Cargando…

Distribution and Mobility of Amines Confined in Porous Silica Supports Assessed via Neutron Scattering, NMR, and MD Simulations: Impacts on CO(2) Sorption Kinetics and Capacities

[Image: see text] Solid-supported amines are a promising class of CO(2) sorbents capable of selectively capturing CO(2) from diverse sources. The chemical interactions between the amine groups and CO(2) give rise to the formation of strong CO(2) adducts, such as alkylammonium carbamates, carbamic ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Hyun June, Carrillo, Jan Michael Y., Jones, Christopher W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37722889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00363
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] Solid-supported amines are a promising class of CO(2) sorbents capable of selectively capturing CO(2) from diverse sources. The chemical interactions between the amine groups and CO(2) give rise to the formation of strong CO(2) adducts, such as alkylammonium carbamates, carbamic acids, and bicarbonates, which enable CO(2) capture even at low driving force, such as with ultradilute CO(2) streams. Among various solid-supported amine sorbents, oligomeric amines infused into oxide solid supports (noncovalently supported) are widely studied due to their ease of synthesis and low cost. This method allows for the construction of amine-rich sorbents while minimizing problems, such as leaching or evaporation, that occur with supported molecular amines. Researchers have pursued improved sorbents by tuning the physical and chemical properties of solid supports and amine phases. In terms of CO(2) uptake, the amine efficiency, or the moles of sorbed CO(2) per mole of amine sites, and uptake rate (CO(2) capture per unit time) are the most critical factors determining the effectiveness of the material. While structure–property relationships have been developed for different porous oxide supports, the interaction(s) of the amine phase with the solid support, the structure and distribution of the organic phase within the pores, and the mobility of the amine phase within the pores are not well understood. These factors are important, because the kinetics of CO(2) sorption, particularly when using the prototypical amine oligomer branched poly(ethylenimine) (PEI), follow an unconventional trend, with rapid initial uptake followed by a very slow, asymptotic approach to equilibrium. This suggests that the uptake of CO(2) within such solid-supported amines is mass transfer-limited. Therefore, improving sorption performance can be facilitated by better understanding the amine structure and distribution within the pores. In this context, model solid-supported amine sorbents were constructed from a highly ordered, mesoporous silica SBA-15 support, and an array of techniques was used to probe the soft matter domains within these hybrid materials. The choice of SBA-15 as the model support was based on its ordered arrangement of mesopores with tunable physical and chemical properties, including pore size, particle lengths, and surface chemistries. Branched PEI—the most common amine phase used in solid CO(2) sorbents—and its linear, low molecular weight analogue, tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), were deployed as the amine phases. Neutron scattering (NS), including small angle neutron scattering (SANS) and quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS), alongside solid-state NMR (ssNMR) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, was used to elucidate the structure and mobility of the amine phases within the pores of the support. Together, these tools, which have previously not been applied to such materials, provided new information regarding how the amine phases filled the support pores as the loading increased and the mobility of those amine phases. Varying pore surface-amine interactions led to unique trends for amine distributions and mobility; for instance, hydrophilic walls (i.e., attractive to amines) resulted in hampered motions with more intimate coordination to the walls, while amines around hydrophobic walls or walls with grafted chains that interrupt amine-wall coordination showed recovered mobility, with amines being more liberated from the walls. By correlating the structural and dynamic properties with CO(2) sorption properties, novel relationships were identified, shedding light on the performance of the amine sorbents, and providing valuable guidance for the design of more effective supported amine sorbents.