviews
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01484-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ghofranimarjan baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews
AT valizadehleila baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews
AT zamanzadehvahid baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews
AT ghahramanianakram baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews
AT janatiali baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews
AT taleghanifariba baccalaureatenursingeducationinstitutionskeyperformanceindicatorsareviewoftheexistingindicatorsandqualitativeanalysisofexpertinterviews