Cargando…
Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted us...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5 |
_version_ | 1785115961661063168 |
---|---|
author | Elayah, Sadam Ahmed Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem Sakran, Karim Ahmed Chao, Yang Jingtao, Li Hanyao, Huang Li, Yang Shi, Bing |
author_facet | Elayah, Sadam Ahmed Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem Sakran, Karim Ahmed Chao, Yang Jingtao, Li Hanyao, Huang Li, Yang Shi, Bing |
author_sort | Elayah, Sadam Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10552431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105524312023-10-06 Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study Elayah, Sadam Ahmed Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem Sakran, Karim Ahmed Chao, Yang Jingtao, Li Hanyao, Huang Li, Yang Shi, Bing BMC Surg Research PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the porcine tongue for palatoplasty simulation compared to 3D-printed simulators and their surgical education role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 18 senior cleft surgeons participated in a palatoplasty simulation-based workshop conducted using porcine tongue simulators and 3D-printed simulators. This workshop consisted of a didactic session followed by a hands-on simulation session. Each participant independently used both simulators to perform Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty, which was assessed and scored by senior cleft surgeons using a scoring system including organizational flexibility and ductility, anatomical design simulation, proper incision, proper suturing, and convenience of operation. A paired t test was used for data statistical analysis and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as a statistically significant difference. RESULTS: All senior cleft surgeons strongly agreed that the simulation-based workshop was a valuable learning experience, and both simulators were useful and easy to manipulate (P = 1.00). The results of this comparative study showed that a porcine tongue palatoplasty simulator had an effectively significant difference in terms of organizational flexibility and ductility (P = 0.04), and suturing was better than the 3D-printed palatoplasty simulator (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the simulators regarding anatomical design simulation (P = 0.76) and incision simulation (P = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Both porcine tongue simulator and 3D-printed simulator have their unique strengths in surgical education for palatoplasty. Thus, the combined use of a porcine tongue and a 3D-printed cleft palate simulators are efficient as an educational model to practice Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty. The porcine tongue simulators are superior in terms of organizational flexibility, ductility, and suturing simulators, while with the 3D-printed simulator, various palatoplasty techniques can be repeatedly practiced with better-simulated face and oral cavity. BioMed Central 2023-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10552431/ /pubmed/37794436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Elayah, Sadam Ahmed Al-Watary, Mohammed Qasem Sakran, Karim Ahmed Chao, Yang Jingtao, Li Hanyao, Huang Li, Yang Shi, Bing Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title | Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title_full | Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title_short | Two cleft palate simulators of Furlow double-opposing Z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
title_sort | two cleft palate simulators of furlow double-opposing z- palatoplasty: a comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37794436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02201-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elayahsadamahmed twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT alwatarymohammedqasem twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT sakrankarimahmed twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT chaoyang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT jingtaoli twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT hanyaohuang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT liyang twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy AT shibing twocleftpalatesimulatorsoffurlowdoubleopposingzpalatoplastyacomparativestudy |