Cargando…

Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elayah, Sadam Ahmed, Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem, Sakran, Karim Ahmed, Chao, Yang, Jingtao, Li, Hanyao, Huang, Li, Yang, Shi, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5
_version_ 1785115961661063168
author Elayah, Sadam Ahmed
Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem
Sakran, Karim Ahmed
Chao, Yang
Jingtao, Li
Hanyao, Huang
Li, Yang
Shi, Bing
author_facet Elayah, Sadam Ahmed
Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem
Sakran, Karim Ahmed
Chao, Yang
Jingtao, Li
Hanyao, Huang
Li, Yang
Shi, Bing
author_sort Elayah, Sadam Ahmed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10552431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105524312023-10-06 Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study Elayah, Sadam Ahmed Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem Sakran, Karim Ahmed Chao, Yang Jingtao, Li Hanyao, Huang Li, Yang Shi, Bing BMC Surg Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity. BioMed Central 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10552431/ /pubmed/37794436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elayah, Sadam Ahmed
Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem
Sakran, Karim Ahmed
Chao, Yang
Jingtao, Li
Hanyao, Huang
Li, Yang
Shi, Bing
Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title_full Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title_fullStr Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title_short Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
title_sort two cleft palate simulators of furlow double-opposing z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5
work_keys_str_mv AT elayahsadamahmed twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT alwatarymohammedqasem twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT sakrankarimahmed twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT chaoyang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT jingtaoli twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT hanyaohuang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT liyang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy
AT shibing twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy