Cargando…

Model-based Deep Learning Reconstruction Using a Folded Image Training Strategy for Abdominal 3D T1-weighted Imaging

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of folded image training strategy (FITS) and the quality of images reconstructed using the improved model-based deep learning (iMoDL) network trained with FITS (FITS-iMoDL) for abdominal MR imaging. Methods: This retrospective study included abdominal 3D T1-weigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funayama, Satoshi, Motosugi, Utaroh, Ichikawa, Shintaro, Morisaka, Hiroyuki, Omiya, Yoshie, Onishi, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351603
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0103
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of folded image training strategy (FITS) and the quality of images reconstructed using the improved model-based deep learning (iMoDL) network trained with FITS (FITS-iMoDL) for abdominal MR imaging. Methods: This retrospective study included abdominal 3D T1-weighted images of 122 patients. In the experimental analyses, peak SNR (PSNR) and structure similarity index (SSIM) of images reconstructed with FITS-iMoDL were compared with those with the following reconstruction methods: conventional model-based deep learning (conv-MoDL), MoDL trained with FITS (FITS-MoDL), total variation regularized compressed sensing (CS), and parallel imaging (CG-SENSE). In the clinical analysis, SNR and image contrast were measured on the reference, FITS-iMoDL, and CS images. Three radiologists evaluated the image quality using a 5-point scale to determine the mean opinion score (MOS). Results: The PSNR of FITS-iMoDL was significantly higher than that of FITS-MoDL, conv-MoDL, CS, and CG-SENSE (P < 0.001). The SSIM of FITS-iMoDL was significantly higher than those of the others (P < 0.001), except for FITS-MoDL (P = 0.056). In the clinical analysis, the SNR of FITS-iMoDL was significantly higher than that of the reference and CS (P < 0.0001). Image contrast was equivalent within an equivalence margin of 10% among these three image sets (P < 0.0001). MOS was significantly improved in FITS-iMoDL (P < 0.001) compared with CS images in terms of liver edge and vessels conspicuity, lesion depiction, artifacts, blurring, and overall image quality. Conclusion: The proposed method, FITS-iMoDL, allowed a deeper MoDL reconstruction network without increasing memory consumption and improved image quality on abdominal 3D T1-weighted imaging compared with CS images.