Cargando…
Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly advancing field which utilizes brain activity to control external devices for a myriad of functions, including the restoration of motor function. Clinically, BCIs have been especially impactful in patients who suffer from stroke-mediated dam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799298 http://dx.doi.org/10.33696/neurol.4.077 |
_version_ | 1785115938357510144 |
---|---|
author | Penev, Yordan P. Beneke, Alice Root, Kevin T. Meisel, Emily Kwak, Sean Diaz, Michael J. Root, Julia L. Hosseini, Mohammad R. Lucke-Wold, Brandon |
author_facet | Penev, Yordan P. Beneke, Alice Root, Kevin T. Meisel, Emily Kwak, Sean Diaz, Michael J. Root, Julia L. Hosseini, Mohammad R. Lucke-Wold, Brandon |
author_sort | Penev, Yordan P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly advancing field which utilizes brain activity to control external devices for a myriad of functions, including the restoration of motor function. Clinically, BCIs have been especially impactful in patients who suffer from stroke-mediated damage. However, due to the rapid advancement in the field, there is a lack of accepted standards of practice. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature published regarding the efficacy of BCI-based rehabilitation of motor dysfunction in stroke patients. METHODOLOGY: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for relevant articles and screened for inclusion criteria by two authors. All discrepancies were resolved by discussion among both reviewers and subsequent consensus. RESULTS: 11/12 (91.6%) of studies focused on upper extremity outcomes and reported larger initial improvements for participants in the treatment arm (using BCI) as compared to those in the control arm (no BCI). 2/2 studies focused on lower extremity outcomes reported improvements for the treatment arm compared to the control arm. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This systematic review illustrates the utility BCI has for the restoration of upper extremity and lower extremity motor function in stroke patients and supports further investigation of BCI for other clinical indications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10552326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105523262023-10-05 Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review Penev, Yordan P. Beneke, Alice Root, Kevin T. Meisel, Emily Kwak, Sean Diaz, Michael J. Root, Julia L. Hosseini, Mohammad R. Lucke-Wold, Brandon J Exp Neurol Article BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are a rapidly advancing field which utilizes brain activity to control external devices for a myriad of functions, including the restoration of motor function. Clinically, BCIs have been especially impactful in patients who suffer from stroke-mediated damage. However, due to the rapid advancement in the field, there is a lack of accepted standards of practice. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature published regarding the efficacy of BCI-based rehabilitation of motor dysfunction in stroke patients. METHODOLOGY: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for relevant articles and screened for inclusion criteria by two authors. All discrepancies were resolved by discussion among both reviewers and subsequent consensus. RESULTS: 11/12 (91.6%) of studies focused on upper extremity outcomes and reported larger initial improvements for participants in the treatment arm (using BCI) as compared to those in the control arm (no BCI). 2/2 studies focused on lower extremity outcomes reported improvements for the treatment arm compared to the control arm. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This systematic review illustrates the utility BCI has for the restoration of upper extremity and lower extremity motor function in stroke patients and supports further investigation of BCI for other clinical indications. 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10552326/ /pubmed/37799298 http://dx.doi.org/10.33696/neurol.4.077 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Penev, Yordan P. Beneke, Alice Root, Kevin T. Meisel, Emily Kwak, Sean Diaz, Michael J. Root, Julia L. Hosseini, Mohammad R. Lucke-Wold, Brandon Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title | Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Therapeutic Effectiveness of Brain Computer Interfaces in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | therapeutic effectiveness of brain computer interfaces in stroke patients: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37799298 http://dx.doi.org/10.33696/neurol.4.077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penevyordanp therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT benekealice therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT rootkevint therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT meiselemily therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT kwaksean therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT diazmichaelj therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT rootjulial therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT hosseinimohammadr therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview AT luckewoldbrandon therapeuticeffectivenessofbraincomputerinterfacesinstrokepatientsasystematicreview |