Cargando…

Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is among the common musculoskeletal problem that hinders a person’s daily activities. Fascial tightness is a familiar cause of chronic neck pain that is often neglected and can further cause neck disability and a limited range of motion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batool, Syeda Aiman, Shakil-ul-Rehman, Syed, Tariq, Zainab, Ikram, Mehwish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06769-0
_version_ 1785115927234215936
author Batool, Syeda Aiman
Shakil-ul-Rehman, Syed
Tariq, Zainab
Ikram, Mehwish
author_facet Batool, Syeda Aiman
Shakil-ul-Rehman, Syed
Tariq, Zainab
Ikram, Mehwish
author_sort Batool, Syeda Aiman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neck pain is among the common musculoskeletal problem that hinders a person’s daily activities. Fascial tightness is a familiar cause of chronic neck pain that is often neglected and can further cause neck disability and a limited range of motion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare the effects of fascia therapy and fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February to August 2022 in the Riphah Rehabilitation Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Fifty-two participants of both genders, aged 18–40 years with chronic neck pain of at least 3–6 months were included. Group A (n = 26) received fascia therapy along with a conventional physical therapy protocol of hot pack, strengthening and stretching, while group B (n = 26) received the fascial manipulation treatment with conventional physical therapy. All the participants were assessed at baseline and after 3 weeks (3 sessions per week). Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Goniometer (range of motions) were the outcome measures. SPSS 25 was used for the data analysis and normality of the data through the Shaphiro-Wilk test (p > 0.05), and parametric tests were applied. RESULTS: The mean age of group A was 24.82 ± 2.64 years, and group B was 24.17 ± 2.20 years. The independent t-test result showed no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in all parameters except in cervical extension and right-side bending (p < 0.05). At the same time, the pair-wise comparison showed significant results (p < 0.05) for all outcome measures in both groups. CONCLUSION: DBM fascia therapy improved cervical extension and side bending (right) more than the fascial manipulation group.It is concluded that DBM fascia therapy shows more improvement as compared to other group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05272111 on 09/03/2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10552279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105522792023-10-06 Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain Batool, Syeda Aiman Shakil-ul-Rehman, Syed Tariq, Zainab Ikram, Mehwish BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Neck pain is among the common musculoskeletal problem that hinders a person’s daily activities. Fascial tightness is a familiar cause of chronic neck pain that is often neglected and can further cause neck disability and a limited range of motion. OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to compare the effects of fascia therapy and fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February to August 2022 in the Riphah Rehabilitation Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Fifty-two participants of both genders, aged 18–40 years with chronic neck pain of at least 3–6 months were included. Group A (n = 26) received fascia therapy along with a conventional physical therapy protocol of hot pack, strengthening and stretching, while group B (n = 26) received the fascial manipulation treatment with conventional physical therapy. All the participants were assessed at baseline and after 3 weeks (3 sessions per week). Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Goniometer (range of motions) were the outcome measures. SPSS 25 was used for the data analysis and normality of the data through the Shaphiro-Wilk test (p > 0.05), and parametric tests were applied. RESULTS: The mean age of group A was 24.82 ± 2.64 years, and group B was 24.17 ± 2.20 years. The independent t-test result showed no significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in all parameters except in cervical extension and right-side bending (p < 0.05). At the same time, the pair-wise comparison showed significant results (p < 0.05) for all outcome measures in both groups. CONCLUSION: DBM fascia therapy improved cervical extension and side bending (right) more than the fascial manipulation group.It is concluded that DBM fascia therapy shows more improvement as compared to other group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05272111 on 09/03/2022. BioMed Central 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10552279/ /pubmed/37798756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06769-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Batool, Syeda Aiman
Shakil-ul-Rehman, Syed
Tariq, Zainab
Ikram, Mehwish
Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title_full Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title_fullStr Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title_short Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
title_sort effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06769-0
work_keys_str_mv AT batoolsyedaaiman effectsoffasciatherapyversusfascialmanipulationonpainrangeofmotionandfunctioninpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT shakilulrehmansyed effectsoffasciatherapyversusfascialmanipulationonpainrangeofmotionandfunctioninpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT tariqzainab effectsoffasciatherapyversusfascialmanipulationonpainrangeofmotionandfunctioninpatientswithchronicneckpain
AT ikrammehwish effectsoffasciatherapyversusfascialmanipulationonpainrangeofmotionandfunctioninpatientswithchronicneckpain